PURPOSE: Blood cholesterol is a good estimator of risk for coronary heart disease. Six criteria for a screening cholesterol measurement are: (1) high predictive value of elevated cholesterol compared with a "gold standard" cholesterol measurement; (2) high correlation with the national reference system for cholesterol; (3) acceptable results obtainable by volunteer observers; (4) results available quickly; (5) reproducible results; and (6) low cost. We hypothesized that cholesterol measurements performed on the Reflotron by volunteer nurses would meet these criteria. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We recruited 345 subjects (160 men, 185 women, aged 20 to 84) and measured their blood cholesterol level by a method calibrated under the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Lipid Standardization Program (Lab-chol) and on the Reflotron (R-chol method). RESULTS: Comparison of the results showed good agreement (slope = 0.937; intercept = 0.27 mmol/liter). Comparison of the risk assignments made by the R-chol method against those made by the Lab-chol method, using the 1987 Adult Treatment Panel classification criteria, showed that the R-chol method has a sensitivity of 0.79 and a specificity of 0.98. Assuming a national prevalence of hypercholesterolemia of 25 percent, the positive predictive value is 0.92 and the negative predictive value is 0.93. The cost per screen was $1.25. CONCLUSION: These data show that volunteer observers can obtain screening cholesterol results on the Reflotron that are accurate, reliable, quickly available at a low cost, and have high predictive value for hypercholesterolemia.
PURPOSE: Blood cholesterol is a good estimator of risk for coronary heart disease. Six criteria for a screening cholesterol measurement are: (1) high predictive value of elevated cholesterol compared with a "gold standard" cholesterol measurement; (2) high correlation with the national reference system for cholesterol; (3) acceptable results obtainable by volunteer observers; (4) results available quickly; (5) reproducible results; and (6) low cost. We hypothesized that cholesterol measurements performed on the Reflotron by volunteer nurses would meet these criteria. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We recruited 345 subjects (160 men, 185 women, aged 20 to 84) and measured their blood cholesterol level by a method calibrated under the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Lipid Standardization Program (Lab-chol) and on the Reflotron (R-chol method). RESULTS: Comparison of the results showed good agreement (slope = 0.937; intercept = 0.27 mmol/liter). Comparison of the risk assignments made by the R-chol method against those made by the Lab-chol method, using the 1987 Adult Treatment Panel classification criteria, showed that the R-chol method has a sensitivity of 0.79 and a specificity of 0.98. Assuming a national prevalence of hypercholesterolemia of 25 percent, the positive predictive value is 0.92 and the negative predictive value is 0.93. The cost per screen was $1.25. CONCLUSION: These data show that volunteer observers can obtain screening cholesterol results on the Reflotron that are accurate, reliable, quickly available at a low cost, and have high predictive value for hypercholesterolemia.