Literature DB >> 3414728

Intravenous nicardipine for the treatment of severe hypertension.

J D Wallin1, M E Cook, L Blanski, G S Bienvenu, G G Clifton, H Langford, P Turlapaty, A Laddu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Severe hypertension responds to treatment with nifedipine given orally or sublingually. Nicardipine hydrochloride, a water soluble dihydropyridine analogue similar to nifedipine, has less of a negative ionotropic effect and produces less reflex tachycardia than nifedipine. Our purpose was to assess the antihypertensive efficacy and safety of intravenous nicardipine in a group of patients with severe hypertension (defined as a supine diastolic blood pressure of more than 120 mm Hg). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients with severe hypertension received treatment with intravenous nicardipine. Nicardipine titration was performed using doses of 4 to 15 mg/hour to achieve therapeutic goal (diastolic blood pressure 95 mm Hg or less or decrease in diastolic blood pressure of more than 25 mm Hg). After this therapeutic end-point was reached, patients received maintainance therapy with nicardipine for varying lengths of time: one hour (Group I), six hours (Group II), or 24 hours. When blood pressure control was lost, patients in Groups I and II entered a second maintenance period lasting a maximum of 24 hours. Onset and offset of action of nicardipine at various infusion rates and times of infusion were measured.
RESULTS: Onset time to achieve therapeutic response was rapid at 15 mg/hour (0.31 +/- 0.13 hours) when compared with lower doses (1.11 +/- 0.36 hours at 4 mg/hour; 0.54 +/- 0.09 hours at 5 mg/hour; 0.52 +/- 0.09 hours at 7 to 7.5 mg/hour). Those who showed a therapeutic response received maintenance infusions with nicardipine for one (n = 7), six (n = 6), or 24 (n = 5) hours. Sustained blood pressure control at a constant rate of nicardipine infusion was seen in all patients during the maintenance period. After discontinuation of nicardipine, the time for offset of action (increase in diastolic blood pressure of 10 mm Hg or more) was independent of duration of infusion. Decreases in both systolic and diastolic pressures correlated well with plasma nicardipine levels. Heart rate increased by about 10 beats/minute, but this increase did not correlate with plasma nicardipine levels. Side effects were minimal, consisting of headache and flushing. In seven patients, local phlebitis developed at the site of infusion. This occurred after at least 14 hours of infusion at a single site, and the incidence can probably be reduced by shortening the infusion time at a single site.
CONCLUSION: Nicardipine appears to be a safe and effective drug for intravenous use in the treatment of severe hypertension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3414728     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(88)90582-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  7 in total

1.  Parotitis due to nicardipine.

Authors:  X Bosch; J Sobrino; A Lopez-Soto; A Urbano-Marquez
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-04-04

Review 2.  Current and newer agents for hypertensive emergencies.

Authors:  Alan Padilla Ramos; Joseph Varon
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.369

3.  Intravenous nicardipine in hypertensive children.

Authors:  J M Treluyer; P Hubert; P Jouvet; S Couderc; M Cloup
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 3.183

4.  Formulation of controlled release microspheres containing nicardipine: the role of pharmacokinetic modeling and computer simulation.

Authors:  A Mrhar; M Bogataj; I Grabnar; R Karba
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  1999 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.569

5.  Gasserian ganglion radiofrequency thermoablation in a patient with aneurysm of the anterior communicating artery -A case report.

Authors:  Yong Ho Lee; Ji Hee Hong; Hye Kyung Shin
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med (Seoul)       Date:  2021-09-13

6.  Intravenous nicardipine and labetalol use in hypertensive patients with signs or symptoms suggestive of end-organ damage in the emergency department: a subgroup analysis of the CLUE trial.

Authors:  Chad M Cannon; Phillip Levy; Brigitte M Baumann; Pierre Borczuk; Abhinav Chandra; David M Cline; Deborah B Diercks; Brian Hiestand; Amy Hsu; Preeti Jois; Brian Kaminski; Richard M Nowak; Jon W Schrock; Joseph Varon; W Frank Peacock
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 7.  Management of hypertensive crises in the elderly.

Authors:  Abbas Alshami; Carlos Romero; America Avila; Joseph Varon
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.327

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.