Ali Sheikhzadeh1,2, Maria M Wertli3,4, Shira Schecter Weiner5,6,7, Eva Rasmussen-Barr8, Sherri Weiser5,6. 1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Occupational and Industrial Orthopedic Center (OIOC), NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, 63 Downing Street, New York, NY, 10014, USA. ali.sheikhzadeh@nyu.edu. 2. Graduate Program in Ergonomics and Biomechanics (ERBI), Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, New York University, New York, USA. ali.sheikhzadeh@nyu.edu. 3. Department of General Internal Medicine, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. 4. Horten Centre for Patient Oriented Research and Knowledge Transfer, University Hospital Zurich, Pestalozzistrasse, Zurich, Switzerland. 5. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Occupational and Industrial Orthopedic Center (OIOC), NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, 63 Downing Street, New York, NY, 10014, USA. 6. Graduate Program in Ergonomics and Biomechanics (ERBI), Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, New York University, New York, USA. 7. School of Health Sciences, Touro College, New York, NY, USA. 8. Department of Neurobiology, Karolinska Institutet, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Physiotherapy, Huddinge, Sweden.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Psychological factors may impact recovery in patients undergoing treatment for shoulder complaints. The aim of this review is to systematically analyse the evidence for the effect of modifiable psychological factors (MPF) on outcome, for patients with musculoskeletal shoulder disorders undergoing conservative or surgical treatment. MPF refers to factors that may change with intervention. METHODS: This is a systematic literature review. Five databases searched (MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase and PsycInfo), for longitudinal studies investigating the influence of MPF on prognosis of patients with shoulder disorders, all diagnoses, undergoing clinical interventions (conservative or surgical). Level of evidence was determined using Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) methodology. Moderate and high quality evidence was included. We extracted all MPF, categorized constructs into the following domains: beliefs (self-efficacy, expectation of recovery), coping (catastrophizing, avoidant coping), and affect (depression, anxiety). We evaluated constructs for its predictive value of at least one outcome. Outcomes were informed by this review. Evidence was classified into three categories: evidence for, inconclusive evidence, and evidence against. RESULTS: Of 1170 references, 40 distinct publications based on 35 datasets were included (intervention type: 20 surgical; 20 conservative). Overall, 22 studies (20 cohort studies and 2 RCTs) were classified as high quality and 18 studies (16 cohort studies, 2 RCTs) were classified as moderate quality. Outcomes reported included pain, disability/function, perceived recovery, physical and mental health, and work status. Based on the review, of the psychological constructs explored, these data would suggest that expectation of recovery, catastrophizing, avoidant coping, depression, and anxiety may predict outcome for patients managed surgically. In patients undergoing conservative intervention the evidence was either against (catastrophizing, depression, anxiety) or inconclusive (self-efficacy, expectation of recovery, avoidant coping) for the predictive value of psychological factors on outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Five constructs were predictive of outcome for surgically managed patients. This suggests that implementing the biopsychosocial approach (i.e., preoperative screening, intervention by a trained clinician) may be advantageous for patients recommended for shoulder surgery,,. The same is not indicated for conservatively managed patients as no conclusive association of MPF with outcomes was noted. The importance of other MPF on outcome requires further investigation.
BACKGROUND: Psychological factors may impact recovery in patients undergoing treatment for shoulder complaints. The aim of this review is to systematically analyse the evidence for the effect of modifiable psychological factors (MPF) on outcome, for patients with musculoskeletal shoulder disorders undergoing conservative or surgical treatment. MPF refers to factors that may change with intervention. METHODS: This is a systematic literature review. Five databases searched (MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase and PsycInfo), for longitudinal studies investigating the influence of MPF on prognosis of patients with shoulder disorders, all diagnoses, undergoing clinical interventions (conservative or surgical). Level of evidence was determined using Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) methodology. Moderate and high quality evidence was included. We extracted all MPF, categorized constructs into the following domains: beliefs (self-efficacy, expectation of recovery), coping (catastrophizing, avoidant coping), and affect (depression, anxiety). We evaluated constructs for its predictive value of at least one outcome. Outcomes were informed by this review. Evidence was classified into three categories: evidence for, inconclusive evidence, and evidence against. RESULTS: Of 1170 references, 40 distinct publications based on 35 datasets were included (intervention type: 20 surgical; 20 conservative). Overall, 22 studies (20 cohort studies and 2 RCTs) were classified as high quality and 18 studies (16 cohort studies, 2 RCTs) were classified as moderate quality. Outcomes reported included pain, disability/function, perceived recovery, physical and mental health, and work status. Based on the review, of the psychological constructs explored, these data would suggest that expectation of recovery, catastrophizing, avoidant coping, depression, and anxiety may predict outcome for patients managed surgically. In patients undergoing conservative intervention the evidence was either against (catastrophizing, depression, anxiety) or inconclusive (self-efficacy, expectation of recovery, avoidant coping) for the predictive value of psychological factors on outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Five constructs were predictive of outcome for surgically managed patients. This suggests that implementing the biopsychosocial approach (i.e., preoperative screening, intervention by a trained clinician) may be advantageous for patients recommended for shoulder surgery,,. The same is not indicated for conservatively managed patients as no conclusive association of MPF with outcomes was noted. The importance of other MPF on outcome requires further investigation.
Authors: K Greving; O Dorrestijn; J C Winters; F Groenhof; K van der Meer; M Stevens; R L Diercks Journal: Scand J Rheumatol Date: 2011-09-21 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: J J Luime; B W Koes; I J M Hendriksen; A Burdorf; A P Verhagen; H S Miedema; J A N Verhaar Journal: Scand J Rheumatol Date: 2004 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Patrick Doiron-Cadrin; Simon Lafrance; Marie Saulnier; Émie Cournoyer; Jean-Sébastien Roy; Joseph-Omer Dyer; Pierre Frémont; Clermont Dionne; Joy C MacDermid; Michel Tousignant; Annie Rochette; Véronique Lowry; Nathalie J Bureau; Martin Lamontagne; Marie-France Coutu; Patrick Lavigne; François Desmeules Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2020-01-31 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Anouck N Bletterman; Marcella E de Geest-Vrolijk; Johanna E Vriezekolk; Maria W Nijhuis-van der Sanden; Nico Lu van Meeteren; Thomas J Hoogeboom Journal: Clin Rehabil Date: 2017-09-19 Impact factor: 3.477
Authors: Javier Martinez-Calderon; Mira Meeus; Filip Struyf; Jose Miguel Morales-Asencio; Gabriel Gijon-Nogueron; Alejandro Luque-Suarez Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-04-13 Impact factor: 2.692