Literature DB >> 34145336

Comparison of gemcitabine-based chemotherapies for advanced biliary tract cancers by renal function: an exploratory analysis of JCOG1113.

Makoto Ueno1, Chigusa Morizane2, Takuji Okusaka2, Junki Mizusawa3, Tomoko Kataoka3, Masafumi Ikeda4, Masato Ozaka5, Naohiro Okano6, Kazuya Sugimori7, Akiko Todaka8, Satoshi Shimizu9, Nobumasa Mizuno10, Tomohisa Yamamoto11, Keiji Sano12, Kazutoshi Tobimatsu13, Akio Katanuma14, Atsushi Miyamoto15, Hironori Yamaguchi16, Tomohiro Nishina17, Hirofumi Shirakawa18, Yasushi Kojima19, Takamasa Oono20, Yasuyuki Kawamoto21, Masayuki Furukawa22, Tomohisa Iwai23, Kentaro Sudo24, Hiroyuki Miyakawa25, Tatsuya Yamashita26, Ichirou Yasuda27, Hidenori Takahashi28, Naoya Kato29, Kazuhiko Shioji30, Kyoko Shimizu31, Toshio Nakagohri32, Ken Kamata33, Hiroshi Ishii24, Junji Furuse6.   

Abstract

JCOG1113 is a randomized phase III trial in patients with advanced biliary tract cancers (BTCs) (UMIN000001685), and gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) was not inferior to gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC). However, poor renal function often results in high toxicity of S-1. Therefore, we examined whether GS can be recommended for patients with low creatinine clearance (CCr). Renal function was classified by CCr as calculated by the Cockcroft-Gault formula: high CCr (CCr ≥ 80 ml/min) and low CCr (80 > CCr ≥ 50 ml/min). Of 354 patients, 87 patients on GC and 91 on GS were included in the low CCr group, while there were 88 patients on GC and 88 patients on GS in the high CCr group. The HR of overall survival for GS compared with GC was 0.687 (95% CI 0.504-0.937) in the low CCr group. Although the total number of incidences of all Grade 3-4 non-haematological adverse reactions was higher (36.0% vs. 11.8%, p = 0.0002), the number of patients who discontinued treatment was not different (14.1% vs. 16.9%, p = 0.679) for GS compared with GC in the low CCr group. This study suggests that GS should be selected for the treatment of advanced BTC patients with reduced renal function.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34145336     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-92166-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  1 in total

1.  Risk factors for 6-month continuation of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Toru Aoyama; Takaki Yoshikawa; Tsutomu Hayashi; Hiroshi Kuwabara; Yo Mikayama; Takashi Ogata; Haruhiko Cho; Akira Tsuburaya
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 7.370

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.