Literature DB >> 34145333

Large air pressure changes triggered by P-SV ground motion in a cave in northern Taiwan.

Chieh-Hung Chen1,2, Yang-Yi Sun3, Li-Ching Lin4, Peng Han5, Huai-Zhong Yu6, XueMin Zhang7, Chi-Chia Tang3,8, Chun-Rong Chen9, Horng-Yuan Yen10, Cheng-Horng Lin11, Jann-Yenq Liu9,12,13, Ching-Ren Lin11.   

Abstract

Acoustic-gravity waves are generally considered to be one of the major factors that drive changes of the total electron content in the ionosphere. However, causal mechanisms of couplings between sources in the lithosphere and responses in the atmosphere and the ionosphere are not fully understood, yet. A barometer in the cave of the SBCB station records an unusual phenomenon of larger amplitudes in air pressure changes inside than those at the Xinwu station (outside). Accordingly, the comparison between the recorded data at the SBCB and Xinwu station can drive investigations of potential sources of the unusual phenomenon. Analytical results of phase angle differences reveal that the air pressure outside the cave at the Xinwu station often leads air pressure changes inside at the SBCB station at relatively low frequency bands. In contrast, the larger pressure changes at frequencies >  ~ 5 × 10-4 Hz inside the cave at the SBCB station lead smaller changes outside at the Xinwu station. To expose causal mechanisms of the unusual phenomenon, continuous seismic waveforms are further conducted for examination. When the horizontal and vertical ground velocities of ground vibrations yield a difference in the phase angle close to 90°, coherence values between the air pressure changes and ground vibrations become large. This suggests that the pressure-shear vertical ground vibrations can drive air pressure changes. Meanwhile, the results shed light on investigating the existence of acoustic waves near the Earth's surface using a partially confined space underground due to that the assumptions of the waves can propagate upward into the atmosphere driving changes in the ionosphere.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34145333     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-92216-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  1 in total

1.  An odd measure of risk: use and misuse of the odds ratio.

Authors:  W L Holcomb; T Chaiworapongsa; D A Luke; K D Burgdorf
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 7.661

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.