Literature DB >> 34144551

Six Month Mortality in Patients with COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 Viral Pneumonitis Managed with Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Benjamin Garfield1,2, Paolo Bianchi1,2,3, Deepa Arachchillage4,5, Philip Hartley6, Vinci Naruka6, Diana Shroff2, Alexander Law2, Maurizio Passariello1, Brijesh Patel1,2, Susanna Price1,7, Alexander Rosenberg1, Suveer Singh1,7, Richard Trimlett8, Tina Xu1, James Doyle1, Stephane Ledot1,2,3.   

Abstract

A significant proportion of patients with COVID-19 develop acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) with high risk of death. The efficacy of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) for COVID-19 on longer-term outcomes, unlike in other viral pneumonias, is unknown. In this study, we aimed to compare the 6 month mortality of patients receiving VV-ECMO support for COVID-19 with a historical viral ARDS cohort. Fifty-three consecutive patients with COVID-19 ARDS admitted for VV-ECMO to the Royal Brompton Hospital between March 17, 2020 and May 30, 2020 were identified. Mortality, patient characteristics, complications, and ECMO parameters were then compared to a historical cohort of patients with non-COVID-19 viral pneumonia. At 6 months survival was significantly higher in the COVID-19 than in the non-COVID-19 viral pneumonia cohort (84.9% vs. 66.0%, p = 0.040). Patients with COVID-19 had an increased Murray score (3.50 vs. 3.25, p = 0.005), a decreased burden of organ dysfunction (sequential organ failure score score [8.76 vs. 10.42, p = 0.004]), an increased incidence of pulmonary embolism (69.8% vs. 24.5%, p < 0.001) and in those who survived to decannulation longer ECMO runs (19 vs. 11 days, p = 0.001). Our results suggest that survival in patients supported with EMCO for COVID-19 are at least as good as those treated for non-COVID-19 viral ARDS.
Copyright © ASAIO 2021.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34144551     DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001527

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ASAIO J        ISSN: 1058-2916            Impact factor:   2.872


  6 in total

1.  COVID-19 outcomes of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute respiratory failure vs historical cohort of non-COVID-19 viral infections.

Authors:  Sagar B Dave; Ronald Rabinowitz; Aakash Shah; Ali Tabatabai; Samuel M Galvagno; Michael A Mazzeffi; Raymond Rector; David J Kaczorowski; Thomas M Scalea; Jay Menaker
Journal:  Perfusion       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 1.581

Review 2.  Thrombosis and coagulopathy in COVID-19 patients rceiving ECMO: A narrative review of current literature.

Authors:  Hakeem Yusuff; Vasileios Zochios; Daniel Brodie
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  A case of xenon inhalation therapy for respiratory failure and neuropsychiatric disorders associated with COVID-19.

Authors:  Vladimir Vasil'evich Udut; Sergei Alexandrovich Naumov; Diana Nikolaevna Evtushenko; Elena Vladimirovna Udut; Sergei Sergeevich Naumov; Gleb Nikolaevich Zyuz'kov
Journal:  EXCLI J       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 4.068

4.  Thoracic surgery in patients on veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for COVID-19 associated acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  Ioannis Karampinis; Abdullah Al-Shammari; Philip Hartley; Mehul Patel; Deepa R J Arachchillage; Simon Jordan; Louit Thakuria; Ben Garfield; Stephane Ledot; Silviu Buderi
Journal:  Perfusion       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 1.581

5.  Implementing Nurse Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Specialists to Maintain a Sustainable Program.

Authors:  David L Boyd; Giancarlo Lyle-Edrosolo
Journal:  Nurse Lead       Date:  2022-08-11

6.  Ischemic stroke and intracranial hemorrhage in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yu Jin; Yang Zhang; Jinping Liu
Journal:  Perfusion       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 1.581

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.