| Literature DB >> 34144551 |
Benjamin Garfield1,2, Paolo Bianchi1,2,3, Deepa Arachchillage4,5, Philip Hartley6, Vinci Naruka6, Diana Shroff2, Alexander Law2, Maurizio Passariello1, Brijesh Patel1,2, Susanna Price1,7, Alexander Rosenberg1, Suveer Singh1,7, Richard Trimlett8, Tina Xu1, James Doyle1, Stephane Ledot1,2,3.
Abstract
A significant proportion of patients with COVID-19 develop acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) with high risk of death. The efficacy of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) for COVID-19 on longer-term outcomes, unlike in other viral pneumonias, is unknown. In this study, we aimed to compare the 6 month mortality of patients receiving VV-ECMO support for COVID-19 with a historical viral ARDS cohort. Fifty-three consecutive patients with COVID-19 ARDS admitted for VV-ECMO to the Royal Brompton Hospital between March 17, 2020 and May 30, 2020 were identified. Mortality, patient characteristics, complications, and ECMO parameters were then compared to a historical cohort of patients with non-COVID-19 viral pneumonia. At 6 months survival was significantly higher in the COVID-19 than in the non-COVID-19 viral pneumonia cohort (84.9% vs. 66.0%, p = 0.040). Patients with COVID-19 had an increased Murray score (3.50 vs. 3.25, p = 0.005), a decreased burden of organ dysfunction (sequential organ failure score score [8.76 vs. 10.42, p = 0.004]), an increased incidence of pulmonary embolism (69.8% vs. 24.5%, p < 0.001) and in those who survived to decannulation longer ECMO runs (19 vs. 11 days, p = 0.001). Our results suggest that survival in patients supported with EMCO for COVID-19 are at least as good as those treated for non-COVID-19 viral ARDS.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34144551 DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001527
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ASAIO J ISSN: 1058-2916 Impact factor: 2.872