Literature DB >> 34144373

Reappraisal of anticancer nanomedicine design criteria in three types of preclinical cancer models for better clinical translation.

Xin Luan1, Hebao Yuan1, Yudong Song1, Hongxiang Hu1, Bo Wen1, Miao He1, Huixia Zhang1, Yan Li2, Feng Li1, Pan Shu1, Joseph P Burnett1, Nathan Truchan1, Maria Palmisano2, Manjunath P Pai3, Simon Zhou4, Wei Gao5, Duxin Sun6.   

Abstract

Anticancer nanomedicines are designed to improve anticancer efficacy by increasing drug accumulation in tumors through enhanced permeability retention (EPR) effect, and to reduce toxicity by decreasing drug accumulation in normal organs through long systemic circulation. However, the inconsistent efficacy/safety of nanomedicines in cancer patients versus preclinical cancer models have provoked debate for nanomedicine design criteria. In this study, we investigate nanomedicine design criteria in three types of preclinical cancer models using five clinically used nanomedicines, which identifies the factors for better clinical translations of their observed clinical efficacy/safety compared to free drug or clinical micelle formulation. When those nanomedicines were compared with drug solution or clinical micelle formulation in breast tumors, long and short-circulating nanomedicines did not enhance tumor accumulation by EPR effect in transgenic spontaneous breast cancer model regardless of their size or composition, although they improved tumor accumulations in subcutaneous and orthotopic breast cancer models. However, when tumors were compared to normal breast tissue, nanomedicines, drug solution and clinical micelle formulation showed enhanced tumor accumulation regardless of the breast cancer models. In addition, long-circulating nanomedicines did not further increase tumor accumulation in transgenic mouse spontaneous breast cancer nor universally decrease drug accumulations in normal organs; they decreased or increased accumulation in different organs, potentially changing the clinical efficacy/safety. In contrast, short-circulating nanomedicines decreased blood concentration and altered drug distribution in normal organs, which are correlated with their clinical efficacy/safety. A reappraisal of current nanomedicine design criteria is needed to ensure consistent clinical translation for improvement of their clinical efficacy/safety in cancer patients.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical efficacy and adverse events; Delivery efficiency; Enhanced permeability retention (EPR); Long/short circulation; Nanomedicine; Nanoparticle; Preclinical cancer models

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34144373      PMCID: PMC8883361          DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.120910

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  86 in total

1.  Liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin compared with conventional doxorubicin in a randomized multicenter trial as first-line therapy of metastatic breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Lyndsay Harris; Gerald Batist; Robert Belt; Douglas Rovira; Rudolph Navari; Nozar Azarnia; Lauri Welles; Eric Winer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 2.  Albumin-bound paclitaxel: a review of its use for the first-line combination treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Sheridan M Hoy
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Effective targeting of solid tumors in patients with locally advanced cancers by radiolabeled pegylated liposomes.

Authors:  K J Harrington; S Mohammadtaghi; P S Uster; D Glass; A M Peters; R G Vile; J S Stewart
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Extravasation and transcytosis of liposomes in Kaposi's sarcoma-like dermal lesions of transgenic mice bearing the HIV tat gene.

Authors:  S K Huang; F J Martin; G Jay; J Vogel; D Papahadjopoulos; D S Friend
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 5.  Pharmacokinetics of pegylated liposomal Doxorubicin: review of animal and human studies.

Authors:  Alberto Gabizon; Hilary Shmeeda; Yechezkel Barenholz
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 6.  Preclinical imaging and translational animal models of cancer for accelerated clinical implementation of nanotechnologies and macromolecular agents.

Authors:  Raquel De Souza; Tara Spence; Huang Huang; Christine Allen
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 9.776

7.  Peripheral neuropathy induced by paclitaxel: recent insights and future perspectives.

Authors:  Charity D Scripture; William D Figg; Alex Sparreboom
Journal:  Curr Neuropharmacol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 7.363

8.  Tailoring nanoparticle designs to target cancer based on tumor pathophysiology.

Authors:  Edward A Sykes; Qin Dai; Christopher D Sarsons; Juan Chen; Jonathan V Rocheleau; David M Hwang; Gang Zheng; David T Cramb; Kristina D Rinker; Warren C W Chan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Neonatal Fc Receptor (FcRn) Enhances Tissue Distribution and Prevents Excretion of nab-Paclitaxel.

Authors:  Feng Li; Hebao Yuan; Huixia Zhang; Miao He; Jinhui Liao; Nianhang Chen; Yan Li; Simon Zhou; Maria Palmisano; Alex Yu; Manjunath Pai; Duxin Sun
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  Adding vitamin E-TPGS to the formulation of Genexol-PM: specially mixed micelles improve drug-loading ability and cytotoxicity against multidrug-resistant tumors significantly.

Authors:  Zhuoyang Fan; Cheng Chen; Xiaoying Pang; Zhou Yu; Yang Qi; Xinyi Chen; Huihui Liang; Xiaoling Fang; Xianyi Sha
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Nanobiotherapeutic strategies to target immune microenvironment of triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Qing Chang; Liang Chang; Mo Li; Liwen Fan; Shunchao Bao; Xinyu Wang; Linlin Liu
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 5.942

Review 2.  Why 90% of clinical drug development fails and how to improve it?

Authors:  Duxin Sun; Wei Gao; Hongxiang Hu; Simon Zhou
Journal:  Acta Pharm Sin B       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 14.903

Review 3.  Current approaches of nanomedicines in the market and various stage of clinical translation.

Authors:  Xiaoting Shan; Xiang Gong; Jie Li; Jingyuan Wen; Yaping Li; Zhiwen Zhang
Journal:  Acta Pharm Sin B       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 14.903

4.  Structure‒tissue exposure/selectivity relationship (STR) correlates with clinical efficacy/safety.

Authors:  Wei Gao; Hongxiang Hu; Lipeng Dai; Miao He; Hebao Yuan; Huixia Zhang; Jinhui Liao; Bo Wen; Yan Li; Maria Palmisano; Mohamed Dit Mady Traore; Simon Zhou; Duxin Sun
Journal:  Acta Pharm Sin B       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 14.903

5.  Theranostic Nanoplatform with Sequential SDT and ADV Effects in Response to Well-Programmed LIFU Irradiation for Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Jun Zhou; Jingxin Hou; Shuling Liu; Jie Xu; Ying Luo; Jun Zheng; Xin Li; Zhigang Wang; Haitao Ran; Dajing Guo
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2021-12-07

Review 6.  Beyond Formulation: Contributions of Nanotechnology for Translation of Anticancer Natural Products into New Drugs.

Authors:  Rodrigo Dos A Miguel; Amanda S Hirata; Paula C Jimenez; Luciana B Lopes; Leticia V Costa-Lotufo
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 6.525

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.