Dana C Miskulin1, Huan Jiang2, Ambreen Gul2, V Shane Pankratz3, Susan S Paine2, Jennifer J Gassman4, Manisha Jhamb5, Raymond Y Kwong6, Lavinia Negrea7, David W Ploth8, Saeed Kamran Shaffi3, Antonia M Harford2, Philip G Zager2. 1. Division of Nephrology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: dmiskulin@tuftsmedicalcenter.org. 2. Quality Management Department, Dialysis Clinic, Inc, Albuquerque, New Mexico. 3. Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico. 4. Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio. 5. Renal-Electrolyte Division, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 6. Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. 7. Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Case Western Reserve University/University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio. 8. Division of Nephrology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Abstract
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Prior studies of patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis have shown that, on average, blood pressure (BP) measured predialysis is higher than BP measured at home. We hypothesized that a subset of hemodialysis patients has BP that is higher when measured at home than when measured predialysis and this subgroup of patients has a higher prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 97 hypertensive hemodialysis patients enrolled in the Blood Pressure in Dialysis Study (BID), a randomized trial of comparing target predialysis BP ≤140/90 to 155-165/90 mm Hg. EXPOSURE: Differences between predialysis and next-day home systolic BP measured ≥6 times over 1 year. OUTCOME: Left ventricular mass index (LVMI) by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: A hierarchical clustering analysis divided patients into 3 clusters based on the average and variability of differences in systolic predialysis and home BP. Clusters were compared with respect to clinical factors and LVMI. RESULTS: Mean differences between predialysis and home systolic BP were 19.1 (95% CI, 17.0 to 21.1) mm Hg for cluster 1 ("home lower"), 3.7 (95% CI, 1.6 to 5.8) mm Hg for cluster 2 ("home and predialysis similar"), and -9.7 (95% CI, -12.0 to -7.4) mm Hg for cluster 3 ("home higher"). Systolic BP declined during dialysis in clusters 1 and 2 but increased in cluster 3. Interdialytic weight gains did not differ. After adjusting for sex and treatment arm, LVMI was higher in cluster 3 than in clusters 1 and 2: differences in means of 10.6 ± 4.96 (SE) g/m2 (P = 0.04) and 12.0 ± 5.08 g/m2 (P = 0.02), respectively. LIMITATIONS: Limited statistical power. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly one-third of participants had home BPs higher than predialysis BPs. These patients had LVMI higher than those with similar or lower BPs at home, indicating that their BP may have been undertreated.
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Prior studies of patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis have shown that, on average, blood pressure (BP) measured predialysis is higher than BP measured at home. We hypothesized that a subset of hemodialysis patients has BP that is higher when measured at home than when measured predialysis and this subgroup of patients has a higher prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 97 hypertensive hemodialysis patients enrolled in the Blood Pressure in Dialysis Study (BID), a randomized trial of comparing target predialysis BP ≤140/90 to 155-165/90 mm Hg. EXPOSURE: Differences between predialysis and next-day home systolic BP measured ≥6 times over 1 year. OUTCOME: Left ventricular mass index (LVMI) by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: A hierarchical clustering analysis divided patients into 3 clusters based on the average and variability of differences in systolic predialysis and home BP. Clusters were compared with respect to clinical factors and LVMI. RESULTS: Mean differences between predialysis and home systolic BP were 19.1 (95% CI, 17.0 to 21.1) mm Hg for cluster 1 ("home lower"), 3.7 (95% CI, 1.6 to 5.8) mm Hg for cluster 2 ("home and predialysis similar"), and -9.7 (95% CI, -12.0 to -7.4) mm Hg for cluster 3 ("home higher"). Systolic BP declined during dialysis in clusters 1 and 2 but increased in cluster 3. Interdialytic weight gains did not differ. After adjusting for sex and treatment arm, LVMI was higher in cluster 3 than in clusters 1 and 2: differences in means of 10.6 ± 4.96 (SE) g/m2 (P = 0.04) and 12.0 ± 5.08 g/m2 (P = 0.02), respectively. LIMITATIONS: Limited statistical power. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly one-third of participants had home BPs higher than predialysis BPs. These patients had LVMI higher than those with similar or lower BPs at home, indicating that their BP may have been undertreated.
Authors: Gérard M London; Bruno Pannier; Alain P Guerin; Jacques Blacher; Sylvain J Marchais; Bernadette Darne; Fabien Metivier; Hassan Adda; Michel E Safar Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2001-12 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Rajiv Agarwal; Arjun D Sinha; Maria K Pappas; Terri N Abraham; Getachew G Tegegne Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2014-01-06 Impact factor: 5.992
Authors: Rajiv Agarwal; Allen R Nissenson; Daniel Batlle; Daniel W Coyne; J Richard Trout; David G Warnock Journal: Am J Med Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 4.965