Angela Chang1, Michael D Cabana1,2, Taylor N LaFlam1, Saharsh Patel1, Megumi Okumura1,3. 1. Department of Pediatrics and UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA. 2. Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA. 3. Department of Internal Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Abstract
Background: Peanut introduction guidelines have undergone significant reversal since 2001 from recommending delayed introduction to rescinding the recommendations in 2008 to actively recommending early introduction of peanut between 4 and 11 months of age in high-risk infants in 2015. This qualitative study aims to explore pediatrician beliefs, practices, facilitators, and barriers regarding peanut introduction and testing. Methods: General pediatricians from academic, private, large group, and underserved practices in Northern California underwent individual semi-structured interviews in 2017. We asked about experiences surrounding infant peanut introduction, strategies for staying up-to-date with current recommendations, and barriers and facilitators to the new peanut introduction and testing recommendations. The data were coded, and using grounded theory methodology, a conceptual framework was developed around early peanut introduction and testing in infants. Results: Eighteen general pediatricians participated. We identified barriers that may contribute to pediatrician reluctance to recommending early peanut introduction or testing including lack of awareness, lack of agreement, lack of resources, and lack of outcome expectancy. A framework was created that suggests that pediatricians need to be knowledgeable about new recommendations, agree with the recommendations, have resources to carry out the counseling and testing, and have buy-in from the parents in order for successful uptake of peanut introduction guidelines. Conclusion: Recommending early peanut introduction or testing causes significant apprehension in some pediatricians, and there are many barriers to following recent early peanut introduction recommendations. A potential limitation of the study is that it was conducted right after the addendum guidelines were changed, leaving the possibility that attitudes and practices may have evolved since 2017. It is still likely that a multifaceted approach that addresses primary care provider guideline awareness, limited primary care resources for education and testing, and includes support and collaboration from subspecialty practices is more likely to lead to improved early peanut introduction uptake.
Background: Peanut introduction guidelines have undergone significant reversal since 2001 from recommending delayed introduction to rescinding the recommendations in 2008 to actively recommending early introduction of peanut between 4 and 11 months of age in high-risk infants in 2015. This qualitative study aims to explore pediatrician beliefs, practices, facilitators, and barriers regarding peanut introduction and testing. Methods: General pediatricians from academic, private, large group, and underserved practices in Northern California underwent individual semi-structured interviews in 2017. We asked about experiences surrounding infant peanut introduction, strategies for staying up-to-date with current recommendations, and barriers and facilitators to the new peanut introduction and testing recommendations. The data were coded, and using grounded theory methodology, a conceptual framework was developed around early peanut introduction and testing in infants. Results: Eighteen general pediatricians participated. We identified barriers that may contribute to pediatrician reluctance to recommending early peanut introduction or testing including lack of awareness, lack of agreement, lack of resources, and lack of outcome expectancy. A framework was created that suggests that pediatricians need to be knowledgeable about new recommendations, agree with the recommendations, have resources to carry out the counseling and testing, and have buy-in from the parents in order for successful uptake of peanut introduction guidelines. Conclusion: Recommending early peanut introduction or testing causes significant apprehension in some pediatricians, and there are many barriers to following recent early peanut introduction recommendations. A potential limitation of the study is that it was conducted right after the addendum guidelines were changed, leaving the possibility that attitudes and practices may have evolved since 2017. It is still likely that a multifaceted approach that addresses primary care provider guideline awareness, limited primary care resources for education and testing, and includes support and collaboration from subspecialty practices is more likely to lead to improved early peanut introduction uptake.
Entities:
Keywords:
early introduction; food allergy; food allergy prevention; guideline uptake; qualitative research
Authors: David M Fleischer; Scott Sicherer; Matthew Greenhawt; Dianne Campbell; Edmond Chan; Antonella Muraro; Susanne Halken; Yitzhak Katz; Motohiro Ebisawa; Lawrence Eichenfield; Hugh Sampson; Gideon Lack; George Du Toit; Graham Roberts; Henry Bahnson; Mary Feeney; Jonathan Hourihane; Jonathan Spergel; Michael Young; Amal As'aad; Katrina Allen; Susan Prescott; Sandeep Kapur; Hirohisa Saito; Ioana Agache; Cezmi A Akdis; Hasan Arshad; Kirsten Beyer; Anthony Dubois; Philippe Eigenmann; Monserrat Fernandez-Rivas; Kate Grimshaw; Karin Hoffman-Sommergruber; Arne Host; Susanne Lau; Liam O'Mahony; Clare Mills; Nikolaus Papadopoulos; Carina Venter; Nancy Agmon-Levin; Aaron Kessel; Richard Antaya; Beth Drolet; Lanny Rosenwasser Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2015-08-31 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Susan T Vadaparampil; Clement K Gwede; Cathy Meade; Joanne Kelvin; Richard R Reich; Joyce Reinecke; Meghan Bowman; Ivana Sehovic; Gwendolyn P Quinn Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2016-05-17
Authors: Ruchi S Gupta; Elizabeth E Springston; Jennifer S Kim; Bridget Smith; Jacqueline A Pongracic; Xiaobin Wang; Jane Holl Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2009-12-07 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Bertine Mj Flokstra-de Blok; Thys van der Molen; Wianda A Christoffers; Janwillem Wh Kocks; Richard L Oei; Joanne Ng Oude Elberink; Emmy M Roerdink; Marie Louise Schuttelaar; Jantina L van der Velde; Thecla M Brakel; Anthony Ej Dubois Journal: J Asthma Allergy Date: 2017-03-15