Yanting Chen1,2, Guiling Ma3, Yun Hu3, Qiyuan Yang4, Jeanene M Deavila1,2, Mei-Jun Zhu5, Min Du6,7. 1. Center for Reproductive Biology, School of Molecular Biosciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164, USA. 2. Nutrigenoimics and Growth Biology Laboratory, Department of Animal Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164, USA. 3. College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225009, People's Republic of China. 4. Department of Molecular, Cell and Cancer Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, 01655, USA. 5. School of Food Science, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164, USA. 6. Center for Reproductive Biology, School of Molecular Biosciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164, USA. min.du@wsu.edu. 7. Nutrigenoimics and Growth Biology Laboratory, Department of Animal Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164, USA. min.du@wsu.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Perinatal growth abnormalities program susceptibility to childhood obesity, which is further exaggerated by maternal overweight and obesity (MO) during pregnancy. Exercise is highly accessible, but reports about the benefits of maternal exercise on fetal growth and childhood obesity outcomes are inconsistent, reducing the incentives for pregnant women to participate in exercise to improve children's perinatal growth. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to establish evidence-based efficacy of exercise in mothers with normal weight (MNW) and MO during pregnancy in reducing the risks of perinatal growth abnormalities and childhood obesity. In addition, the impacts of exercise volume are also assessed. METHODS: The PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to February 15, 2020. We included randomized controlled trials with exercise-only intervention or exercise with other confounders in pregnant MNW (body mass index, BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m2) and MO (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2), which were further subgrouped in the meta-analysis. Primary outcomes included birth weight, preterm birth, small for gestational age (SGA), large for gestational age (LGA), infant and childhood weight, and childhood obesity. A linear meta-regression analysis was also used to explore the effects of exercise volume on outcomes. RESULTS: 99 studies were included in the meta-analysis (n = 596,876), and individual study quality ranged from fair to good according to the Newcastle-Ottawa scale assessment. Exercise only interventions in MNW reduced preterm birth by 15% (26 studies, n = 76,132; odds ratio [OR] 0.85; 95% CI 0.72, 1.01; I2 = 83.3%), SGA by 17% (33 studies, n = 92,351; OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.71, 0.98; I2 = 74.5%) and LGA by 17% (29 studies, n = 84,310; OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.74, 0.95; I2 = 60.4%). Exercise only interventions in MO reduced preterm birth by 33% (2 studies, n = 3,050; OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.70, 0.96; I2 = 0%), SGA by 27% (8 studies, n = 3,909; OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.50, 1.05; I2 = 40.4%) and LGA by 55% (9 studies, n = 81,581; OR 0.45; 95% CI 0.18, 1.11; I2 = 98.3%). Exercise only interventions in MNW reduced childhood obesity by 53% (3 studies, n = 6,920; OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.36, 0.63; I2 = 77.0%). However, no significant effect was observed in outcomes from exercise confounders in either MNW or MO. In the meta-regression, the volume of exercise-only intervention in MNW was negatively associated with birth weight, greatly driven by volumes more than 810 metabolic equivalents (MET)-min per week. Other outcomes were not associated with exercise volume. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that exercise during pregnancy in both MNW and MO safely and effectively reduce the risks of preterm birth, SGA, and LGA. Furthermore, MNW exercise also reduces the risk of childhood obesity. Overall, regardless of prepregnancy BMI, maternal exercise during pregnancy provides an excellent opportunity to mitigate the high prevalence of adverse birth outcomes and childhood obesity.
BACKGROUND: Perinatal growth abnormalities program susceptibility to childhood obesity, which is further exaggerated by maternal overweight and obesity (MO) during pregnancy. Exercise is highly accessible, but reports about the benefits of maternal exercise on fetal growth and childhood obesity outcomes are inconsistent, reducing the incentives for pregnant women to participate in exercise to improve children's perinatal growth. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to establish evidence-based efficacy of exercise in mothers with normal weight (MNW) and MO during pregnancy in reducing the risks of perinatal growth abnormalities and childhood obesity. In addition, the impacts of exercise volume are also assessed. METHODS: The PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to February 15, 2020. We included randomized controlled trials with exercise-only intervention or exercise with other confounders in pregnant MNW (body mass index, BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m2) and MO (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2), which were further subgrouped in the meta-analysis. Primary outcomes included birth weight, preterm birth, small for gestational age (SGA), large for gestational age (LGA), infant and childhood weight, and childhood obesity. A linear meta-regression analysis was also used to explore the effects of exercise volume on outcomes. RESULTS: 99 studies were included in the meta-analysis (n = 596,876), and individual study quality ranged from fair to good according to the Newcastle-Ottawa scale assessment. Exercise only interventions in MNW reduced preterm birth by 15% (26 studies, n = 76,132; odds ratio [OR] 0.85; 95% CI 0.72, 1.01; I2 = 83.3%), SGA by 17% (33 studies, n = 92,351; OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.71, 0.98; I2 = 74.5%) and LGA by 17% (29 studies, n = 84,310; OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.74, 0.95; I2 = 60.4%). Exercise only interventions in MO reduced preterm birth by 33% (2 studies, n = 3,050; OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.70, 0.96; I2 = 0%), SGA by 27% (8 studies, n = 3,909; OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.50, 1.05; I2 = 40.4%) and LGA by 55% (9 studies, n = 81,581; OR 0.45; 95% CI 0.18, 1.11; I2 = 98.3%). Exercise only interventions in MNW reduced childhood obesity by 53% (3 studies, n = 6,920; OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.36, 0.63; I2 = 77.0%). However, no significant effect was observed in outcomes from exercise confounders in either MNW or MO. In the meta-regression, the volume of exercise-only intervention in MNW was negatively associated with birth weight, greatly driven by volumes more than 810 metabolic equivalents (MET)-min per week. Other outcomes were not associated with exercise volume. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that exercise during pregnancy in both MNW and MO safely and effectively reduce the risks of preterm birth, SGA, and LGA. Furthermore, MNW exercise also reduces the risk of childhood obesity. Overall, regardless of prepregnancy BMI, maternal exercise during pregnancy provides an excellent opportunity to mitigate the high prevalence of adverse birth outcomes and childhood obesity.
Authors: Yao Gao; Liang Zhao; Jun Seok Son; Xiangdong Liu; Yanting Chen; Jeanene Marie Deavila; Mei-Jun Zhu; Gordon K Murdoch; Min Du Journal: Thyroid Date: 2022-05-06 Impact factor: 6.506
Authors: Yan-Ting Chen; Qi-Yuan Yang; Yun Hu; Xiang-Dong Liu; Jeanene M de Avila; Mei-Jun Zhu; Peter W Nathanielsz; Min Du Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2021-11-25 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Rebeca de Castro; Raul Antunes; Diogo Mendes; Anna Szumilewicz; Rita Santos-Rocha Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-04-17 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Stefanie M P Kouwenhoven; Jacqueline Muts; Martijn J J Finken; Johannes B van Goudoever Journal: Nutrients Date: 2022-06-30 Impact factor: 6.706
Authors: Adeline Bockler; Nina Ferrari; Clara Deibert; Anne Flöck; Waltraut M Merz; Ulrich Gembruch; Christina Ehrhardt; Jörg Dötsch; Christine Joisten Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-12-14 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Farah Nawabi; Franziska Krebs; Laura Lorenz; Arim Shukri; Adrienne Alayli; Stephanie Stock Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-01-07 Impact factor: 3.390