Seçil Aksoy1, Umut Aksoy2, Kaan Orhan3,4. 1. Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Near East University, Mersin 10, Turkey. 2. Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Near East University, Mersin 10, Turkey. 3. Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey. call52@yahoo.com. 4. Medical Design Application and Research Center (MEDITAM), Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey. call52@yahoo.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to provide a bibliometric overview of the oral radiology journal output, contents, and leading trends, and also include a detailed authorship analysis by evaluating the top contributors, and their geographic distributions between 1985 and 2020 years. METHODS: The databases available on the Scopus and journal's Web Page were searched to identify the all published articles and reports with no restriction regarding publication year or study design. Seven hundred and seventy-seven articles were included and analyzed for the following bibliometric criteria: publication title, authorship, publication year, coauthors, institution of origin, country of origin, collaborating institution and countries, article category, study field, and number of citations based on the Scopus and Google Scholar. RESULTS: Original article is by far the largest group of study outcome that more than half of the articles were in this category and followed by the case reports (19.8%). The leading countries according to number of the articles were Japan by far (59.8%) followed by Turkey (10.8%) and South Korea (5.2%). The article by Arnheiter, Scarfe, and Farman has received the highest number of citations overall. As first and/or coauthor, Ariji E emerged as a most productive author with 35 publications and Osaka University was determined as the most prominent institutions by publishing the greatest number of articles. More than half of the articles were in the "Diagnosis of Orofacial Diseases" study field. CONCLUSION: This bibliometric analysis provides a comprehensive overall picture of the 35 years of research progress and publication trends in oral radiology.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to provide a bibliometric overview of the oral radiology journal output, contents, and leading trends, and also include a detailed authorship analysis by evaluating the top contributors, and their geographic distributions between 1985 and 2020 years. METHODS: The databases available on the Scopus and journal's Web Page were searched to identify the all published articles and reports with no restriction regarding publication year or study design. Seven hundred and seventy-seven articles were included and analyzed for the following bibliometric criteria: publication title, authorship, publication year, coauthors, institution of origin, country of origin, collaborating institution and countries, article category, study field, and number of citations based on the Scopus and Google Scholar. RESULTS: Original article is by far the largest group of study outcome that more than half of the articles were in this category and followed by the case reports (19.8%). The leading countries according to number of the articles were Japan by far (59.8%) followed by Turkey (10.8%) and South Korea (5.2%). The article by Arnheiter, Scarfe, and Farman has received the highest number of citations overall. As first and/or coauthor, Ariji E emerged as a most productive author with 35 publications and Osaka University was determined as the most prominent institutions by publishing the greatest number of articles. More than half of the articles were in the "Diagnosis of Orofacial Diseases" study field. CONCLUSION: This bibliometric analysis provides a comprehensive overall picture of the 35 years of research progress and publication trends in oral radiology.
Authors: Kirstin R W Matthews; Erin Yang; Steven W Lewis; Brandon R Vaidyanathan; Monica Gorman Journal: Account Res Date: 2020-06-09 Impact factor: 2.622
Authors: Adam A Dmytriw; Nicholas Hui; Telvinderjit Singh; Damian Nguyen; Nima Omid-Fard; Kevin Phan; Anish Kapadia Journal: Clin Imaging Date: 2020-11-06 Impact factor: 1.605