Literature DB >> 34143241

Cognitive and motor task performance under single- and dual-task conditions: effects of consecutive versus concurrent practice.

Rainer Beurskens1, Dennis Brueckner2, Hagen Voigt2, Thomas Muehlbauer2.   

Abstract

The concurrent execution of two or more tasks simultaneously results in performance decrements in one or both conducted tasks. The practice of dual-task (DT) situations has been shown to decrease performance decrements. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of consecutive versus concurrent practice on cognitive and motor task performance under single-task (ST) and DT conditions. Forty-five young adults (21 females, 24 males) were randomly assigned to either a consecutive practice (INT consecutive) group, a concurrent practice (INT concurrent) group or a control (CON) group (i.e., no practice). Both INT groups performed 2 days of acquisition, i.e., practicing a cognitive and a motor task either consecutively or concurrently. The cognitive task required participants to perform an auditory stroop task and the number of correct responses was used as outcome measure. In the motor task, participants were asked to stand on a stabilometer and to keep the platform as close to horizontal as possible. The time in balance was calculated for further analysis. Pre- and post-practice testing included performance assessment under ST (i.e., cognitive task only, motor task only) and DT (i.e., cognitive and motor task simultaneously) test conditions. Pre-practice testing revealed no significant group differences under ST and DT test conditions neither for the cognitive nor the motor task measure. During acquisition, both INT groups improved their cognitive and motor task performance. The post-practice testing showed significantly better cognitive and motor task values under ST and DT test conditions for the two INT groups compared to the CON group. Further comparisons between the two INT groups revealed better motor but not cognitive task values in favor of the INT consecutive practice group (ST: p = 0.022; DT: p = 0.002). We conclude that consecutive and concurrent practice resulted in better cognitive (ST condition) and motor (ST and DT test conditions) task performance than no practice. In addition, consecutive practice resulted in superior motor task performance (ST and DT test conditions) compared to concurrent practice and is, therefore, recommended when executing DT practice schedules.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory stroop task; Human; Postural control; Skill acquisition; Stabilometer

Year:  2021        PMID: 34143241     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-021-06130-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  13 in total

1.  Walking while talking: Young adults flexibly allocate resources between speech and gait.

Authors:  Tiphanie E Raffegeau; Jeffrey M Haddad; Jessica E Huber; Shirley Rietdyk
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2018-05-26       Impact factor: 2.840

2.  Association of balance, strength, and power measures in young adults.

Authors:  Thomas Muehlbauer; Albert Gollhofer; Urs Granacher
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  An auditory Stroop effect for pitch, loudness, and time.

Authors:  A L Morgan; J F Brandt
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  Training conquers multitasking costs by dividing task representations in the frontoparietal-subcortical system.

Authors:  K G Garner; Paul E Dux
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Influence of concurrent tasks on gait: a dual-task approach.

Authors:  G Ebersbach; M R Dimitrijevic; W Poewe
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1995-08

6.  How does practice reduce dual-task interference: integration, automatization, or just stage-shortening?

Authors:  Eric Ruthruff; Mark Van Selst; James C Johnston; Roger Remington
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-11-17

7.  Effects of Single Compared to Dual Task Practice on Learning a Dynamic Balance Task in Young Adults.

Authors:  Rainer Kiss; Dennis Brueckner; Thomas Muehlbauer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-03-12

8.  Effects of Motor Versus Cognitive Task Prioritization During Dual-Task Practice on Dual-Task Performance in Young Adults.

Authors:  Rainer Beurskens; Dennis Brueckner; Thomas Muehlbauer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-11-12

9.  Posture and Texting: Effect on Balance in Young Adults.

Authors:  Nurul Retno Nurwulan; Bernard C Jiang; Hardianto Iridiastadi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Effects of multitasking-training on gray matter structure and resting state neural mechanisms.

Authors:  Hikaru Takeuchi; Yasuyuki Taki; Rui Nouchi; Hiroshi Hashizume; Atsushi Sekiguchi; Yuka Kotozaki; Seishu Nakagawa; Carlos Makoto Miyauchi; Yuko Sassa; Ryuta Kawashima
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.