| Literature DB >> 34142955 |
Teera Kusolsuk1, Kittipong Chaisiri1, Akkarin Poodeepiyasawad1, Surapol Sa-Nguankiat1, Nirundorn Homsuwan1, Tetsuya Yanagida2, Munehiro Okamoto3, Dorn Watthanakulpanich1, Jitra Waikagul1, Paron Dekumyoy1, Chalit Komalamisra4, Akira Ito5.
Abstract
Taeniasis remains a prevalent public health problem in Thailand. National helminthiasis surveys report only the incidence of Taenia spp. eggs. The ability to differentiate Taenia species using morphological and molecular techniques is vital for epidemiological surveys. This study detected taeniasis carriers and other helminthic infections by Kato's thick smear technique and identified the Taenia species by multiplex PCR. The study subjects were the ethnic Karen people in Tha Song Yang District, Tak Province, Thailand, bordering Myanmar. In total, 983 faecal samples from villagers were examined for helminthiases. Interview-based questionnaires were used to gather information on possible risk factors for infection. The prevalence of helminth infections was 42.7% (420/983), including single (37.3%, 367/983) and mixed infections (5.4%, 53/983). The most common infection (19.23%, 189/983) was Ascaris lumbricoides, whereas taeniasis carriers comprised 2.8% (28/983). Multiplex PCR of Cox1 was used for species identification of Taenia tapeworms, eggs, or both in 22 taeniasis carriers. Most of the parasites (20 cases) were Taenia solium, with two cases of Taenia saginata. Taenia saginata asiatica was not found in the villagers examined. The analysis of 314 completed questionnaires showed that a statistically significant (p < 0.05) risk of taeniasis was correlated with being male, a history of being allowed to forage during childhood, a history of seeing tapeworm proglottids, and a history of raw or undercooked pork consumption. Health education programmes must seek to reduce and prevent reinfection in these communities. © T. Kusolsuk et al., published by EDP Sciences, 2021.Entities:
Keywords: Epidemiological survey; Kato’s thick smear; PCR; Taeniasis
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34142955 PMCID: PMC8212811 DOI: 10.1051/parasite/2021041
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasite ISSN: 1252-607X Impact factor: 3.000
Prevalence of helminths in males and females among villagers. A and B are single and mixed infection cases, respectively.
| Sex | No. faeces examined | Helminthic infection rate | Single infection rate | Single infection (A) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Al | Tt | Hw | Tae | MIF | |||||||||
| Male | 395 | 177 (44.8%) | 157 (39.7%) | 58 (14.7%) | 39 (9.9%) | 35 (8.9%) | 20 (5.1%) | 5 (1.3%) | |||||
| Female | 588 | 243 (41.3%) | 210 (35.7%) | 131 (22.3%) | 23 (3.9%) | 36 (6.1%) | 8 (1.4%) | 12 (2.0%) | |||||
| Total | 983 | 420 (42.7%) | 367 (37.3%) | 189 (19.2%) | 62 (6.3%) | 71 (7.2%) | 28 (2.8%) | 17 (1.7%) | |||||
| Sex | No. of faeces examined | Mixed infections | Type of mixed infection (B) | ||||||||||
| Al-Tt | Al-Hw | Tae-Al | Tt-Hw | Tae-Hw | Tt-MIF | Tae-MIF | Tae-Al-Tt | Al-Tt-Hw | Tt-Hw-MIF | Tae-Tt-Hw | |||
| Male | 395 | 20 (5.1%) | 7 (1.8%) | 3 (0.8%) | 0 | 4 (1.0%) | 2 (0.5%) | 0 | 1 (0.3%) | 0 | 4 (1.0%) | 0 | 0 |
| Female | 588 | 33 (5.6%) | 9 (1.5%) | 8 (1.3%) | 3 (0.5%) | 3 (0.5%) | 0 | 2 (0.3%) | 0 | 1 (0.2%) | 3 (0.5%) | 2 (0.3%) | 1 (0.2%) |
| Total | 983 | 53 (5.4%) | 16 (1.6%) | 11 (1.1%) | 3 (0.3%) | 7 (0.7%) | 2 (0.2%) | 2 (0.2%) | 1 (0.1%) | 1 (0.1%) | 7 (0.7%) | 2 (0.2%) | 1 (0.1%) |
Al: Ascaris lumbricoides; Tt: Trichuris trichiura; Hw: hookworm; Tae: Taenia spp.; MIF: minute intestinal flukes.
Age distribution and prevalence of helminths in population. A and B are single and mixed infection cases, respectively.
| Age group | No. of faeces examined | Helminthic infection rates | Single infection rates | Single infection (A) | Mixed infections (B) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Al | Tt | Hw | Tae | MIF | |||||||||
| <15 | 18 (1.8%) | 10/18 (55.6%) | 9 (50.0%) | 7 (38.9%) | 2 (11.1%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (5.6%) | ||||
| 15–25 | 178 (18.1%) | 74/178 (41.6%) | 68 (38.2%) | 40 (22.5%) | 11 (6.2%) | 9 (5.0%) | 4 (2.2%) | 1 (0.6%) | 6 (3.4%) | ||||
| 26–35 | 256 (26.0%) | 95/256 (37.1%) | 81 (31.6%) | 37 (14.5%) | 17 (6.6%) | 14 (5.5%) | 8 (3.1%) | 4 (1.6%) | 14 (5.5%) | ||||
| 36–45 | 257 (26.1%) | 108/257 (42.0%) | 98 (38.1%) | 48 (18.7%) | 13 (5.0%) | 28 (10.9%) | 9 (3.5%) | 4 (1.6%) | 10 (3.9%) | ||||
| 46–55 | 145 (14.8%) | 66/145 (44.5%) | 53 (36.6%) | 28 (19.3%) | 8 (5.5%) | 7 (4.8%) | 5 (3.4%) | 5 (3.4%) | 13 (9.0%) | ||||
| 56–65 | 86 (8.7%) | 45/86 (52.3%) | 40 (46.5%) | 24 (27.9%) | 6 (7.0%) | 10 (11.6%) | 1 (1.2%) | 0 | 5 (5.8%) | ||||
| >65 | 43 (4.4%) | 22/43 (51.2%) | 18 (41.9%) | 5 (11.6%) | 5 (11.6%) | 3 (7.0%) | 1 (2.3%) | 3 (7.0%) | 4 (9.3%) | ||||
| Age group | No. of faeces examined | Mixed infections | Type of mixed infection (B) | ||||||||||
| Al-Tt | Al-Hw | Tae-Al | Tt-Hw | Tae-Hw | Tt-MIF | Tae-MIF | Tae-Al-Tt | Al-Tt-Hw | Tt-Hw-MIF | Tae-Tt-Hw | |||
| <15 | 18 (1.8%) | 1 (5.5%) | 1 (5.5%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 15–25 | 178 (18.1%) | 6 (3.4%) | 3 (4.1%) | 1 (0.6%) | 0 | 1 (0.6%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (0.6%) | 0 | 0 |
| 26–35 | 256 (26.0%) | 14 (5.5%) | 2 (0.8%) | 2 (0.8%) | 2 (0.8%) | 4 (1.6%) | 1 (0.4%) | 0 | 0 | 1 (0.4%) | 2 (0.8%) | 0 | 0 |
| 36–45 | 257 (26.1%) | 10 (3.9%) | 3 (1.2%) | 2 (0.8%) | 0 | 1 (0.4%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 (1.2%) | 0 | 1 (0.4%) |
| 46–55 | 145 (14.6%) | 13 (9.0%) | 5 (3.4%) | 3 (2.1%) | 1 (0.7%) | 1 (0.7%) | 0 | 1 (0.7%) | 1 (0.7%) | 0 | 1 (0.7%) | 0 | 0 |
| 56–65 | 86 (8.7%) | 5 (5.8%) | 1 (1.2%) | 3 (3.5%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (1.2%) | 0 | 0 |
| >65 | 43 (4.4%) | 4 (9.3%) | 1 (2.3%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (2.3%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 (4.7%) | 0 |
Al: Ascaris lumbricoides; Tt: Trichuris trichiura; Hw: hookworm; Tae: Taenia spp.; MIF: minute intestinal flukes.
Profiles of 28 Taenia carriers.
| No. | Sex | Age | History of eating raw meat | Type of testing | Morphological examination | PCR of adult worm | PCR of faecal eggs | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pork | Beef | ||||||||||||
| 1 | M | 36 | Y | N | DW | Y | N | Y | N | N | NA | NA | NA |
| 2 | M | 16 | Y | N | DW | Y | N | Y | N | N | NA | NA | NA |
| 3 | M | 36 | Y | N | FT | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | Y | N | N |
| 4 | F | 28 | Y | Y | FT | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | Y | N | N |
| 5 | F | 31 | Y | N | FT | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | Y | N | N |
| 6 | F | 29 | Y | N | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| 7 | F | 28 | Y | N | DW | NA | NA | Y | N | N | NA | NA | NA |
| 8 | F | 31 | Y | N | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| 9 | M | 56 | Y | N | DW | NA | NA | Y | N | N | NA | NA | NA |
| 10 | M | 16 | Y | N | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| 11 | M | 45 | Y | N | DW | NA | NA | Y | N | N | NA | NA | NA |
| 12 | M | 67 | Y | N | DW | Y | N | Y | N | N | NA | NA | NA |
| 13 | F | 25 | Y | N | FT | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | Y | N | N |
| 14 | M | 36 | Y | N | FT | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | Y | N | N |
| 15 | M | 51 | Y | N | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| 16 | F | 34 | Y | Y | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| 17 | M | 36 | Y | N | FT | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | Y | N | N |
| 18 | M | 15 | Y | Y | DW | N | Y | N | Y | N | N | N | N |
| 19 | F | 54 | Y | N | FT | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | Y | N | N |
| 20 | M | 51 | Y | N | DW | Y | N | Y | N | N | NA | NA | NA |
| 21 | M | 54 | Y | N | DW | Y | N | Y | N | N | NA | NA | NA |
| 22 | F | 36 | Y | Y | FT | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | N | Y | N |
| 23 | F | 32 | Y | N | DW | NA | NA | Y | N | N | NA | NA | NA |
| 24 | M | 46 | Y | Y | DW | NA | NA | Y | N | N | NA | NA | NA |
| 25 | M | 41 | Y | N | DW | NA | NA | Y | N | N | NA | NA | NA |
| 26 | M | 37 | Y | N | DW | NA | NA | Y | N | N | NA | NA | NA |
| 27 | M | 32 | Y | N | FT | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | Y | N | N |
| 28 | M | 44 | Y | N | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
M: male; F: female; Y, yes; N, no; NA, not accessible; DW, deworm; FT, faecal test mPCR, T. sol = Taenia solium; T. sag = Taenia saginata; T. sag. asia = Taenia saginata asiatica.
Figure 1Nineteen Taenia solium tapeworms expelled from a 67-year-old Karen male patient (A). Macro-morphology of 19 tapeworms: Round scolices were observed in 19 worms. Morphology of the scolex of an intact worm (40×): The scolex was characterized by two rows of hooklets (the black arrow referred) on the rostellum besides four suckers (B).
Demographic data of villagers participating in the questionnaire survey in the three villages studied.
| Variables | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | |||
| Male | 118 (37.3%) | ||
| Female | 198 (62.7%) | ||
| Variables | Male | Female | Total ( |
| Age group | |||
| <20 years old | 10 (3.2%) | 10 (3.2%) | 20 (6.3%) |
| 20–40 years old | 42 (13.3%) | 107 (33.7%) | 149 (47.2%) |
| 41–60 years old | 58 (18.4%) | 65 (20.6%) | 123 (38.9%) |
| >60 years old | 8 (2.5%) | 16 (5.1%) | 24 (7.6%) |
| Occupation | |||
| Agriculture | 55 (17.4%) | 56 (17.7%) | 111 (35.1%) |
| Merchant | 3 (0.9%) | 6 (1.9%) | 9 (2.8%) |
| Student | 10 (3.2%) | 10 (3.2%) | 20 (6.3%) |
| Labourer | 37 (11.7%) | 21 (6.6%) | 58 (18.4%) |
| Housewife/Steward | 13 (4.1%) | 105 (33.2%) | 118 (37.3%) |
Occurrence of taeniasis in relation to risk factors.
| Risk factor ( | Taeniasis | Odds ratio (95% CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | |||
| Sex | ||||
| Male (118) | 19 | 99 | 4.030 (1.758–9.239) | 0.001* |
| Female (198) | 9 | 189 | ||
| Age | ||||
| <30 (55) | 6 | 49 | 1.330 (0.513–3.452) | 0.556 |
| ≥30 (261) | 22 | 239 | ||
| Raising Pigs | ||||
| Yes (194) | 25 | 169 | 5.868 (1.732–19.882) | 0.001* |
| No (122) | 3 | 119 | ||
| Method of raising pigs | ||||
| Free (86) | 19 | 67 | 7.562 (2.892–19.772) | 0.001* |
| Crated/Restrained (166) | 6 | 160 | ||
| History of faecal excretion of tapeworm proglottids | ||||
| Yes (90) | 17 | 73 | 4.552 (2.038–10.166) | 0.001* |
| No (226) | 11 | 215 | ||
| History of raw pork consumption | ||||
| Yes (234) | 26 | 208 | 5.000 (1.160 – 21.555) | 0.022* |
| No (82) | 2 | 80 | ||
| History of raw beef consumption | ||||
| Yes (86) | 11 | 75 | 1.838 (0.823 – 4.101) | 0.180 |
| No (228) | 17 | 213 | ||
| Method of defecation | ||||
| Open defecation (46) | 5 | 41 | 1.310 (0.471–3.639) | 0.604 |
| Toilet (270) | 23 | 247 | ||
Figure 2Tha Song Yang District, Tak Province, Thailand, area of the research studied (A). The distribution of 28 taeniasis carriers and number of pigs among three sub-villages (Nong Bua, Klur Klor and Tala Okar), Mae U-Su Sub District, Tha Song Yang District, Tak Province using GIS mapping (B).