Literature DB >> 34142828

PyAutoFEP: An Automated Free Energy Perturbation Workflow for GROMACS Integrating Enhanced Sampling Methods.

Luan Carvalho Martins1, Elio A Cino2, Rafaela Salgado Ferreira2.   

Abstract

Free energy perturbation (FEP) calculations are now routinely used in drug discovery to estimate the relative FEB (RFEB) of small molecules to a biomolecular target of interest. Using enhanced sampling can improve the correlation between predictions and experimental data, especially in systems with conformational changes. Due to the large number of perturbations required in drug discovery campaigns, the manual setup of FEP calculations is no longer viable. Here, we introduce PyAutoFEP, a flexible and open-source tool to aid the setup of RFEB FEP. PyAutoFEP is written in Python3, and automates the generation of perturbation maps, dual topologies, system building and molecular dynamics (MD), and analysis. PyAutoFEP supports multiple force fields, incorporates replica exchange with solute tempering (REST) and replica exchange with solute scaling (REST2) enhanced sampling methods, and allows flexible λ values along perturbation windows. To validate PyAutoFEP, it was applied to a set of 14 Farnesoid X receptor ligands, a system included in the drug design data resource grand challenge 2. An 88% mean correct sign prediction was achieved, and 75% of the predictions had an error below 1.5 kcal/mol. Results using Amber03/GAFF, CHARMM36m/CGenFF, and OPLS-AA/M/LigParGen had Pearson's r values of 0.71 ± 0.13, 0.30 ± 0.27, and 0.66 ± 0.20, respectively. The Amber03/GAFF and OPLS-AA/M/LigParGen results were on par with the top grand challenge 2 submissions. Applying REST2 improved the results using CHARMM36m/CGenFF (Pearson's r = 0.43 ± 0.21) but had little impact on the other force fields. CHARMM36-YF and CHARMM36-WYF modifications did not yield improved predictions compared to CHARMM36m. Finally, we estimated the probability of finding a molecule 1 pKi better than a lead when using PyAutoFEP to screen 10 or 100 analogues. The probabilities, when compared to random sampling, increased up to sevenfold when 100 molecules were to be screened, suggesting that PyAutoFEP would likely be useful for lead optimization. PyAutoFEP is available on GitHub at https://github.com/lmmpf/PyAutoFEP.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34142828     DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  4 in total

1.  RestraintMaker: a graph-based approach to select distance restraints in free-energy calculations with dual topology.

Authors:  Benjamin Ries; Salomé Rieder; Clemens Rhiner; Philippe H Hünenberger; Sereina Riniker
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 4.179

2.  Alchemical Free Energy Methods Applied to Complexes of the First Bromodomain of BRD4.

Authors:  Ellen E Guest; Luis F Cervantes; Stephen D Pickett; Charles L Brooks; Jonathan D Hirst
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 6.162

3.  Insights into glyphosate removal efficiency using a new 2D nanomaterial.

Authors:  Leila Razavi; Heidar Raissi; Farzaneh Farzad
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 3.361

4.  Correction Schemes for Absolute Binding Free Energies Involving Lipid Bilayers.

Authors:  Zhiyi Wu; Philip C Biggin
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 6.578

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.