Ute Nazet1, Patrick Neubert2, Valentin Schatz2, Susanne Grässel3, Peter Proff4, Jonathan Jantsch2, Agnes Schröder4, Christian Kirschneck4. 1. Department of Orthodontics, University Medical Centre of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany. ute.nazet@ukr.de. 2. Institute of Clinical Microbiology and Hygiene, University Hospital of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany. 3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Experimental Orthopaedics, Centre for Medical Biotechnology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany. 4. Department of Orthodontics, University Medical Centre of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Apart from other risk factors, mechanical stress on joints can promote the development of osteoarthritis (OA), which can also affect the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), resulting in cartilage degeneration and synovitis. Synovial fibroblasts (SF) play an important role in upkeeping joint homeostasis and OA pathogenesis, but mechanical stress as a risk factor might act differently depending on the type of joint. We thus investigated the relative impact of mechanical stress on the gene expression pattern of SF from TMJs and knee joints to provide new insights into OA pathogenesis. METHODS: Primary SF isolated from TMJs and knee joints of mice were exposed to mechanical strain of varying magnitudes. Thereafter, the expression of marker genes of the extracellular matrix (ECM), inflammation and bone remodelling were analysed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). RESULTS: SF from the knee joints showed increased expression of genes associated with ECM remodelling, inflammation and bone remodelling after mechanical loading, whereas TMJ-derived SF showed reduced expression of genes associated with inflammation and bone remodelling. SF from the TMJ differed from knee-derived SF with regard to expression of ECM, inflammatory and osteoclastogenesis-promoting marker genes during mechanical strain. CONCLUSIONS: Osteoarthritis-related ECM remodelling markers experience almost no changes in strain-induced gene expression, whereas inflammation and bone remodelling processes seem to differ depending on synovial fibroblast origin. Our data indicate that risk factors for the development and progression of osteoarthritis such as mechanical overuse have a different pathological impact in the TMJ compared to the knee joint.
PURPOSE: Apart from other risk factors, mechanical stress on joints can promote the development of osteoarthritis (OA), which can also affect the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), resulting in cartilage degeneration and synovitis. Synovial fibroblasts (SF) play an important role in upkeeping joint homeostasis and OA pathogenesis, but mechanical stress as a risk factor might act differently depending on the type of joint. We thus investigated the relative impact of mechanical stress on the gene expression pattern of SF from TMJs and knee joints to provide new insights into OA pathogenesis. METHODS: Primary SF isolated from TMJs and knee joints of mice were exposed to mechanical strain of varying magnitudes. Thereafter, the expression of marker genes of the extracellular matrix (ECM), inflammation and bone remodelling were analysed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). RESULTS: SF from the knee joints showed increased expression of genes associated with ECM remodelling, inflammation and bone remodelling after mechanical loading, whereas TMJ-derived SF showed reduced expression of genes associated with inflammation and bone remodelling. SF from the TMJ differed from knee-derived SF with regard to expression of ECM, inflammatory and osteoclastogenesis-promoting marker genes during mechanical strain. CONCLUSIONS: Osteoarthritis-related ECM remodelling markers experience almost no changes in strain-induced gene expression, whereas inflammation and bone remodelling processes seem to differ depending on synovial fibroblast origin. Our data indicate that risk factors for the development and progression of osteoarthritis such as mechanical overuse have a different pathological impact in the TMJ compared to the knee joint.
Authors: X Alomar; J Medrano; J Cabratosa; J A Clavero; M Lorente; I Serra; J M Monill; A Salvador Journal: Semin Ultrasound CT MR Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 1.875
Authors: Arjen B Blom; Peter L van Lent; Sten Libregts; Astrid E Holthuysen; Peter M van der Kraan; Nico van Rooijen; Wim B van den Berg Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2007-01
Authors: Mukundan Attur; Hua Zhou; Johathan Samuels; Svetlana Krasnokutsky; Michelle Yau; Jose U Scher; Michael Doherty; Anthony G Wilson; Jenny Bencardino; Marc Hochberg; Joanne M Jordan; Braxton Mitchell; Virginia B Kraus; Steven B Abramson Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2019-12-18 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Holly T Philpott; Trevor B Birmingham; Benoit Fiset; Logan A Walsh; Mitchell C Coleman; Cheryle A Séguin; C Thomas Appleton Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-10-17 Impact factor: 4.996