| Literature DB >> 34141926 |
M Alguacil1, J Núñez-Pomar1, F Calabuig1, P Escamilla-Fajardo1, I Staskeviciute-Butiene2.
Abstract
Brand perception is a key element in achieving business success: how a brand is perceived by current and potential users determines what they think and their disposition towards the brand. The users' perception also determines whether they will perceive the sports service as offering a greater quality or value than other services, whether they will be more loyal, or whether they will recommend the service. This paper analyses the brand perception of users of a public sports service, creating a model of structural equations that analyses how credibility and trust influence a user's congruence with the brand and the generation of positive attitudes towards the brand and how these variables influence loyalty levels and recommendations. The results indicate that the proposed model can explain the variables of trust, congruence, attitudes, loyalty and word of mouth by more than 60%. The study finds that credibility influences trust but that credibility in itself does not cause a congruence with the brand, whereas trust does. Similarly, trust does not generate attitudes towards the brand but credibility and congruence do. Congruence generates loyalty but attitudes do not, and congruence, attitudes and loyalty influence recommendation to a similar extent, with congruence having the highest influence.Entities:
Keywords: Brand perception; Loyalty; Marketing; Sports services; Word-of-mouth
Year: 2021 PMID: 34141926 PMCID: PMC8188372 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07163
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Instrument.
| Dimension | Item |
|---|---|
| Credibility | This service delivers what is promises |
| The claims about its service are believable | |
| This brand has a name you can trust | |
| Trust | I trust this brand |
| X is an honest brand | |
| I rely this brand | |
| Congruence | The image of this service is consistent with my own self-image |
| Using this service reflects who I am | |
| People similar to me use this service | |
| The kind of person who typically uses this service is very much like me | |
| Attitudes | I like X brand |
| X is a very good brand | |
| I have favourable disposition toward X | |
| Loyalty | I consider myself to be loyal to this service |
| This service would be my first choice | |
| I will not attend to other services as long as I can access this one | |
| WOM | I say positive things about going to this service to other people |
| I recommend going to this service to someone who seeks my advice | |
| I encourage friends and relatives to go to this service |
Figure 1Structural model.
Figure 2Results of the structural model.
Summary of hypotheses.
| Hypotheses | β | T value | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| H1. Credibility→Trust | .79 | 15.69 | Supported |
| H2. Credibility→Congruence | .11 | 1.63 | Not Supported |
| H3. Credibility→Attitudes | .71 | 9.66 | Supported |
| H4. Trust→Congruence | .73 | 10.15 | Supported |
| H5. Trust→Attitudes | .03 | .34 | Not Supported |
| H6. Congruence→Attitudes | .18 | 2.57 | Supported |
| H7. Congruence→Loyalty | .73 | 10.43 | Supported |
| H8. Congruence→WOM | .30 | 3.58 | Supported |
| H9. Attitudes→Loyalty | .11 | 1.92 | Not Supported |
| H10. Attitudes→WOM | .28 | 4.84 | Supported |
| H11. Loyalty→WOM | .28 | 3.70 | Supported |
T > 1.96 (Veasna et al., 2013).