Literature DB >> 34141844

Data supporting a pilot high-throughput screen of a drug library for identification of DYRK1A inhibitors and high-content imaging analysis of identified harmine analogs.

Michael Tarpley1, Helen Oladapo1,2, Thomas B Caligan1, Rob U Onyenwoke1,3, Kevin P Williams1,3.   

Abstract

The data presented in this article support the accompanying research article "Identification of harmine and β-carboline analogs from a high-throughput screen of an approved drug collection; profiling as differential inhibitors of DYRK1A and monoamine oxidase A and for in vitro and in vivo anti-cancer studies" [1]. As DYRK1A (dual-specificity tyrosine phosphorylation-regulated kinase 1a) plays a role in the pathophysiology of a number of diseases including diabetes, cancer and neurodegeneration [2], [3], [4], the identification of DYRK1A inhibitors is of significant interest. This data article details the hits identified from a DYRK1A high-throughput screen of a small molecule compound library containing over 95% approved drugs. Twenty-two compounds were identified with >50% inhibition, including harmine and four of its analogs. Subsequent profiling of these harmine analogs using glioma cancer cell lines and high-content image analysis identified those with effects on growth and cytotoxicity.
© 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer cells; Cytotoxicity; DYRK1A; Glioma; Harmine; High-content imaging; High-throughput screening

Year:  2021        PMID: 34141844      PMCID: PMC8187839          DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2021.107189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Data Brief        ISSN: 2352-3409


Specifications Table

Value of the Data

A small scale chemical screen identified small molecule inhibitors of DYRK1A such as harmine along with several of its analogs, which had differential activity in cancer cell models. These raw data will benefit researchers in the fields of drug discovery and cancer biology. These data will be of interest to those researchers exploring the harmine chemical scaffold for its anti-cancer potential.

Data Description

The data reported in this paper provide additional data to our recently published article “Identification of harmine and β-carboline analogs from a high-throughput screen of an approved drug collection; profiling as differential inhibitors of DYRK1A and monoamine oxidase A and for in vitro and in vivo anti-cancer studies” (Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 162 (2021) 105821. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2021.105821) [1]. Table 1 lists a dataset for all 22 hits (Prestwick ID, chemical structure and name) from a pilot high-throughput screen of a library of approved compounds versus the kinase DYRK1A and lists those compounds having percent inhibition values >50%, including harmine and 4 of its analogs (harmol, harmaline, harmane and harmalol). Harmine, the 4 analogs from HTS and 2 additional purchased analogs (norhamane and tetrahydroharmine) (structures shown in Fig. 1) were assessed for effects on growth and cytotoxicity of two glioma cancer cell lines (H4 and U87). Fig. 2 shows the analyzed data and the effect of the harmine analogs on the proliferation of glioma cell lines H4 and U87, as assessed by PrestoBlue assay. Fig. 3 shows analyzed high-content imaging data and the effects of harmine anlogs on nuclear count and size (Hoechst) and plasma membrane integrity (nuclear YOYO-1). Fig. 3 also includes representative images for these data. Cell data on harmine and harmol are primarily included in [1]. The raw data are deposited at https://doi.org/10.17632/3r9r4s5yvm.1.
Table 1

Hits from Prestwick Chemical Library Screen of DYRK1A.

No.Prestwick ID Identifier aInitial Screen (% Inhibition)StructureChemical NameRepeat Screen (% Inhibition) b
1PWK-43348474Image, table 1Harmine hydrochloride99
2PWK-43348378Image, table 1Harmol hydrochloride monohydrate98
3PWK-43329792Image, table 1Chicago sky blue 6B95
4PWK-43333788Image, table 1Myricetin93
5PWK-43337983Image, table 1Quercetine dihydrate93
6PWK-43365866Image, table 1Merbromin91
7PWK-43348574Image, table 1Ellipticine91
8PWK-43297499Image, table 1Nocodazole91
9PWK-43348181Image, table 1Harmaline hydrochloride dihydrate86
10PWK-43374055Image, table 1Luteolin84
11PWK-43349171Image, table 1Harmane hydrochloride78
12PWK-43383352Image, table 1Methacycline hydrochloride77
13PWK-43328694Image, table 1Apigenin76
14PWK-43348279Image, table 1Harmalol hydrochloride dihydrate74
15PWK-43325794Image, table 1Mitoxantrone dihydrochloride73
16PWK-43375955Image, table 1Chrysin72
17PWK-43332888Image, table 1Meclocycline sulfosalicylate71
18PWK-43309198Image, table 1Mebendazole71
19PWK-43396651Image, table 1Kaempferol58
20PWK-43380554Image, table 1Bephenium hydroxynaphthoate55
21PWK-43347182Image, table 1Boldine54
22PWK-43370659Image, table 1Tetrahydroxy-1,4-quinone monohydrate51

Chemical identifier number provided by Prestwick Corporation.

Hits defined as >50% inhibition in two independent replicate screens.

Fig. 1

Chemical structures of harmine and anlaogs identified from DYRK1A inhibition screen. Structures were downloaded using JChem database.

Fig 2

Cell proliferation assay data for hamine analogs. Glioma cancer cells H4 (A) and U87 (B) were incubated with harmine analogs in dose response (0.0001 – 25 µM) with proliferation assessed using PrestoBlue. For each concentration, percent inhibition values were calculated, and data were normalized to DMSO vehicle. Dose response curves were plotted, and IC50 values were determined using Prism GraphPad 7.0.

Fig 3

High-content cell imaging data for hamine analogs. For high-content imaging, H4 and U87 cells were incubated with the indicated harmine analogs in dose response (0.1 – 66 µM) for 72 h. Cells were stained with Hoechst and YOYO-1, and nuclear count, nuclear area and nuclear YOYO-1 staining, measured and imaged as described in method 2.4 below. Dose response data for harmine analogs on H4 (A) and U87 (B) glioma cells were plotted, and IC50 values were determined using Prism GraphPad 7.0. Representative high-content images (10x; overlay of Hoechst=blue, YOYO-1=green) for vehicle (DMSO) and harmine analogs (at 16.7, 33.3. and 66.7 μM) on H4 (C) and U87 (D) glioma cells. (E) Representative high-content images for harmine and harmol (33.3 and 66.7 µM) on H4 (upper panel) and U87 (lower panel) glioma cells. Images for 16.7 μM are included in the accompanying article [1].

Hits from Prestwick Chemical Library Screen of DYRK1A. Chemical identifier number provided by Prestwick Corporation. Hits defined as >50% inhibition in two independent replicate screens. Chemical structures of harmine and anlaogs identified from DYRK1A inhibition screen. Structures were downloaded using JChem database. Cell proliferation assay data for hamine analogs. Glioma cancer cells H4 (A) and U87 (B) were incubated with harmine analogs in dose response (0.0001 – 25 µM) with proliferation assessed using PrestoBlue. For each concentration, percent inhibition values were calculated, and data were normalized to DMSO vehicle. Dose response curves were plotted, and IC50 values were determined using Prism GraphPad 7.0. High-content cell imaging data for hamine analogs. For high-content imaging, H4 and U87 cells were incubated with the indicated harmine analogs in dose response (0.1 – 66 µM) for 72 h. Cells were stained with Hoechst and YOYO-1, and nuclear count, nuclear area and nuclear YOYO-1 staining, measured and imaged as described in method 2.4 below. Dose response data for harmine analogs on H4 (A) and U87 (B) glioma cells were plotted, and IC50 values were determined using Prism GraphPad 7.0. Representative high-content images (10x; overlay of Hoechst=blue, YOYO-1=green) for vehicle (DMSO) and harmine analogs (at 16.7, 33.3. and 66.7 μM) on H4 (C) and U87 (D) glioma cells. (E) Representative high-content images for harmine and harmol (33.3 and 66.7 µM) on H4 (upper panel) and U87 (lower panel) glioma cells. Images for 16.7 μM are included in the accompanying article [1].

Experimental Design, Materials and Methods

Reagents and cells

Reagents for the DYRK1A screen (DYRK1A-GST, anti-GST antibody (Ab) and Kinase Tracer 236) were from Life Technologies (Carlsbad, CA). Glioma cell lines H4 and U87 were from ATCC. The Prestwick chemical library, which contains >95% FDA-approved drugs, was from Prestwick (Prestwick Chemical, Washington, DC). Tetrahydroharmine was purchased from Cayman Chemical (Ann Arbor, MI) and norharmane from Toronto Research Chemicals (North York, ON, Canada).

Hit list from high-throughput screen of DYRK1A with Prestwick drug library

The DYRK1A time-resolved fluorescence energy transfer (TR-FRET) assay was optimized and validated for HTS as described in detail in the accompanying MethodsX article [5]. Briefly, the assay is carried out as follows. DYRK1A-GST, anti-GST Ab and Kinase Tracer 236 were combined and dispensed into low volume black 384-well plates using a NanoScreen NSX-1536 equipped with a 384 head (Beckman Coulter; Brea, CA, USA). For compound addition, 50 nL of each drug from the Prestwick library (1124 compounds) was added using a Biomek NX workstation (Beckman-Coulter) equipped with a Pintool array (VP Scientific; San Diego CA) into a final assay volume of 7.5 µL to give a final compound concentration of 6.7 µM. Plates were covered, incubated for 1 h at RT and then read on a PHERAstar plate reader (BMG Labtech; Cary, NC, USA) using 665 /620 nm. Two independent screens were carried out.

Cell proliferation assay

Cell proliferation assay was carried out essentially as in [6]. Using a multidrop dispenser (Thermo), cells were plated in clear 384-well tissue culture plates at 1000 cells per well for U87 and 800 cells per well for H4. Cells were allowed to attach overnight at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Compounds were then added to cells in duplicate 20-point 2-fold concentration response (0.0001 µM to 25 µM) using a Biomek NX and incubated for 72 h. PrestoBlue in PBS was then added and after 90 min fluorescence was determined using a PHERAstar plate reader at λex 560 nm / λem 590 nm. Based on DMSO-treated controls, relative cell proliferation was calculated using raw RFU values. Data were plotted to generate dose response curves, and IC50 values were determined by non-linear regression using GraphPad Prism 7.

High-content imaging analysis

Dyes Hoechst 33342 for nuclear count and YOYO-1 to assess membrane integrity were added to glioma cancer cells (H4 and U87) for live imaging combined with quantitative multiparametric analysis of cell morphology [7]. Cells were grown and treated with compounds as in Method 2.3 (above). For cell imaging, fluorescence quantification was determined using a Thermo Fisher CellInsight NXT and HCS Screen software (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and images were captured as described in [6]. Excitation wavelengths were 386 nm and 485 nm for Hoechst 33342 and YOYO-1, respectively. A nuclear mask was established (Hoechst 33342) to determine nuclear characteristics: nuclear count (a measure of cell count) and nuclear size (a measure of nuclear morphology); as well as establishing area inside nuclear mask for YOYO-1 staining (a measure of plasma membrane integrity) [7]. For quantitation, data were plotted and analyzed in Prism GraphPad 7.0.

Ethics Statement

The authors declare that the work described is original and has not been submitted elsewhere for publication. No conflict of interest exists in this submission.

CRediT Author Statement

Michael Tarpley: Conceptualization, Methodology, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Validation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing; Helen Oladapo: Conceptualization, Methodology, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Validation; Thomas Brent Caligan: Methodology, Investigation, Validation; Rob U. Onyenwoke: Data curation, Validation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing; Kevin P. Williams: Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Conceptualization, Methodology, Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Writing original draft, Writing - Review & Editing.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships which have or could be perceived to have influenced the work reported in this article.
SubjectCell Biology
Specific subject areaHigh-throughput screening and high-content image analysis
Type of dataTableFigure
How data were acquiredPHERAstar plate reader (BMG Labtech; Cary, NC, USA) and CellInsight NXT (Thermo Fisher Scientific)
Data formatRawAnalyzed
Parameters for data collectionCompounds were screened at room temperature at 6.7 μM against DYRK1A. Cancer cells were treated with harmine analogs over a range of concentrations at 37 °C for 3 days.
Description of data collectionCompounds from the Prestwick library were screened against DYRK1A using a TR-FRET assay format, and percent inhibition values were determined. Cancer cells were treated with harmine analogs and then assessed for effects on proliferation by Presto Blue assay for effects on cell growth and cytotoxicity by high-content imaging.
Data source locationInstitution: North Carolina Central UniversityCity/Town/Region: Durham, North CarolinaCountry: U.S.A.Latitude and longitude (and GPS coordinates, if possible) for collected samples/data: 35.97630, -78.90378
Data accessibilityWilliams, Kevin (2021), “Raw data in article submitted to Data in Brief (Tarpley et al., 2021)”, Mendeley Data, V1, https://doi.org/10.17632/3r9r4s5yvm.1https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/3r9r4s5yvm/1
Related research articleTarpley, M. Oladapo, H.O. Strepay, D. Caligan,T.B. Chdid, L. Shehata, H. Roques, J.R. Thomas, R. Laudeman, C.P. Onyenwoke, R.U. Darr, D.B. Williams, K.P. Identification of harmine and β-carboline analogs from a high-throughput screen of an approved drug collection; profiling as differential inhibitors of DYRK1A and monoamine oxidase A and for in vitro and in vivo anti-cancer studies, Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 162 (2021) 105,821.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2021.105821
  6 in total

Review 1.  DYRK1A kinase inhibitors with emphasis on cancer.

Authors:  A Ionescu; F Dufrasne; M Gelbcke; I Jabin; R Kiss; D Lamoral-Theys
Journal:  Mini Rev Med Chem       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.862

Review 2.  The role of DYRK1A in neurodegenerative diseases.

Authors:  Jerzy Wegiel; Cheng-Xin Gong; Yu-Wen Hwang
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 5.542

3.  Application of a high-content multiparameter cytotoxicity assay to prioritize compounds based on toxicity potential in humans.

Authors:  Vivek C Abraham; Danli L Towne; Jeffrey F Waring; Usha Warrior; David J Burns
Journal:  J Biomol Screen       Date:  2008-06-19

4.  Dyrk1a haploinsufficiency induces diabetes in mice through decreased pancreatic beta cell mass.

Authors:  Latif Rachdi; Dulanjalee Kariyawasam; Fanny Guez; Virginie Aïello; Maria L Arbonés; Nathalie Janel; Jean-Maurice Delabar; Michel Polak; Raphaël Scharfmann
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 10.122

5.  Pharmacological targeting of GLI1 inhibits proliferation, tumor emboli formation and in vivo tumor growth of inflammatory breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Helen O Oladapo; Michael Tarpley; Scott J Sauer; Kezia A Addo; Shalonda M Ingram; Dillon Strepay; Ben K Ehe; Lhoucine Chdid; Michael Trinkler; Jose R Roques; David B Darr; Jodie M Fleming; Gayathri R Devi; Kevin P Williams
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 8.679

6.  Identification of harmine and β-carboline analogs from a high-throughput screen of an approved drug collection; profiling as differential inhibitors of DYRK1A and monoamine oxidase A and for in vitro and in vivo anti-cancer studies.

Authors:  Michael Tarpley; Helen O Oladapo; Dillon Strepay; Thomas B Caligan; Lhoucine Chdid; Hassan Shehata; Jose R Roques; Rhashad Thomas; Christopher P Laudeman; Rob U Onyenwoke; David B Darr; Kevin P Williams
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Sci       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 5.112

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Identification of harmine and β-carboline analogs from a high-throughput screen of an approved drug collection; profiling as differential inhibitors of DYRK1A and monoamine oxidase A and for in vitro and in vivo anti-cancer studies.

Authors:  Michael Tarpley; Helen O Oladapo; Dillon Strepay; Thomas B Caligan; Lhoucine Chdid; Hassan Shehata; Jose R Roques; Rhashad Thomas; Christopher P Laudeman; Rob U Onyenwoke; David B Darr; Kevin P Williams
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Sci       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 5.112

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.