Core Tip: Atherosclerosis represents the main cause of acute myocardial infarction (MI), but less frequent causes should be evaluated in young individuals not at risk of such cardiac events. Aggressive chemotherapy for testicular seminoma increases vascular toxicity that may induce acute MI, complicating the clinical course of the subject. Under conservative treatment with antiplatelets and anticoagulants, the clinical evolution of subjects is favorable, but with the extant risk of repeating cardiac events on further chemotherapy courses.
INTRODUCTION
Testicular cancer is a prototypic type of tumor in young men, being at the same time the most frequent solid tumor in the age range of 15 to 40[1]. Despite the negative clinical features and psychological impact[2], the curability rate of testicular cancer with modern therapy is high, with a low mortality at 5- and 10-years[1]. Side effects among testicular cancer survivors are significant, and result from underlying neoplasia and treatment[3].By all histological subtypes of testicular tumors, seminomas are most frequently encountered in patients with a history of cryptorchidism. In subjects presenting stage I or II seminoma, chemotherapy with cisplatin-based cures assures roughly a 90% rate of curability[4]. Although efficient, the combination of bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin (BEP) is associated with many side effects that include nephrotoxicity, neuropathy, infertility, vascular toxicity or secondary leukemia[5].Vascular toxicity can take various forms including the Raynaud phenomenon, myocardial infarction (MI) or cerebrovascular events. Even if a study showed no supplementary risk of acute vascular events in patients receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy for testicular cancer[6], we present the case of a 34-year-old man who developed inferior MI during the first course of chemotherapy for testicular seminoma. The patient gave informed consent for the presentation of the clinical case.
CASE PRESENTATION
Chief complaints
A 34-year-old man was admitted to the cardiology department for intense chest pain, malaise and diaphoresis. This is the first chest pain episode, the patient describing it as constrictive and not responding to anti-inflammatory medication taken at home.
History of present illness
The chest pain developed 2 h previously, approximately 12 h after he ended his first course of chemotherapy for right testicular seminoma.
History of past illness
Seven years prior, the patient suffered from orchidopexy for bilateral cryptorchidism and had been diagnosed with right testicular seminoma two months prior to the incident under review; surgical resection was performed shortly after the diagnosis and was followed by chemotherapy. The latter was a combination of three anticancer drugs (BEP): Bleomycin 30 mg on days 1-5, 8 and 15, and etoposide 100 mg/mp and cisplatin 20 mg/mp in the first five days. The chemotherapy course would have been repeated on day 21.On day 5, shortly after the first chemotherapy session, the patient developed severe acute chest pain, 10 out of 10 on the visual analogue scale.
Personal and family history
He had neither cardiovascular risk factors, nor a family history of cardiovascular events.
Physical examination
The clinical examination on admission pinpointed, blood pressure of 120/80 mmHg, a heart rate of 85 beats/min, with cardiac and pulmonary examination showing no significant pathological findings.
Laboratory examinations
The electrocardiogram revealed sinus rhythm, ST-segment elevation in the inferior leads (Figure 1) and elevated markers of necrosis (troponin I 8.37 ng/mL, CK-MB 18.23 ng/mL). Total white blood cell count and neutrophil count were within normal ranges.
Figure 1
Electrocardiogram with sinus rhythm and ST-segment elevation in DII, DIII and aVF leads.
Electrocardiogram with sinus rhythm and ST-segment elevation in DII, DIII and aVF leads.Total, low-density and high-density lipoproteins cholesterol, as well as glycated haemoglobin were within the normal cut-off values.
Imaging examinations
The subject’s echocardiography showed hypokinesia in the basal segments of the inferior and infero-lateral walls of the left ventricle, with a global ejection fraction 55%. Furthermore, no significant valvular abnormalities were detected.
FINAL DIAGNOSIS
The patient was given loading dosages of aspirin and clopidogrel and was directly taken to the catheter laboratory for an angiography, with the final diagnosis of acute inferior ST-elevation MI.The left main, anterior interventricular and circumflex artery were normal, while the right coronary artery showed a mild stenotic lesion (30%-40%) with slightly suprajacent thrombus and vasospasm (Figure 2).
Figure 2
Right coronary artery showing mild stenotic lesion with thrombus at crux cordis (arrow).
Right coronary artery showing mild stenotic lesion with thrombus at crux cordis (arrow).
TREATMENT
Medical treatment and follow-up were decided in the catheter laboratory. The patient was admitted to the coronary care unit for 3 d, where he was treated with aspirin, clopidogrel, a calcium blocker (namely verapamil), atorvastatin, isosorbide dinitrate, un-fractioned heparin and perindopril. He remained asymptomatic and was discharged with the same treatment except anticoagulants, in order to continue the chemotherapy according to the initial protocol.
OUTCOME AND FOLLOW-UP
The patient proceeded with chemotherapy without other acute cardiovascular events. At six months later he was asymptomatic from a cardiovascular point of view, with no evidence of active disease found during an abdominopelvic computer tomography. He remained under long-term surveillance for both distant and nodal relapse.
DISCUSSION
In a patient without cardiovascular risk factors, the emergence of an acute MI shortly after the first course of BEP makes chemotherapy a very likely cause of the acute ischemic event, although the exact pathophysiological mechanisms are difficult to prove conclusively. The patient was in sinus rhythm, and echocardiography ruled out intra-cardiac sources of thrombo-embolism such as intra-cardiac thrombus or tumor, mitral stenosis or other risk factors for embolism, excluding a thromboembolism-related MI. Furthermore, emboli frequently stop at the level of stenosis, bifurcation or tortuosity, this not being the case of the thrombus identified in our patient that, with a high probability, was formed in situ; moreover, an atherosclerotic cause of this acute MI is less likely, as the other coronary segments showed no signs of atherosclerosis. Although rare and unpredictable, Takotsubo syndrome is associated with several chemotherapy regimens (mainly with 5-fluorouracil), reason for which we had considered this diagnosis. However, the patient did not meet the Mayo clinic criteria[7], since he did not have dyskinesia of left mid-ventricular segment with or without apical involvement as the Mayo clinic criteria requires for such a diagnosis (Video 1, Video 2, and Video 3). Furthermore, the chemotherapy undertaken by our patient is not associated with Takotsubo syndrome, but given the unpredictability of the disease this possibility should be considered even if not reported previously. Consequently, we speculate the patient suffered an endothelial lesion with in situ thrombus formation promoted by the anticancer drugs with suprajacent coronary vasospam, but in the absence of optical coherence tomography or intravascular echocardiography the exact mechanism cannot be established. For the evaluation of coronary vasospasm, the right coronary artery was injected with 200 μg nitroglycerine with the slight improvement of the acute myocardial infarction culprit lesion, but without its total disappearance. The most likely explanation for the reduced response to nitroglycerine is that the lesion encountered on angiography is the result of a complex mechanism that also includes endothelial erosion apart from coronary vasoconstriction. The erosion of the endothelial taken as one main mechanism of cisplatin vascular toxicity is supported by both experimental and clinical data regarding endothelial damage, apoptosis as well as platelet adherence, activation and aggregation[8,9]. Moreover, an increasing body of evidence points to the fact that cisplatin also induces endothelial dysfunction, affecting both the relaxation and contractile function through severe damage to blood vessel walls[10]. The mechanisms underlying the latter are mainly the reduction of endothelial nitric oxide synthetase and an increase in plasminogen activator inhibitor 1[11], but also include other mechanisms such as hydrogen sulphide availability[12]. Thrombus formation is the result of one or more of the following factors that build Virchow’s triad: endothelial dysfunction, hypercoagulation and blood stagnation. All anticancer drugs our patient took can induce either one or more of the factors within Virchow’s triad. Bleomycin increases interleukin-1 secretion at the pulmonary level, and further on the latter acts on the vascular endothelial promoting procoagulant activity and leukocyte adhesion[13]. Other studies have shown that cisplatin induces coronary spasms[14] and even direct damage to vascular endothelium[8]. Moreover, etoposide is associated with the increased risk of MI[15] especially if used in conjunction with other cardiotoxic agents. Another mechanism of thrombosis which could have explained the broader angiographic picture is a prolonged vasospasm with coronary occlusion and secondary thrombus formation[16].
CONCLUSION
For the case presented above we hypothesize that the particular chemotherapy regimen employed induced not only an endothelial dysfunction with vasospasm, but also a direct endothelial lesion that promoted thrombus formation in a subject predisposed to thrombosis given the neoplasia and anticancer treatment. Procoagulant activity increases mainly when multiple drugs work synergistically in combination, as in the case of our patient[6]. Furthermore, many factors contribute to the systemic overall cardiotoxicity, some related to the drugs themselves but also to the individual. Moreover, given that young individuals without any cardiovascular risk factors are predisposed to ischemic cardiovascular events, preventive measures during chemotherapy should actively be implemented; for example, one such measure could be the addition of anticoagulants or aspirin[17] to the adjuvant therapy, along with the reduction in dosages, the increase of time-intervals between treatment administration and the avoidance of certain combinations of anti-cancer drugs.
Authors: Nalinie Joharatnam-Hogan; Fay Cafferty; Richard Hubner; Daniel Swinson; Sharmila Sothi; Kamalnayan Gupta; Stephen Falk; Kinnari Patel; Nicola Warner; Victoria Kunene; Sam Rowley; Komel Khabra; Tim Underwood; Janusz Jankowski; John Bridgewater; Anne Crossley; Verity Henson; Lindy Berkman; Duncan Gilbert; Howard Kynaston; Alistair Ring; David Cameron; Farhat Din; Janet Graham; Timothy Iveson; Richard Adams; Anne Thomas; Richard Wilson; C S Pramesh; Ruth Langley Journal: Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2019-08-30
Authors: Esperanza Herradón; Cristina González; José A Uranga; Raquel Abalo; Ma I Martín; Visitacion López-Miranda Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2017-05-08 Impact factor: 5.810