Literature DB >> 34141538

Arthroscopic Triple Reconstruction in the Hip Joint: Restoration of Soft-Tissue Stabilizers in Revision Surgery for Gross Instability.

Hari K Ankem1, Samantha C Diulus1, Mitchell B Meghpara1,2, Philip J Rosinsky1, Jacob Shapira1, David R Maldonado1, Ajay C Lall1,2,3, Benjamin G Domb1,2,3.   

Abstract

Gross hip instability in an active adult with previous normal hip anatomy is usually due to disruption of the static stabilizers of the hip joint. Although such a disruption can result from a high-grade injury, it can be iatrogenic after previous hip arthroscopy. The patient may present with a painful limp and recurrent subluxation sensation in the affected hip joint. Revision hip arthroscopy in this scenario is generally complicated, and it is not uncommon for all the soft-tissue stabilizers to be compromised. The labrum, ligamentum teres (LT), and capsule of the hip joint are often so damaged that reparation is not an option. Reconstruction of the torn LT is an established method to add secondary stability while addressing the labral pathology in the hip joint with microinstability. Concomitant reconstruction of all the static restraints has yet to be described addressing triple instability. This Technical Note presents a stepwise approach, including tips and pearls, for arthroscopic triple reconstruction of the labrum, LT, and capsule. We believe this method is a safe and reproducible way to effectively treat gross hip instability in young patients.
© 2021 by the Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34141538      PMCID: PMC8185569          DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2021.01.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthrosc Tech        ISSN: 2212-6287


Gross hip instability in an active adult with previous normal hip anatomy is usually due to disruption of the primary and secondary stabilizers of the hip joint.1, 2, 3 Although such a disruption can result from a high-grade injury, it can be iatrogenic after previous hip arthroscopy.4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 The patient usually presents with a painful limp and recurrent subluxation of the affected hip that may result in frequent falls. Furthermore, the patient may give a history of spontaneous dislocation of the hip during sleep, requiring emergency reduction. Repetitive injury from either the patient’s recreational activities or prior arthroscopic exploration of the hip joint is sometimes forthcoming in the narrative.4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 Alternatively, the patient might sustain a secondary traumatic incident that could then trigger the train of events that followed primary hip arthroscopy. Recent advances in arthroscopic hip preservation have led us to better understand the roles of various static stabilizers in maintaining the hip’s suction seal.12, 13, 14 A diagnostic workup with advanced imaging studies delineates the extent of soft-tissue injury and helps plan definitive surgical management. Soft-tissue deficiencies such as segmental labral defects, torn nonfunctional labra,, complete ligamentum teres (LT) tears,17, 18, 19 and capsular defects after previous arthroscopic interventions20, 21, 22, 23 are often noticed, in addition to secondary avulsion injuries. Generalized ligamentous laxity further increases the instability risk in these individuals.,, Revision hip arthroscopy in this scenario is generally complicated, and it is not uncommon for all the soft-tissue stabilizers to be compromised.4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 The labrum, LT, and capsule of the hip joint are often so damaged that reparation is not an option. Reconstruction of the torn LT has recently gained traction to add secondary stability while addressing the capsulolabral defects in the grossly unstable hip joint.17, 18, 19 Concomitant reconstruction of all the static restraints in the setting of complex instability (i.e., triple reconstruction) has yet to be described. This Technical Note presents a stepwise approach, including tips and pearls, for arthroscopic triple reconstruction of the labrum, LT, and capsule. We believe this method is a safe and reproducible way to effectively treat gross hip instability in young patients.

Indications, Patient Evaluation, and Imaging

The patient history could include prior hip arthroscopy after which a trivial trauma causes instability symptoms with repetitive subluxations and sometimes even an anterior hip dislocation. There could be significant hip pain limiting the patient’s activities of daily living that will be unresponsive to conservative management. Clinical examination findings are positive for hip impingement and anterior apprehension, suggesting hip instability. Radiographically, there may be a large cam morphology with a loose bony fragment representing capsular avulsion (Fig 1 A-C). Magnetic resonance arthrogram of the affected hip will show a labral tear with a capsular defect anterosuperiorly and a tear of the LT (Fig 1 D-G).
Fig 1

Preoperative plain radiographs of right hip: anteroposterior view (A), Dunn lateral view (B), and false-profile view (C) showing cam morphology (dashed arrows) with capsular avulsion loose fragment at superior aspect (solid arrows). (D-G) Magnetic resonance arthrogram of right hip: axial short tau inversion recovery (STIR) bilateral (BILAT), axial oblique (OBL) proton density (PD), axial oblique (OBL) T2, and sagittal (SAG) proton density (PD)–fat saturation (FS) images depicting anterior capsular defect (Caps Def) in right hip (black arrows) and intact anterior capsule (Caps) in left hip (arrows). (Ac, acetabulum; ANT, anterior; POST, posterior; RFH, right femoral head; RT, right; SUP, superior.)

Preoperative plain radiographs of right hip: anteroposterior view (A), Dunn lateral view (B), and false-profile view (C) showing cam morphology (dashed arrows) with capsular avulsion loose fragment at superior aspect (solid arrows). (D-G) Magnetic resonance arthrogram of right hip: axial short tau inversion recovery (STIR) bilateral (BILAT), axial oblique (OBL) proton density (PD), axial oblique (OBL) T2, and sagittal (SAG) proton density (PD)–fat saturation (FS) images depicting anterior capsular defect (Caps Def) in right hip (black arrows) and intact anterior capsule (Caps) in left hip (arrows). (Ac, acetabulum; ANT, anterior; POST, posterior; RFH, right femoral head; RT, right; SUP, superior.)

Surgical Technique

Patient Preparation and Positioning

After induction of general anesthesia, the patient is placed in the modified supine position on the traction extension table with a well-padded peroneal post, the genitalia protected, and the feet well secured. The operative hip and the contralateral iliac crest are prepared and draped in usual sterile fashion. Traction is applied to the hip under fluoroscopy.

Fluoroscopic Technique

The C-arm is positioned on the nonoperative side and draped in sterile fashion. A true anteroposterior radiograph of the pelvis is obtained by tilting the C-arm to compensate for the Trendelenburg inclination. A spinal needle is then introduced into the joint under fluoroscopy, and the joint is vented, achieving further distention.

Portal Placement

The anterolateral portal is created with a No. 11 blade. The spinal needle is reinserted to ensure avoidance of the labrum and femoral head. An over-the-guidewire technique is used to place a 70° arthroscope through a 4.5-mm cannula. This same technique is repeated to place a 5-mm cannula through the midanterior portal. A Beaver blade (BVI Medical, Waltham, MA) is used to perform an interportal capsulotomy, incising the intact part of the capsule parallel to the acetabular rim to connect the 2 portals. In addition, a distal anterolateral accessory portal is made to provide a better angle for capsular elevation and capsular closure.

Diagnostic Arthroscopy

Diagnostic arthroscopy of the hip, when performed, may show the presence of a labral tear (Seldes type I or II) (Fig 2A) that might not be reparable. Varying grades of acetabular labrum articular disruption (ALAD) and/or Outerbridge acetabular cartilage lesions of significant dimensions (grade 2 or above) can be identified in the 1- to 3-o’clock zone. Additionally, there may be a femoral head cartilage lesion of varying dimensions (Outerbridge grade 2 or above) in the 9- to 11-o’clock zone consistent with anterior instability (Fig 2 B and C). An anterior capsular defect may be present that will enable us to see the iliopsoas tendon easily in the foreground, along with a full-thickness tear of the LT that may coexist (Fig 2). Occasionally, a loose body may be identified, which could have resulted from an acetabular rim fracture. In the peripheral compartment, there may be a residual cam morphology that can be visualized.
Fig 2

Revision arthroscopic images of right hip. (A, B) Dry view showing labral tear with large capsular-labral separation and segmental defect (arrow) in 12- to 3-o’clock zone (A) and 8- to 12-o’clock zone (B). (C) Large capsular-labral separation (double-line arrow) and segmental defect (single-line arrow) (1- to 4-o’clock zone). (D) Arthroscopic view of right hip showing completely torn ligamentum teres with remnants (arrows). (E) Deficient anterosuperior joint capsule (black arrows). The iliopsoas tendon (Ip, white arrow) is easily seen in the foreground at the bottom of the image. Orientations are marked for reference. (Ac, acetabulum; Ant, anterior; Caps Def, capsular defect; FH, femoral head; Inf, inferior; L, labrum; Lab Def, labral defect; LT Rem, ligamentum teres remnants; P, probe; Post, posterior; Sup, superior; TAL, transverse acetabular ligament.)

Revision arthroscopic images of right hip. (A, B) Dry view showing labral tear with large capsular-labral separation and segmental defect (arrow) in 12- to 3-o’clock zone (A) and 8- to 12-o’clock zone (B). (C) Large capsular-labral separation (double-line arrow) and segmental defect (single-line arrow) (1- to 4-o’clock zone). (D) Arthroscopic view of right hip showing completely torn ligamentum teres with remnants (arrows). (E) Deficient anterosuperior joint capsule (black arrows). The iliopsoas tendon (Ip, white arrow) is easily seen in the foreground at the bottom of the image. Orientations are marked for reference. (Ac, acetabulum; Ant, anterior; Caps Def, capsular defect; FH, femoral head; Inf, inferior; L, labrum; Lab Def, labral defect; LT Rem, ligamentum teres remnants; P, probe; Post, posterior; Sup, superior; TAL, transverse acetabular ligament.)

Loose Body Removal

The loose body, if identified, is removed using an arthroscopic grasper. Remnant suture material from the suture anchors of the previous labral repair, if found, is also removed.

Arthroscopic Rim Trimming and Femoroplasty

After the capsule is elevated using an ablator radiofrequency wand, acetabular rim trimming is performed with a 5.5-mm burr under fluoroscopic guidance to create a bleeding edge of bone and encourage healing. Next, the arthroscope and a curved shaver are moved into the peripheral compartment as the traction is released, and the hip is flexed to 45°. Femoroplasty is then performed using a 5.5-mm burr with extensive fluoroscopic visualization.

Arthroscopic Labral Reconstruction With Allograft

Traction is reapplied. The irreparable labrum is removed, and the rim is prepared. An allograft (tibialis posterior tendon) is taken to the back table and prepared in a single-stranded fashion. The anterior end of the graft is anchored first at the 5-o’clock zone, near the anterior end of the transverse acetabular ligament. The graft is then secured with anchors placed sequentially from anterior to posterior, using a total of 6 anchors (1.8-mm knotless FiberTak; Arthrex, Naples, FL). The excess graft is cut off with the Beaver blade and pulled out through the posterolateral portal. Excellent restoration of the continuous labrum is achieved in this fashion (Fig 3, Video 1).,
Fig 3

Revision arthroscopic images of right hip. (A) Labral tear with large capsular-labral separation (probe [P] in place) and segmental defect (arrow) (Fig 2C repeated for orientation). (B) Excised labral remnants with residual suture strands held with grasper (double-line arrow) from prior labral repair. The single-line arrow indicates the labral defect. (C-E) Bird’s-eye view of circumferential labral reconstruction, from TAL (arrows) insertion points, at 5-o’clock position anteriorly to 7-o’clock position posteriorly. (F, G) Arthroscopic bird’s-eye view of circumferential labral reconstruction with traction (F) and without traction (G) in right hip, showing restoration of suction seal against spherical femoroplasty. The arrows indicate the capsular remnant. (Ac, acetabulum; Ant, anterior; Caps def, capsular defect; Caps Rem, capsular remnant; FH, femoral head; G, grasper; Inf, inferior; Lab Def, labral defect; Lab Recon, labral reconstruction; Post, posterior; Sup, superior; TAL, transverse acetabular ligament.)

Revision arthroscopic images of right hip. (A) Labral tear with large capsular-labral separation (probe [P] in place) and segmental defect (arrow) (Fig 2C repeated for orientation). (B) Excised labral remnants with residual suture strands held with grasper (double-line arrow) from prior labral repair. The single-line arrow indicates the labral defect. (C-E) Bird’s-eye view of circumferential labral reconstruction, from TAL (arrows) insertion points, at 5-o’clock position anteriorly to 7-o’clock position posteriorly. (F, G) Arthroscopic bird’s-eye view of circumferential labral reconstruction with traction (F) and without traction (G) in right hip, showing restoration of suction seal against spherical femoroplasty. The arrows indicate the capsular remnant. (Ac, acetabulum; Ant, anterior; Caps def, capsular defect; Caps Rem, capsular remnant; FH, femoral head; G, grasper; Inf, inferior; Lab Def, labral defect; Lab Recon, labral reconstruction; Post, posterior; Sup, superior; TAL, transverse acetabular ligament.)

Arthroscopic LT Reconstruction With Allograft

The torn LT stump is debrided using an ablation device. A distal inferolateral incision is made, and a trans-trochanteric bone tunnel is drilled over a guidewire exiting through the foveal footprint of the LT under biplanar fluoroscopic guidance. The soft tissue is removed from the cotyloid fossa with the shaver and ablation device, and the LT footprint is decorticated with the burr to create a bleeding bed of bone for healing. A double-stranded tibialis posterior tendon allograft is prepared. The fixation on the acetabular side is kept ready by passing two 1.8-mm knotless FiberTak anchors in a posteroinferior direction at the inferior end of the cotyloid fossa in the footprint of the LT attachment. A passing suture is placed through the anterior portal and retrieved through the femoral tunnel. The graft is then introduced through the anterior portal. The graft is cinched and secured to the footprint on the cotyloid fossa. The femoral side of the graft is then pulled into the femoral tunnel with the passing suture and fixed with a PEEK (polyether ether ketone) interference screw while the tension on the graft is maintained with the hip in 60° of external rotation. The graft is well positioned in this manner and verified to have appropriate tension when examined through internal and external rotation (Fig 4, Video 1).
Fig 4

Revision arthroscopic images of acetabular floor in right hip. (A) Completely torn ligamentum teres with remnants (arrows) (Fig 2D repeated for orientation). (B, C) Ligamentum teres reconstruction with hip in neutral rotation (B) and hip in full external rotation (C), showing ligamentum teres fibers' differential tensioning. The arrows indicate the acetabular fossa. (Ac, acetabulum; FH, femoral head; Inf, inferior; LT Rem, ligamentum teres remnants; LT Recon, ligamentum teres reconstruction; Post, posterior; TAL, transverse acetabular ligament.)

Revision arthroscopic images of acetabular floor in right hip. (A) Completely torn ligamentum teres with remnants (arrows) (Fig 2D repeated for orientation). (B, C) Ligamentum teres reconstruction with hip in neutral rotation (B) and hip in full external rotation (C), showing ligamentum teres fibers' differential tensioning. The arrows indicate the acetabular fossa. (Ac, acetabulum; FH, femoral head; Inf, inferior; LT Rem, ligamentum teres remnants; LT Recon, ligamentum teres reconstruction; Post, posterior; TAL, transverse acetabular ligament.)

Arthroscopic Capsular Reconstruction

The incompetent remnants of the capsule, including the involved parts of the iliofemoral ligament, are excised. The capsular defect is then measured using a measuring probe. A dermal allograft patch (Arthroflex; Arthrex) is sutured to the free edges of the native capsule using No. 2 SutureTape (Arthrex) to complete the capsular reconstruction. Excellent fill of the capsular defect is achieved in this fashion (Fig 5, Video 1).
Fig 5

Revision arthroscopic images of right hip. (A) Complete anterosuperior capsular defect area in center and top of image (Fig 2E repeated for orientation). (B-D) Initial steps of capsular reconstruction using dermal allograft (with femoral head at bottom of images). (E) Final step of capsular reconstruction. (F) Triple reconstruction of soft-tissue stabilizers of hip (labral reconstruction, ligamentum teres reconstruction [LT Recon], and capsular reconstruction) (artistic rendering). (Ac, acetabulum; Ant, anterior; Caps def, capsular defect; Caps Rem, capsular remnant; Caps Recon, capsular reconstruction; FH, femoral head; Ip, iliopsoas; L, labrum; Lab Recon, labral reconstruction; P, probe; Post, posterior; Sup Med, superomedial.)

Revision arthroscopic images of right hip. (A) Complete anterosuperior capsular defect area in center and top of image (Fig 2E repeated for orientation). (B-D) Initial steps of capsular reconstruction using dermal allograft (with femoral head at bottom of images). (E) Final step of capsular reconstruction. (F) Triple reconstruction of soft-tissue stabilizers of hip (labral reconstruction, ligamentum teres reconstruction [LT Recon], and capsular reconstruction) (artistic rendering). (Ac, acetabulum; Ant, anterior; Caps def, capsular defect; Caps Rem, capsular remnant; Caps Recon, capsular reconstruction; FH, femoral head; Ip, iliopsoas; L, labrum; Lab Recon, labral reconstruction; P, probe; Post, posterior; Sup Med, superomedial.)

Closure

The joint is lavaged and sucked dry of fluid. All instruments are withdrawn from the joint. The portals are closed using No. 3-0 nylon sutures. Steri-Strips (3M, St. Paul, MN) and sterile dressings are applied, and the hip is placed in a hip brace locked in 0° to 90° of flexion. The patient is safely awakened and extubated and is taken to the recovery room in stable condition.

Postoperative Rehabilitation

The patient is advised to remain partially weight bearing (20 lb) on the operated extremity using crutches for 6 weeks while continuing to wear the hip brace for postoperative stability for 6 weeks. Physical therapy begins the day after surgery, following all 4 phases as per our previously published protocol.,

Discussion

This Technical Note describes our preferred method of treatment for triple hip instability if a patient presents with a defective hip joint capsule, labrum, and LT that require reconstruction (Video 1). Gross instability in a non-dysplastic hip is either post-traumatic or, more often, iatrogenic from prior arthroscopy4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 with disruption of the soft-tissue stabilizers.1, 2, 3 While commenting on iatrogenic instability, Byrd identified 6 contributing factors. The patient may have all of these factors, placing him or her at increased risk of complex hip instability. First, there may be a loose fragment resulting from the capsular avulsion, putting the hip at risk of becoming under-covered. Second, the labrum may be diminutive, from either repeated injury or aggressive labral debridement during previous hip arthroscopy. Third, the LT could be completely torn. Fourth, there may be a capsular defect that might have resulted from either failed repair or excessive resection during prior arthroscopy in addition to violation from avulsion, resulting in a capsular breach. Fifth, the patient could have been preconditioned to be at risk owing to previous hip arthroscopy. Finally, a new traumatic injury could occur in the patient and could trigger the aforementioned cascade of events. We strongly believe that to effectively manage this type of patient, it is important to recognize complex instability in the setting of revision hip arthroscopy. A painful limp and a feeling of recurrent subluxation in the affected hip joint are the usual mode of presentation owing to disruption of all the static stabilizers. The primary stabilizers of the hip joint are the capsuloligamentous structures, whereas the labrum and the LT act as secondary stabilizers.1, 2, 3 The hip joint labrum has proprioceptive and nociceptive functions and aids in load distribution. The aim of the different hip labral restoration techniques—repair, augmentation, or reconstruction34, 35, 36—is to help maintain intra-articular fluid pressurization.12, 13, 14 Torn labra with viable tissue quality and good volume can be repaired to restore the transition zone and suction seal., However, it is not too uncommon for most of the soft-tissue stabilizers to be grossly damaged and irreparable in the revision setting. Reconstruction may be indicated for a degenerative labrum with a calcified or ossified labral segment or a labrum that is irreparably torn with nonviable tissue., Likewise, a hypotrophic labrum, a previously debrided labrum that is reduced in effective depth and volume, or a segmental defect that disrupts the labral seal may be addressed with labral reconstruction.,,39, 40, 41 Segmental labral reconstruction is an option when there is a missing section of labral tissue or a segment with no viable fibers.,, Circumferential labral reconstruction is a technically reproducible and reliable method that not only maintains continuous hoop stress circumferentially but also replaces potentially pain-generating damaged native labral tissue.,, However, it has a steep learning curve and is technically demanding. In addition to the labrum, the capsuloligamentous structures are primary stabilizers that deter any dislocating force on the hip joint.1, 2, 3 After breakage of the suction seal, the capsule may be the most important structure resisting distraction.,,, Various capsular management strategies concerning repair of the iliofemoral ligament and avoidance of zona orbicularis injury were described earlier in the literature and remain valid options in the primary hip arthroscopy setting.20, 21, 22, 23 However, reports of iatrogenic hip dislocation or recurrent subluxation after hip arthroscopy may relate to underlying damage to the hip joint capsule from aggressive resection or inefficient capsular management strategies.4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 The resulting capsular defect thus precludes definitive repair. Capsular reconstruction is a valid option in this setting, and different graft choices are available, each with its advantages and disadvantages.,43, 44, 45, 46 Finally, the role of the LT in adding to hip joint stability has been well recognized., Several studies have reported the efficacy of LT debridement, making it an accepted standard of care in earlier published reports.,, However, LT reconstruction has gained popularity recently.,,, Reconstruction of the torn LT has become an established method to add secondary stability while addressing labral defects in hip microinstability.,, Hip joint capsular defects, a completely torn LT, and an irreparable labrum together may present as a grossly unstable hip. We believe that our method is a safe and effective method that is reproducible when performed using the proper, stepwise technique for arthroscopic triple reconstruction of the labrum, LT, and capsule described in this article. There are some contraindications for this technique, as well as a few disadvantages, pitfalls, risks, and limitations, as addressed in Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, Table 4.
Table 1

Indications and Contraindications for Arthroscopic Triple Reconstruction of Soft-Tissue Stabilizers in Hip Joint

Indications
 Iatrogenic and complex triple hip instability with all 3 major static stabilizers compromised
Contraindications
 Lack of experience with each reconstruction procedure
 Inadequate acetabular bony coverage
 Arthritis or significant chondral damage
Table 2

Advantages and Disadvantages of Arthroscopic Triple Reconstruction of Soft-Tissue Stabilizers in Hip Joint

Advantages
 Addresses complex triple hip instability by restoring all static stabilizers
 Follows principles of restoration of anatomy
 Single-stage procedure
Disadvantages
 Technically demanding procedure with steep learning curve
 Potential for major complications with individual and combined procedures
 - Labral reconstruction: sciatic neurapraxia from traction (early) and/or iatrogenic dysplasia from over-resection
 - LT reconstruction: pelvic floor neurovascular injury (early) and/or stress injury to femoral neck
 - Capsular reconstruction: abdominal compartment syndrome (early) and/or postoperative instability

LT, ligamentum teres.

Table 3

Pearls and Pitfalls for Arthroscopic Triple Reconstruction of Soft-Tissue Stabilizers in Hip Joint

Pearls
 Femoroplasty before reconstruction
 Multiple allografts simultaneously kept readily available in operating room
 LT reconstruction first, followed by labral reconstruction and, finally, capsular reconstruction
 Intermittent release of traction during and between the 3 reconstruction procedures
Pitfalls
 Risk of prolonged surgery and anesthesia time
 Complex nature of procedure with 3 major reconstructions
 Multiple allografts needed
 Steep learning curve

LT, ligamentum teres.

Table 4

Risk and Limitations of Arthroscopic Triple Reconstruction of Soft-Tissue Stabilizers in Hip Joint

Risks
 Risk of sciatic nerve injury if traction time is prolonged
 Abdominal compartment syndrome if intra-abdominal fluid extravasation occurs
Limitations
 Cost and availability of various graft sources
 Inability to compensate for deficient acetabular bony coverage
Indications and Contraindications for Arthroscopic Triple Reconstruction of Soft-Tissue Stabilizers in Hip Joint Advantages and Disadvantages of Arthroscopic Triple Reconstruction of Soft-Tissue Stabilizers in Hip Joint LT, ligamentum teres. Pearls and Pitfalls for Arthroscopic Triple Reconstruction of Soft-Tissue Stabilizers in Hip Joint LT, ligamentum teres. Risk and Limitations of Arthroscopic Triple Reconstruction of Soft-Tissue Stabilizers in Hip Joint In conclusion, complex instability of the hip from combined damage to primary (capsuloligamentous structures) and secondary (labrum and LT) stabilizers can present as hip pain with recurrent subluxation. The cause of this type of presentation can be post-traumatic or, more often, iatrogenic after previous hip arthroscopy. Concomitant reconstruction of the damaged labrum, LT, and capsule is the definitive treatment for this type of triple instability. This approach not only ensures joint stability by restoring the anatomy but also prevents further damage to the articular cartilage.
  49 in total

Review 1.  Capsular management during hip arthroscopy: from femoroacetabular impingement to instability.

Authors:  Asheesh Bedi; Gregory Galano; Christopher Walsh; Bryan T Kelly
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Arthroscopic debridement of the isolated Ligamentum Teres rupture.

Authors:  Barak Haviv; John O'Donnell
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  A quantitative assessment of the insertional footprints of the hip joint capsular ligaments and their spanning fibers for reconstruction.

Authors:  Jessica J M Telleria; Derek P Lindsey; Nicholas J Giori; Marc R Safran
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2013-11-30       Impact factor: 2.414

4.  Hip Capsular Reconstruction Using Dermal Allograft.

Authors:  Jorge Chahla; Chase S Dean; Eduardo Soares; William R Mook; Marc J Philippon
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2016-05-11

5.  Perineal Pressure During Hip Arthroscopy Is Reduced by Use of Trendelenburg: A Prospective Study With Randomized Order of Positioning.

Authors:  Ajay C Lall; Ardavan A Saadat; Muriel R Battaglia; David R Maldonado; Itay Perets; Benjamin G Domb
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  Hip Dislocation or Subluxation After Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Neil L Duplantier; Patrick C McCulloch; Shane J Nho; Richard C Mather; Brian D Lewis; Joshua D Harris
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  Achieving Successful Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopy in the Setting of Generalized Ligamentous Laxity With Labral Preservation and Appropriate Capsular Management: A Propensity Matched Controlled Study.

Authors:  David R Maldonado; Jeffery W Chen; Mitchell J Yelton; Philip J Rosinsky; Jacob Shapira; Ciaran Brayboy; Ajay C Lall; Benjamin G Domb
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 8.  Microinstability of the hip-it does exist: etiology, diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Michael M Kalisvaart; Marc R Safran
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2015-04-20

Review 9.  Structured physical therapy protocols following hip arthroscopy and their effect on patient-reported outcomes-a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Hari K Ankem; Mitchell J Yelton; Ajay C Lall; Alex M Bendersky; Philip J Rosinsky; David R Maldonado; Jacob Shapira; Mitchell B Meghpara; Benjamin G Domb
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2020-12-18

10.  Anterior Capsule Reconstruction of the Native Hip: A Technique Guide.

Authors:  Adrian Z Kurz; Muzammil Memon; Dale Williams; Olufemi R Ayeni
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2019-09-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.