Literature DB >> 34141304

The views of service users on the accessibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of psychodynamic psychotherapy.

Verity Statham1, Nigel Beail1,2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess how accessible, acceptable, and effective psychodynamic psychotherapy (PP) is perceived to be by service users.
METHOD: Interviews were conducted with 10 participants, who had finished, or were attending, PP. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis.
RESULTS: Most participants understood how they had accessed PP. However, a minority were unsure. Some found traveling to sessions anxiety-provoking and appreciated a friendly greeting upon arrival. Participants highlighted feeling listened to. However, many participants were unhappy about therapy ending and struggled to share what they had learned. Some were surprised by the content of sessions. Finally, most participants highlighted problems that had improved because of therapy. IMPLICATIONS: Clinicians should ensure that service users understand the nature of PP before starting sessions and identify clear goals. Support traveling to sessions may improve attendance, Finally, the importance of planning the ending of therapy was highlighted. ORIGINALITY VALUE: The paper captures the views of those with ID on the accessibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of PP. © The British Society of Developmental Disabilities 2018.

Entities:  

Keywords:  accessibility; effectiveness; intellectual disability; psychodynamic psychotherapy; psychotherapy

Year:  2018        PMID: 34141304      PMCID: PMC8130728          DOI: 10.1080/20473869.2018.1458439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Dev Disabil        ISSN: 2047-3869


  8 in total

1.  Relation of the therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  D J Martin; J P Garske; M K Davis
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2000-06

2.  'Valuing people'--a new strategy for learning disability for the 21st century: how may it impinge on primary care?

Authors:  G Martin
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Effectiveness of systematic treatment selection for psychodynamic and cognitive-behavioural therapy: randomised controlled trial in routine mental healthcare.

Authors:  Birgit Watzke; Heinz Rüddel; Ralph Jürgensen; Uwe Koch; Levente Kriston; Barbara Grothgar; Holger Schulz
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 9.319

4.  How important are the common factors in psychotherapy? An update.

Authors:  Bruce E Wampold
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 49.548

Review 5.  Improving psychotherapy services: applications of research, audit and evaluation.

Authors:  G Parry
Journal:  Br J Clin Psychol       Date:  1992-02

Review 6.  Using qualitative methods in research with people who have intellectual disabilities.

Authors:  Nigel Beail; Katie Williams
Journal:  J Appl Res Intellect Disabil       Date:  2014-02-04

7.  Quality assessment in health.

Authors:  R J Maxwell
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-05-12

8.  An interview study of people with learning disabilities' experience of, and satisfaction with, group analytic therapy.

Authors:  James MacDonald; Valerie Sinason; Sheila Hollins
Journal:  Psychol Psychother       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.915

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.