Literature DB >> 34140573

Fensomea setacea, gen. & sp. nov. (Cladopyxidaceae, Dinophyceae), is neither gonyaulacoid nor peridinioid as inferred from morphological and molecular data.

Marc Gottschling1, Maria Consuelo Carbonell-Moore2, Kenneth Neil Mertens3, Monika Kirsch4, Malte Elbrächter5, Urban Tillmann6.   

Abstract

Dinophyte evolution is essentially inferred from the pattern of thecal plates, and two different labelling systems are used for the important subgroups Gonyaulacales and Peridiniales. The partiform hypotheca of cladopyxidoid dinophytes fits into the morphological concepts of neither group, although they are assigned to the Gonyaulacales. Here, we describe the thecate dinophyte Fensomea setacea, gen. & sp. nov., which has a cladopyxidoid tabulation. The cells displayed a Kofoidean plate formula APC, 3', 4a, 7″, 7C, 6S, 6''', 2'''', and slender processes were randomly distributed over the echinate or baculate surface. In addition, we obtained rRNA sequences of F. setacea, gen. & sp. nov., but dinophytes that exhibit a partiform hypotheca did not show a close relationship to Gonyaulacales. Character evolution of thecate dinophytes may have progressed from the ancestral state of six postcingular plates, and two more or less symmetrically arranged antapical plates, towards patterns of only five postcingular plates (Peridiniales) or more asymmetrical configurations (Gonyaulacales). Based on our phylogenetic reconsiderations the contact between the posterior sulcal plate and the first postcingular plate, as well as the contact between an antapical plate and the distalmost postcingular plate, do not represent a rare, specialized gonyaulacoid plate configuration (i.e., the partiform hypotheca of cladopyxidoid dinophytes). Instead, these contacts correspond to the common and regular configuration of peridinioid (and other) dinophytes.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34140573     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-92107-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  16 in total

1.  Variations in dinoflagellate cyst morphology under conditions of changing salinity during the last 2000 years in the Limfjord, Denmark.

Authors: 
Journal:  Rev Palaeobot Palynol       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 1.940

Review 2.  The evolution of modern eukaryotic phytoplankton.

Authors:  Paul G Falkowski; Miriam E Katz; Andrew H Knoll; Antonietta Quigg; John A Raven; Oscar Schofield; F J R Taylor
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-07-16       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Ultrastructure and large subunit rDNA-based phylogeny of Sphaerodinium cracoviense, an unusual freshwater dinoflagellate with a novel type of eyespot.

Authors:  Sandra C Craveiro; Øjvind Moestrup; Niels Daugbjerg; António J Calado
Journal:  J Eukaryot Microbiol       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 3.346

4.  Dinoflagellates: a remarkable evolutionary experiment.

Authors:  Jeremiah D Hackett; Donald M Anderson; Deana L Erdner; Debashish Bhattacharya
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.844

5.  Fine-structural characterization and phylogeny of Sphaerodinium (Suessiales, Dinophyceae), with the description of an unusual type of freshwater dinoflagellate cyst.

Authors:  Mariana S Pandeirada; Sandra C Craveiro; Niels Daugbjerg; Øjvind Moestrup; António J Calado
Journal:  Eur J Protistol       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.020

6.  Robust Dinoflagellata phylogeny inferred from public transcriptome databases.

Authors:  Dana C Price; Debashish Bhattacharya
Journal:  J Phycol       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 2.923

7.  Making sense of ocean biota: how evolution and biodiversity of land organisms differ from that of the plankton.

Authors:  Victor Smetacek
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.826

8.  Amphidoma languida sp. nov. (Dinophyceae) reveals a close relationship between Amphidoma and Azadinium.

Authors:  Urban Tillmann; Rafael Salas; Marc Gottschling; Bernd Krock; Daniel O'Driscoll; Malte Elbrächter
Journal:  Protist       Date:  2011-11-30

9.  Waking the dead: morphological and molecular characterization of extant †Posoniella tricarinelloides (Thoracosphaeraceae, Dinophyceae).

Authors:  Haifeng Gu; Monika Kirsch; Carmen Zinssmeister; Sylvia Soehner; K J Sebastian Meier; Tingting Liu; Marc Gottschling
Journal:  Protist       Date:  2013-07-11

Review 10.  On dinoflagellate evolution.

Authors:  F J Taylor
Journal:  Biosystems       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 1.973

View more
  1 in total

1.  Using RDNA sequences to define dinoflagellate species.

Authors:  Brittany M Ott; R Wayne Litaker; William C Holland; Charles F Delwiche
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.