Mariela Acuña Mora1, Carina Sparud-Lundin2, Philip Moons3, Ewa-Lena Bratt4. 1. Institute of Health and Care Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Sweden; Academy of Caring Science, Work Life and Social Welfare, University of Borås, Sweden. Electronic address: mariela.acuna.mora@gu.se. 2. Institute of Health and Care Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Sweden. Electronic address: carina.s-lundin@fhs.gu.se. 3. Institute of Health and Care Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Belgium; Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Cape Town, South Africa. Electronic address: philip.Moons@med.kuleuven.be. 4. Institute of Health and Care Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Pediatric Cardiology, The Queen Silvia Children's Hospital, Sweden. Electronic address: ewa-lena.bratt@gu.se.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This review aimed to: (i) inventory the definitions and measurements of patient empowerment in healthcare literature; (ii) appraise the conceptual and methodological rigor of included studies; and (iii) identify correlates of patient empowerment in persons with chronic conditions. METHODS: Four databases were searched to identify articles measuring patient empowerment in persons with chronic conditions, used a quantitative design and provided evidence on correlates of patient empowerment. Seventy-six articles were included and analyzed by descriptive statistics and summative content analysis. RESULTS: The articles used a range of definitions (n = 35) and instruments (n = 38), evaluating a range of correlates in four categories: sociodemographic characteristics, clinical outcomes, patient-reported outcomes and patient-reported experiences. The most frequent associations were between patient empowerment and age (n = 21), sex (n = 15), educational level (n = 15) and quality of life (n = 18). However, they were not always significant. CONCLUSION: The broad variation of definitions and instruments highlights the lack of consensus on how to interpret and measure patient empowerment. Although several covariates have been evaluated, there are few studies assess the same relationships. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Consensus on a definition and measurement of patient empowerment is needed to improve the quality of future research and to provide a more cohesive body of knowledge.
OBJECTIVE: This review aimed to: (i) inventory the definitions and measurements of patient empowerment in healthcare literature; (ii) appraise the conceptual and methodological rigor of included studies; and (iii) identify correlates of patient empowerment in persons with chronic conditions. METHODS: Four databases were searched to identify articles measuring patient empowerment in persons with chronic conditions, used a quantitative design and provided evidence on correlates of patient empowerment. Seventy-six articles were included and analyzed by descriptive statistics and summative content analysis. RESULTS: The articles used a range of definitions (n = 35) and instruments (n = 38), evaluating a range of correlates in four categories: sociodemographic characteristics, clinical outcomes, patient-reported outcomes and patient-reported experiences. The most frequent associations were between patient empowerment and age (n = 21), sex (n = 15), educational level (n = 15) and quality of life (n = 18). However, they were not always significant. CONCLUSION: The broad variation of definitions and instruments highlights the lack of consensus on how to interpret and measure patient empowerment. Although several covariates have been evaluated, there are few studies assess the same relationships. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Consensus on a definition and measurement of patient empowerment is needed to improve the quality of future research and to provide a more cohesive body of knowledge.
Authors: Mariela Acuña Mora; Koen Raymaekers; Liesbet Van Bulck; Eva Goossens; Koen Luyckx; Adrienne H Kovacs; Brith Andresen; Ju Ryoung Moon; Alexander Van De Bruaene; Jessica Rassart; Philip Moons Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2022-10-20 Impact factor: 3.077
Authors: Maya Kylén; Ulla-Karin Schön; Hélène Pessah-Rasmussen; Marie Elf Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-02-11 Impact factor: 3.390