Moniek A Donkers1, Vincent J H S Gilissen2, Math J J M Candel3, Nathalie M van Dijk2, Hans Kling4, Ruth Heijnen-Panis2, Elien Pragt2, Iwan van der Horst2, Sebastiaan A Pronk2, Walther N K A van Mook2,5,6. 1. Department of Intensive Care, Maastricht University Medical Center+, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands. m.donkers@student.maastrichtuniversity.nl. 2. Department of Intensive Care, Maastricht University Medical Center+, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Methodology and Statistics, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Spiritual Care Services, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands. 5. Academy for Postgraduate Medical Training, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands. 6. School of Health Professions Education, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has created ethical challenges for intensive care unit (ICU) professionals, potentially causing moral distress. This study explored the levels and causes of moral distress and the ethical climate in Dutch ICUs during COVID-19. METHODS: An extended version of the Measurement of Moral Distress for Healthcare Professionals (MMD-HP) and Ethical Decision Making Climate Questionnaire (EDMCQ) were online distributed among all 84 ICUs. Moral distress scores in nurses and intensivists were compared with the historical control group one year before COVID-19. RESULTS: Three hundred forty-five nurses (70.7%), 40 intensivists (8.2%), and 103 supporting staff (21.1%) completed the survey. Moral distress levels were higher for nurses than supporting staff. Moral distress levels in intensivists did not differ significantly from those of nurses and supporting staff. "Inadequate emotional support for patients and their families" was the highest-ranked cause of moral distress for all groups of professionals. Of all factors, all professions rated the ethical climate most positively regarding the culture of mutual respect, ethical awareness and support. "Culture of not avoiding end-of-life-decisions" and "Self-reflective and empowering leadership" received the lowest mean scores. Moral distress scores during COVID-19 were significantly lower for ICU nurses (p < 0.001) and intensivists (p < 0.05) compared to one year prior. CONCLUSION: Levels and causes of moral distress vary between ICU professionals and differ from the historical control group. Targeted interventions that address moral distress during a crisis are desirable to improve the mental health and retention of ICU professionals and the quality of patient care.
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has created ethical challenges for intensive care unit (ICU) professionals, potentially causing moral distress. This study explored the levels and causes of moral distress and the ethical climate in Dutch ICUs during COVID-19. METHODS: An extended version of the Measurement of Moral Distress for Healthcare Professionals (MMD-HP) and Ethical Decision Making Climate Questionnaire (EDMCQ) were online distributed among all 84 ICUs. Moral distress scores in nurses and intensivists were compared with the historical control group one year before COVID-19. RESULTS: Three hundred forty-five nurses (70.7%), 40 intensivists (8.2%), and 103 supporting staff (21.1%) completed the survey. Moral distress levels were higher for nurses than supporting staff. Moral distress levels in intensivists did not differ significantly from those of nurses and supporting staff. "Inadequate emotional support for patients and their families" was the highest-ranked cause of moral distress for all groups of professionals. Of all factors, all professions rated the ethical climate most positively regarding the culture of mutual respect, ethical awareness and support. "Culture of not avoiding end-of-life-decisions" and "Self-reflective and empowering leadership" received the lowest mean scores. Moral distress scores during COVID-19 were significantly lower for ICU nurses (p < 0.001) and intensivists (p < 0.05) compared to one year prior. CONCLUSION: Levels and causes of moral distress vary between ICU professionals and differ from the historical control group. Targeted interventions that address moral distress during a crisis are desirable to improve the mental health and retention of ICU professionals and the quality of patient care.
Entities:
Keywords:
COVID-19; Coronavirus; Doctors; Ethical climate; Intensive care medicine; Intensivists; Moral distress; Nurses
Authors: Katarzyna Czyż-Szypenbejl; Wioletta Mędrzycka-Dąbrowska; Anna Falcó-Pegueroles; Sandra Lange Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-02-08 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Priya-Lena Riedel; Alexander Kreh; Vanessa Kulcar; Angela Lieber; Barbara Juen Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Chloe A Wilson; Hannah Metwally; Smith Heavner; Ann Blair Kennedy; Thomas W Britt Journal: Int J Ment Health Nurs Date: 2021-10-13 Impact factor: 5.100
Authors: Giulia Lamiani; Davide Biscardi; Elaine C Meyer; Alberto Giannini; Elena Vegni Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-12-19 Impact factor: 3.390