| Literature DB >> 34139992 |
Tianbo Liu1,2, Yabing Gu3, Zhicheng Zhou2, Zhenghua Liu3, Huaqun Yin3, Chong Qin3, Tuyong Yi4, Jiemeng Tao5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To investigate the ecological effects of chemical and biological control methods on tobacco wildfire disease, a plot field experiment was conducted to compare the control efficiency and mechanisms of a chemical pesticide (kasugamycin wettable powder, KWP) and a biological control agent (BCA) through high-throughput sequencing of bacterial 16S rRNA genes.Entities:
Keywords: Biological control agent; Community assembly; Ecological process; Endophytic bacterial community
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34139992 PMCID: PMC8212473 DOI: 10.1186/s12866-021-02237-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Microbiol ISSN: 1471-2180 Impact factor: 3.605
Tobacco wildfire disease index under different treatments
| Treatment | 0 day | 7 day | 21 day |
|---|---|---|---|
| BCA | 3.37 ± 0.27a | 3.74 ± 0.42b | 4.59 ± 0.55c |
| KWP | 3.22 ± 0.24a | 3.79 ± 0.71b | 7.08 ± 1.15b |
| CK | 3.29 ± 0.53a | 4.24 ± 1.07a | 14.34 ± 0.59a |
Different letters indicate significant difference at 0.05 by multiple comparisons based on the means of least significant difference and a grouping of treatments
Fig. 1Average relative abundance of bacterial genera across different treatments, including control group (CK) and treatments of biological control agent (BCA) and chemical control agent (KWP). The number in front of “_” is the number of experimental days (0 day for CK group labeled as “Original”), while the number behind “_” is the serial number of the replicates
Fig. 2Alpha diversity of microbial communities based on OTU level across the control groups (CK), biological control agent (BCA) and chemical control agent (KWP) groups. Diversity indexes of Shannon-Weiner’s index (H) and Pielou evenness (J) are shown. Results are means and S.D. of eight replicates. Different letters above the column indicated the differences among samples are significant at the level of 0.05
Fig. 3Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) plots (A) and the boxplot of within-group distance based on NMDS plots (B)
Fig. 4Correlation between plant health and three key genera (Labrys, Nocardioides and Streptophyta). DI disease index. The blue lines and shading represent the regression lines with 95% confidence intervals. Pearson correlation indexes and p-values are shown in Supplementary materials: Table S1
Fig. 5Relative proportions of the ecological processes in community assembly