Literature DB >> 34139521

Association of first, second, and third-line bDMARDs and tsDMARD with drug survival among seropositive rheumatoid arthritis patients: Cohort study in A real world setting.

Seulggie Choi1, Byeongzu Ghang2, Seogsong Jeong1, Daein Choi3, Jeong Seok Lee4, Sang Min Park5, Eun Young Lee6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the association of first, second, and third-line biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and tofacitinib with drug survival among seropositive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.
METHODS: The study population was composed of 8,018 seropositive RA patients who were prescribed bDMARDs or tofacitinib between January 2014 and January 2019 from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database. First, second, and third-line choice of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) including etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, and golimumab, as well as non-TNFi including tocilizumab, rituximab, tofacitinib, and abatacept were assessed. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine the adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for drug failure according to bDMARD or tofacitinib choice starting from the initial prescription date.
RESULTS: Compared to first etanercept users, patients with first tocilizumab (aHR 0.56, 95% CI 0.46-0.68), tofacitinib (aHR 0.27, 95% CI 0.18-0.42), or abatacept (aHR 0.83, 95% CI 0.69-0.99) had lower risk of drug failure. Second choice of tocilizumab (aHR 0.38, 95% CI 0.25-0.55), tofacitinib (aHR 0.23, 95% CI 0.15-0.37), or abatacept (aHR 0.54, 95% CI 0.35-0.84) was associated with lower drug failure risk compared to second etanercept users. Finally, third choice of tocilizumab (aHR 0.32, 95% CI 0.16-0.62) or tofacitinib (aHR 0.35, 95% CI 0.19-0.63) was associated with lower drug failure risk compared to third TNFi users.
CONCLUSION: First and second-line tocilizumab, tofacitinib, or abatacept may lead to improved drug survival. Third-line use of tocilizumab or tofacitinib may be beneficiary in reducing drug failure risk among seropositive RA patients.
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs; Drug survival; Rheumatoid arthritis

Year:  2021        PMID: 34139521     DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2021.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Arthritis Rheum        ISSN: 0049-0172            Impact factor:   5.532


  3 in total

1.  Real-world effectiveness of biological therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Caroline Tianeze de Castro; Mariana Jorge de Queiroz; Flavia Caixeta Albuquerque; Celmário Castro Brandão; Leticia Farias Gerlack; Daniella Cristina Rodrigues Pereira; Sandra Castro Barros; Wenderson Walla Andrade; Ediane de Assis Bastos; Jessé de Nobrega Batista Azevedo; Roberto Carreiro; Mauricio Lima Barreto; Djanilson Barbosa Dos Santos
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 5.988

2.  Incident and recurrent herpes zoster for first-line bDMARD and tsDMARD users in seropositive rheumatoid arthritis patients: a nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Seogsong Jeong; Seulggie Choi; Sang Min Park; Jinseok Kim; Byeongzu Ghang; Eun Young Lee
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Patterns of biologic and targeted-synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug use in rheumatoid arthritis in Australia.

Authors:  Ashley Fletcher; Marissa Lassere; Lyn March; Catherine Hill; Claire Barrett; Graeme Carroll; Rachelle Buchbinder
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 7.046

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.