Literature DB >> 34139192

Neurally driven synthesis of learned, complex vocalizations.

Ezequiel M Arneodo1, Shukai Chen2, Daril E Brown3, Vikash Gilja3, Timothy Q Gentner4.   

Abstract

Brain machine interfaces (BMIs) hold promise to restore impaired motor function and serve as powerful tools to study learned motor skill. While limb-based motor prosthetic systems have leveraged nonhuman primates as an important animal model,1-4 speech prostheses lack a similar animal model and are more limited in terms of neural interface technology, brain coverage, and behavioral study design.5-7 Songbirds are an attractive model for learned complex vocal behavior. Birdsong shares a number of unique similarities with human speech,8-10 and its study has yielded general insight into multiple mechanisms and circuits behind learning, execution, and maintenance of vocal motor skill.11-18 In addition, the biomechanics of song production bear similarity to those of humans and some nonhuman primates.19-23 Here, we demonstrate a vocal synthesizer for birdsong, realized by mapping neural population activity recorded from electrode arrays implanted in the premotor nucleus HVC onto low-dimensional compressed representations of song, using simple computational methods that are implementable in real time. Using a generative biomechanical model of the vocal organ (syrinx) as the low-dimensional target for these mappings allows for the synthesis of vocalizations that match the bird's own song. These results provide proof of concept that high-dimensional, complex natural behaviors can be directly synthesized from ongoing neural activity. This may inspire similar approaches to prosthetics in other species by exploiting knowledge of the peripheral systems and the temporal structure of their output.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bioprosthetics; birdsong; brain machine interfaces; electrophysiology; neural networks; nonlinear dynamics; speech

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34139192      PMCID: PMC8375361          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.05.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.900


  63 in total

1.  Song replay during sleep and computational rules for sensorimotor vocal learning.

Authors:  A S Dave; D Margoliash
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-10-27       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT. The developmental dynamics of marmoset monkey vocal production.

Authors:  D Y Takahashi; A R Fenley; Y Teramoto; D Z Narayanan; J I Borjon; P Holmes; A A Ghazanfar
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks.

Authors:  G E Hinton; R R Salakhutdinov
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-07-28       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  A new mechanism of sound generation in songbirds.

Authors:  F Goller; O N Larsen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-12-23       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Automated recognition of bird song elements from continuous recordings using dynamic time warping and hidden Markov models: a comparative study.

Authors:  J A Kogan; D Margoliash
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Population-Level Representation of a Temporal Sequence Underlying Song Production in the Zebra Finch.

Authors:  Michel A Picardo; Josh Merel; Kalman A Katlowitz; Daniela Vallentin; Daniel E Okobi; Sam E Benezra; Rachel C Clary; Eftychios A Pnevmatikakis; Liam Paninski; Michael A Long
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Dopamine neurons encode performance error in singing birds.

Authors:  Vikram Gadagkar; Pavel A Puzerey; Ruidong Chen; Eliza Baird-Daniel; Alexander R Farhang; Jesse H Goldberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Identification of a motor-to-auditory pathway important for vocal learning.

Authors:  Todd F Roberts; Erin Hisey; Masashi Tanaka; Matthew G Kearney; Gaurav Chattree; Cindy F Yang; Nirao M Shah; Richard Mooney
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Acoustic fine structure may encode biologically relevant information for zebra finches.

Authors:  Nora H Prior; Edward Smith; Shelby Lawson; Gregory F Ball; Robert J Dooling
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Discrete motor coordinates for vowel production.

Authors:  María Florencia Assaneo; Marcos A Trevisan; Gabriel B Mindlin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Toward a Computational Neuroethology of Vocal Communication: From Bioacoustics to Neurophysiology, Emerging Tools and Future Directions.

Authors:  Tim Sainburg; Timothy Q Gentner
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 3.558

2.  Local field potentials in a pre-motor region predict learned vocal sequences.

Authors:  Daril E Brown; Jairo I Chavez; Derek H Nguyen; Adam Kadwory; Bradley Voytek; Ezequiel M Arneodo; Timothy Q Gentner; Vikash Gilja
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-09-23       Impact factor: 4.475

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.