Literature DB >> 34138738

Pristine quantum criticality in a Kondo semimetal.

Wesley T Fuhrman1, Andrey Sidorenko2, Jonathan Hänel2, Hannes Winkler2, Andrey Prokofiev2, Jose A Rodriguez-Rivera3,4, Yiming Qiu4, Peter Blaha5, Qimiao Si6, Collin L Broholm1,4,7, Silke Paschen8,6.   

Abstract

The observation of quantum criticality in diverse classes of strongly correlated electron systems has been instrumental in establishing ordering principles, discovering new phases, and identifying the relevant degrees of freedom and interactions. At focus so far have been insulators and metals. Semimetals, which are of great current interest as candidate phases with nontrivial topology, are much less explored in experiments. Here, we study the Kondo semimetal CeRu4Sn6 by magnetic susceptibility, specific heat, and inelastic neutron scattering experiments. The power-law divergence of the magnetic Grünesien ratio reveals that, unexpectedly, this compound is quantum critical without tuning. The dynamical energy over temperature scaling in the neutron response throughout the Brillouin zone and the temperature dependence of the static uniform susceptibility, indicate that temperature is the only energy scale in the criticality. Such behavior, which has been associated with Kondo destruction quantum criticality in metallic systems, could be generic in the semimetal setting.
Copyright © 2021 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC).

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34138738      PMCID: PMC8133744          DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abf9134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Adv        ISSN: 2375-2548            Impact factor:   14.136


INTRODUCTION

Quantum criticality is observed in many strongly correlated materials classes, with quantum spin systems (), high-Tc cuprate () and iron pnictide () superconductors, and heavy fermion metals (–) being prominent examples. Among them, the quantum critical insulators are the best understood. For instance, in the insulating quantum magnet LiHoF4 (), the experimentally detected quantum criticality is well described in terms of the Landau framework, i.e., by the critical fluctuations of the magnetic order parameter (, ). In quantum critical metals, by contrast, the underlying physics is much richer. In some systems, the Landau description works well (, ), but in others, it appears to fail (, , ). Theoretically, the charge carriers introduce additional nontrivial couplings to the order parameter or its underlying building blocks, which opens new possibilities for quantum criticality (–). Here, we explore the case of the Kondo semimetal CeRu4Sn6. Its noncentrosymmetric crystal structure (Fig. 1A), strong spin-orbit coupling associated with the three large atomic-number elements, and the fact that the anisotropy in its electronic dispersion () cannot be attributed to a nodal ground-state wave function of the Ce3+4f1 electron () have led to speculations () that the material may be topologically nontrivial. Density functional theory (DFT) calculation within the local density approximation (LDA) and the Gutzwiller scheme predict the material to host Weyl nodes (). If the nodal excitations persist in a full treatment of the Kondo effect, then CeRu4Sn6 will be a Weyl-Kondo semimetal (–). Our comprehensive investigation of the magnetization, Grüneisen parameter, and inelastic neutron scattering as functions of temperature and magnetic field reveals that this material is quantum critical without tuning, behavior that is only rarely observed (). This raises the exciting question of whether a Weyl-Kondo semimetal phase may indeed be located nearby, nucleating out of the quantum critical fluctuations.
Fig. 1

Characterization of CeRu4Sn6.

(A) Unit cell with view along tetragonal direction a = b (left), polyhedron around central Ce atom (center), and unit cell with view along c of the noncentrosymmetric tetragonal crystal structure of CeRu4Sn6, with a = 6.8810 Å and c = 9.7520 Å (, ). (B) Electrical resistivity (main panel) and charge carrier concentration determined from Hall effect measurements in a simple one-band model (inset) versus temperature, with current within the tetragonal plane, evidencing the semimetallic character of CeRu4Sn6. (C) Low-temperature specific heat over temperature ratio, plotted on semilogarithmic scales, evidencing a stronger than logarithmic divergence. (D) Magnetization over magnetic field, measured in different magnetic fields (B = μ0H) applied perpendicular to the tetragonal c axis, as function of temperature. The inset shows the inverse susceptibility, defined as 1/χ = H/M∣10 mT, plotted versus Tα, with α = 0.50 ± 0.01 as determined from a least-square fit with 1/χ = 1/χ0 + c · Tα to the data below 10 K. (E) Same as (D) for magnetic fields applied along c, with α = 0.78 ± 0.03. The fit was done below 3 K, where the noise in the data is small [c is the hard direction, along which χ is much smaller; note the different scales of (D) and (E)].

Characterization of CeRu4Sn6.

(A) Unit cell with view along tetragonal direction a = b (left), polyhedron around central Ce atom (center), and unit cell with view along c of the noncentrosymmetric tetragonal crystal structure of CeRu4Sn6, with a = 6.8810 Å and c = 9.7520 Å (, ). (B) Electrical resistivity (main panel) and charge carrier concentration determined from Hall effect measurements in a simple one-band model (inset) versus temperature, with current within the tetragonal plane, evidencing the semimetallic character of CeRu4Sn6. (C) Low-temperature specific heat over temperature ratio, plotted on semilogarithmic scales, evidencing a stronger than logarithmic divergence. (D) Magnetization over magnetic field, measured in different magnetic fields (B = μ0H) applied perpendicular to the tetragonal c axis, as function of temperature. The inset shows the inverse susceptibility, defined as 1/χ = H/M∣10 mT, plotted versus Tα, with α = 0.50 ± 0.01 as determined from a least-square fit with 1/χ = 1/χ0 + c · Tα to the data below 10 K. (E) Same as (D) for magnetic fields applied along c, with α = 0.78 ± 0.03. The fit was done below 3 K, where the noise in the data is small [c is the hard direction, along which χ is much smaller; note the different scales of (D) and (E)].

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The semimetallic character of CeRu4Sn6 (see the Supplementary Materials for information on crystal growth and characterization) is evidenced by the weak temperature dependence of the electrical resistivity below about 30 K and the small low-temperature charge carrier concentration (Fig. 1B). We have also measured the temperature dependence of the specific heat C (Fig. 1C) and the magnetization M, the latter with different magnetic fields H applied along the two main crystallographic directions (perpendicular and parallel to c; Fig. 1, D and E, respectively). The high-temperature anisotropy was recently shown to be due to single-ion crystal-field effects on the Ce3+4f1 electrons (). Deviations from this behavior below room temperature indicate a partial gapping of the electronic density of states and/or the onset of Kondo screening (). Below 10 K, a strong field dependence is observed. The temperature dependence of the magnetic susceptibility χ = M/H∣10 mT is not of simple Curie-Weiss type [χ = C/(T − Θ)] but, instead, is well described bywith α = 0.50 ± 0.01 and α = 0.78 ± 0.03 for magnetic fields applied perpendicular and parallel to c, respectively (Fig. 1, D and E, insets). This is inconsistent with quantum criticality involving a Lorentzian fluctuation spectrum, where α = 1 (Curie-Weiss law) is expected. The application of larger magnetic fields gradually restores Fermi liquid behavior, i.e., a temperature-independent low-temperature magnetization (Fig. 1, D and E, main panels). The magnetic Grüneisen ratio Γmag = −(∂M/∂T)/C is expected to diverge at any quantum critical point (), as observed in a number of quantum critical heavy fermion metals (, ). For CeRu4Sn6, from the low-field (10 mT) magnetization and specific heat data presented above, we find Γmag ∼ T−ϵ between about 0.4 K and 4 K, with ϵ = 1.43 ± 0.07 and 1.62 ± 0.11 for fields perpendicular and parallel to the c axis, respectively (Fig. 2, A and B), providing strong evidence for quantum criticality without tuning in CeRu4Sn6.
Fig. 2

Signatures of quantum criticality in thermodynamic properties of CeRu4Sn6.

(A) Magnetic Grüneisen ratio Γmag versus temperature at B = μ0H = 10 mT, applied perpendicular to the c axis, with a power law fit to the data (exponent 1.43 ± 0.07). (B) Same as (A) for magnetic fields applied along c, with exponent 1.62 ± 0.11. (C) Scaled negative temperature derivative of the magnetization over field ratio, −∂( · Hβ versus scaled temperature, T/Hγ, for fields perpendicular to c, with exponents β and γ that collapse the data. (D) Same as (C) for magnetic fields applied along c.

Signatures of quantum criticality in thermodynamic properties of CeRu4Sn6.

(A) Magnetic Grüneisen ratio Γmag versus temperature at B = μ0H = 10 mT, applied perpendicular to the c axis, with a power law fit to the data (exponent 1.43 ± 0.07). (B) Same as (A) for magnetic fields applied along c, with exponent 1.62 ± 0.11. (C) Scaled negative temperature derivative of the magnetization over field ratio, −∂( · Hβ versus scaled temperature, T/Hγ, for fields perpendicular to c, with exponents β and γ that collapse the data. (D) Same as (C) for magnetic fields applied along c. The field and temperature scaling of the magnetization data underpins this assignment. In Fig. 2 (C and D), we plot −∂( · Hβ versus T/Hγ over more than two orders of magnitude in T/Hγ, for fields between 10 mT and 0.5 T both perpendicular and parallel to c. We find a good data collapse with the exponents β being equal to α extracted from Fig. 1 (D and E) (insets) and γ = 0.35 ± 0.02 and 0.43 ± 0.02 for fields perpendicular and parallel to c, respectively. The fitted exponents are internally consistent, as they satisfy a scaling relationship (see the Supplementary Materials). This kind of critical scaling, with a fractional exponent α < 1 (), indicates that the system is at, or very close to, a beyond-Landau quantum critical point and that magnetic field acts as a tuning parameter, with criticality at H = 0. This is corroborated by our neutron scattering investigation presented next. The inelastic neutron scattering intensity is dominated by features broad in momentum space, with no apparent energy scale, setting the lower bound for a gap in the spin excitations to less than 0.1 meV. In Fig. 3 (A to C), we show the intensity distribution at 1.5 K, integrated from 0.2 meV to 1.2 meV, in the (H0L), (HK0), and (HHL) planes, respectively. The energy profile along two high-symmetry directions, (00L) and (H00), integrated over ±0.2 reciprocal lattice units (r.l.u.) perpendicular to these directions, is presented in Fig. 3 (D and E). The strong peaks at H + K + L = even are tails of nonmagnetic elastic Bragg scattering. There is no apparent change in the momentum dependence with energy transfer, meaning that the q and ω dependence of the scattering cross section factorizes and there is no dispersion. This is clearly at odds with any description of the criticality in terms of the fluctuations of an incipient symmetry-breaking order parameter, where the scattering intensity should be increasingly peaked at the critical wave vector. The broadness of the features is especially pronounced along (Fig. 3B) and, to a lesser extent, along the (H00) direction for peak intensities at H + 0 + L = odd (Fig. 3A) and symmetry-related directions where the scattering intensity simply follows the magnetic form factor of the Ce3+4f1 electrons. Scattering that is momentum independent along lines in the Brillouin zone is a sign of local (or Kondo destruction) quantum criticality () and has also been observed in quantum critical CeCu5.9Au0.1 (). The wave vector dependence of the scattering intensity away from these high-intensity lines is discussed below.
Fig. 3

Quasielastic neutron scattering from CeRu4Sn6.

(A to C) Energy-integrated neutron scattering intensity at 1.5 K in the (H0L), (HK0), and (HHL) planes, respectively. Saturated intensity at H + K + L = even is residual Bragg intensity. Along and equivalent directions in (B) and, to a lesser extent, along (H00) centered at H + 0 + L = odd in (A), the scattering intensity is almost q-independent. (D and E) Neutron scattering cross section versus energy and momentum transfer along (00L) and (H00), respectively. The q and ω dependence of the scattering cross section factorizes so that there is no dispersion and the signal continues below the resolution limit of the instrument. (F) “f-core” Fermi surface derived from LDA-DFT calculations.

Quasielastic neutron scattering from CeRu4Sn6.

(A to C) Energy-integrated neutron scattering intensity at 1.5 K in the (H0L), (HK0), and (HHL) planes, respectively. Saturated intensity at H + K + L = even is residual Bragg intensity. Along and equivalent directions in (B) and, to a lesser extent, along (H00) centered at H + 0 + L = odd in (A), the scattering intensity is almost q-independent. (D and E) Neutron scattering cross section versus energy and momentum transfer along (00L) and (H00), respectively. The q and ω dependence of the scattering cross section factorizes so that there is no dispersion and the signal continues below the resolution limit of the instrument. (F) “f-core” Fermi surface derived from LDA-DFT calculations. First, however, we investigate whether quantum critical scaling, as evidenced by the static uniform magnetic susceptibility χ = (∂M/∂H) = χ′(q = 0, ω = 0, T) (Fig. 1, D and E, insets), is also found in the dynamical spin susceptibility χ(q, ω, T). This would give rise to the formwhere f(q) is an offset and α = 1 is expected for a Lorentzian fluctuation spectrum as prescribed by the Landau order parameter description (, ), and a fractional exponent α < 1 points to its failure. The dynamic structure factor S(q, ω, T) measured by inelastic neutron scattering is related to the imaginary part χ′′ of χ(q, ω, T) by χ′′ = S · [1 − exp (− ℏω/kBT)], where the second factor manifests the fluctuation-dissipation relation. Near the peak wave vector, where the singular susceptibility corresponds to a vanishing f(q), it takes the formwhere g is a function that depends only on the ratio of ℏω and kBT. We have determined S(ω, T) by integrating the neutron scattering intensity for momentum transfers q about the (100) wave vector (where the quasielastic intensity is maximal; see Fig. 3, A and B), and plot it for temperatures between 0.1 K and 10 K, and energy transfers between 0.1 meV and 1.3 meV as S · Tα versus ℏω/kBT in Fig. 4A. The best data collapse is found for α = 0.6 ± 0.1 (inset of Fig. 4A). This is consistent with the α values determined from the static uniform magnetic susceptibility (α = 0.50 ± 0.01 for H ⊥ c and α = 0.78 ± 0.03 for H ∥ c), in particular, in view of the fact that the neutron scattering intensity is a directional average, taken around the (100) wave vector, where spin fluctuations polarized along and perpendicular to c contribute in equal measures. Thus, also the inelastic neutron scattering data evidence quantum criticality beyond the long-wavelength fluctuations of an order parameter (, ), such as expected in the theory of Kondo destruction quantum criticality ().
Fig. 4

Dynamical scaling of CeRu4Sn6.

(A) Scaled neutron scattering intensity, , from data collected at (100) and integrated over 0.2 r.l.u. along (H00) and (00L), versus scaled energy transfer, . The dashed line is the best fit of the function to the data, as obtained from Eq. 2 for f(q) = 0 [which holds well as seen from (B) and (C)]. The inset shows the reduced deviation between data and fit, , determined as the variance (squared sum of fit residuals divided by the degrees of freedom n − p, where n is the number of data points and p the number of fit parameters; the nonuniversal parameters a and c are left open), which is minimal for α = 0.6. (B and C) Offset f(q) from Eq. 2 in the (H0L) and (HK0) plane, respectively, obtained through a global fit of Eq. 2 to the q − E–dependent data in Fig. 3 with a single consistent value of α. The white areas correspond to blinded out data near the nuclear Bragg peaks, which are situated at H + K + L = even. Along in (C) and about (H01) in (B), f(q) is minimal, indicating maximally antiferromagnetic interactions (see the main text).

Dynamical scaling of CeRu4Sn6.

(A) Scaled neutron scattering intensity, , from data collected at (100) and integrated over 0.2 r.l.u. along (H00) and (00L), versus scaled energy transfer, . The dashed line is the best fit of the function to the data, as obtained from Eq. 2 for f(q) = 0 [which holds well as seen from (B) and (C)]. The inset shows the reduced deviation between data and fit, , determined as the variance (squared sum of fit residuals divided by the degrees of freedom n − p, where n is the number of data points and p the number of fit parameters; the nonuniversal parameters a and c are left open), which is minimal for α = 0.6. (B and C) Offset f(q) from Eq. 2 in the (H0L) and (HK0) plane, respectively, obtained through a global fit of Eq. 2 to the q − E–dependent data in Fig. 3 with a single consistent value of α. The white areas correspond to blinded out data near the nuclear Bragg peaks, which are situated at H + K + L = even. Along in (C) and about (H01) in (B), f(q) is minimal, indicating maximally antiferromagnetic interactions (see the main text). Last, we turn to the spatial profile of the critical fluctuations. To do so, we have fitted the experimental scattering intensity, corrected for the Ce form factor, in terms of Eq. 2. The resulting f(q) in the (H0L) and (HK0) planes are shown in Fig. 4 (B and C, respectively). For the rather featureless “ridge,” the singular dynamical spin susceptibility discussed earlier corresponds to a vanishingly small f(q) (see Fig. 4C). Likewise, in the (H0L) plane, it is seen that f(q) is vanishingly small for H + 0 + L = odd, where the dynamical spin susceptibility is also peaked. Along directions that move away from these ridges, the decreasing dynamical spin susceptibility corresponds to an increasing f(q). We can understand these features of f(q) in terms of the wave vector dependence of the Ruderman-Kittel-Kasuya-Yosida (RKKY) interaction Here, JK is the Kondo coupling strength and L(q, ω) the Lindhard function of the (uncorrelated) conduction electrons, which we have determined through LDA-DFT calculations, with one 4f electron per Ce3+ ion placed in the ionic core. This “f-core” band structure, resembling that of LaRu4Sn6, characterizes the electronic structure of the spd conduction electrons that mediate the RKKY interaction between the 4f moments. The associated Fermi surface is shown in Fig. 3F, from which we can identify nesting wave vectors that correspond to the and H + 0 + L = odd ridges. These can be seen as the broad planes perpendicular to the (00L) direction (Γ to M) and between X points extending along (00L). At these wave vectors, collectively denoted as Q, the RKKY interaction is maximally antiferromagnetic. The Weiss temperature scaledescribes the offset f(q), when the latter is raised to the power 1/α. In other words, the neutron scattering intensity is maximal where the Weiss temperature Θ(q) has a minimum, implying that the RKKY interaction defines the q space structure. Accordingly, the system may be near antiferromagnetic order mediated by the RKKY interaction, with an ordering wave vector at H + K + L = odd. Beyond-Landau quantum criticality, as indicated by a fractional exponent α < 1, has been documented in a handful of other heavy fermion compounds (, , –). Except for the case of the heavy fermion metal CeCu5.9Au0.1, a determination of α from inelastic neutron scattering—as provided here—has, however, remained elusive. Our discovery of beyond-Landau quantum criticality, in both the inelastic neutron response and the static uniform magnetic susceptibility, in a genuinely quantum critical semimetal implicates the generality of the phenomenon. Because this constitutes the first observation of this phenomenon in a semimetal, it will be important to explore whether beyond-Landau quantum criticality is inherent to systems with reduced charge carrier concentration. Promising materials to explore in this context are the low-carrier density Kondo systems CeRhBi (), CeNi2−δAs2 (), and Yb3Ir4Ge13 (), as well as the pyrochlore iridate Pr2Ir2O7 (, ), which all show thermodynamic signatures of quantum criticality. In heavy fermion systems, quantum criticality is generally observed at the T = 0 collapse of (antiferromagnetically) ordered phases. CeRu4Sn6, however, is quantum critical without tuning pressure, stoichiometry, or applied fields to a phase boundary. A natural question then arises: Is an antiferromagnetic phase nearby, as suggested by the minima of the Weiss temperature near possible antiferromagnetic ordering wave vectors, and can it be reached by tuning, for instance with pressure? And even more excitingly, do the quantum critical fluctuations give rise to emergent phases, maybe unconventional superconductivity in analogy to β-YbAlB4 () or, in view of all the necessary conditions being fulfilled, even a Weyl-Kondo semimetal phase akin to that recently discovered in Ce3Bi4Pd3 (–)? This will require further experiments at lower temperatures and as function of tuning parameters, which we hope this work will stimulate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For our study, single crystals of CeRu4Sn6 were grown from self-flux, using the floating zone melting technique with optical heating as reported previously () (see the Supplementary Materials for further details). The magnetic properties between 2 K and 300 K were measured in a SQUID magnetometer from Cryogenic Ltd., and the data between 0.3 K and 2 K used a 3He insert. High-temperature magnetization measurements up to 1000 K were performed with a vibrating sample magnetometer in a Physical Properties Measurement System (PPMS) from Quantum Design. The 3He PPMS option was used for specific heat measurements in the temperature range from 0.3 K to 20 K. Neutron scattering was performed with the Multi Axis Crystal Spectrometer (MACS) at the National Institute of Standards and Technology Center for Neutron Research. For the momentum-space mapping, we co-aligned 3 g of single crystals and used incident energies from 3.7 meV to 5 meV and a fixed final energy of 3.7 meV, allowing for the use of Be and BeO filters before and after the sample, respectively, and providing an effective resolution better than 0.05 Å−1 and 0.15 meV. For the ω/T scaling measurements, 2 g of single crystals were accommodated within the restrictions of a dilution refrigerator. We used a fixed final energy of 2.5 meV and incident energies up to 3.7 meV. A magnetic field of 10 mT was applied along (0K0) to avoid superconductivity in the aluminum sample mount and maintain good thermal contact.
  22 in total

1.  Universally diverging Grüneisen parameter and the magnetocaloric effect close to quantum critical points.

Authors:  Lijun Zhu; Markus Garst; Achim Rosch; Qimiao Si
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2003-08-05       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  Effect of a nonzero temperature on quantum critical points in itinerant fermion systems.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev B Condens Matter       Date:  1993-09-01

3.  Signatures of quantum criticality in pure Cr at high pressure.

Authors:  R Jaramillo; Yejun Feng; J Wang; T F Rosenbaum
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Divergence of the magnetic Grüneisen ratio at the field-induced quantum critical point in YbRh2Si2.

Authors:  Y Tokiwa; T Radu; C Geibel; F Steglich; P Gegenwart
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 9.161

5.  Kondo Insulator to Semimetal Transformation Tuned by Spin-Orbit Coupling.

Authors:  S Dzsaber; L Prochaska; A Sidorenko; G Eguchi; R Svagera; M Waas; A Prokofiev; Q Si; S Paschen
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 9.161

6.  YbRh2Si2: spin fluctuations in the vicinity of a quantum critical point at low magnetic field.

Authors:  K Ishida; K Okamoto; Y Kawasaki; Y Kitaoka; O Trovarelli; C Geibel; F Steglich
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2002-08-14       Impact factor: 9.161

7.  Quantum criticality in an Ising chain: experimental evidence for emergent E8 symmetry.

Authors:  R Coldea; D A Tennant; E M Wheeler; E Wawrzynska; D Prabhakaran; M Telling; K Habicht; P Smeibidl; K Kiefer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Iron pnictides as a new setting for quantum criticality.

Authors:  Jianhui Dai; Qimiao Si; Jian-Xin Zhu; Elihu Abrahams
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Divergence of the grüneisen ratio at quantum critical points in heavy fermion metals.

Authors:  R Küchler; N Oeschler; P Gegenwart; T Cichorek; K Neumaier; O Tegus; C Geibel; J A Mydosh; F Steglich; L Zhu; Q Si
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2003-08-05       Impact factor: 9.161

10.  Inhomogeneous Kondo-lattice in geometrically frustrated Pr2Ir2O7.

Authors:  Mariam Kavai; Joel Friedman; Kyle Sherman; Mingda Gong; Ioannis Giannakis; Samad Hajinazar; Haoyu Hu; Sarah E Grefe; Justin Leshen; Qiu Yang; Satoru Nakatsuji; Aleksey N Kolmogorov; Qimiao Si; Michael Lawler; Pegor Aynajian
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  1 in total

1.  Control of electronic topology in a strongly correlated electron system.

Authors:  Sami Dzsaber; Diego A Zocco; Alix McCollam; Franziska Weickert; Ross McDonald; Mathieu Taupin; Gaku Eguchi; Xinlin Yan; Andrey Prokofiev; Lucas M K Tang; Bryan Vlaar; Laurel E Winter; Marcelo Jaime; Qimiao Si; Silke Paschen
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 17.694

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.