Stephanie B Wheeler1,2, Lisa P Spees1,2, Bradford E Jackson2, Christopher D Baggett2,3, Lauren E Wilson4, Melissa A Greiner4, Deborah R Kaye5,6, Tian Zhang6,7, Daniel George6,7, Charles D Scales4,7, Jessica E Pritchard4, Michaela A Dinan4,8. 1. Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC-CH), Chapel Hill, NC. 2. Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, UNC-CH, Chapel Hill, NC. 3. Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, UNC-CH, Chapel Hill, NC. 4. Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC. 5. Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC. 6. Department of Surgery (Urology), Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC. 7. Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, NC. 8. Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Availability of targeted oral anticancer agents (OAAs) has transformed care for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Our objective was to identify patterns and predictors of OAA use within 12 months after mRCC was detected to understand real-world adoption of OAAs. METHODS: We used a novel, North Carolina cancer registry-linked multipayer claims data resource to examine patterns of use of five oral therapies among patients with mRCC diagnosed in 2006-2015, with claims through 2016. Patients were required to have 12 months of continuous enrollment before metastatic index date. Log-Poisson models estimated unadjusted and adjusted risk ratios (RRs) for associations between patient characteristics and OAA use. In sensitivity analyses, we used a competing risk framework to estimate adjusted risk differences in OAA use. RESULTS: Our population-based study of 713 patients demonstrated low (37%) OAA use during the first year after metastatic index date among both publicly and privately insured patients, with shifting patterns of use consistent with regulatory approvals over time. Compared with patients age 18-49 years, patients age 70-74 years were half likely to use OAAs (95% confidence limit [CL], 0.34 to 0.78) and patients age 80+ years were 71% less likely to use OAAs (95% CL, 0.17 to 0.50). Patients with two comorbidities (RR, 0.73; 95% CL, 0.55 to 0.98) and those with 3+ comorbidities (RR, 0.68; 95% CL, 0.50 to 0.91) were less likely to receive OAA than those without comorbidities. Patients with higher frailty also had lower OAA utilization (RR, 0.67; 95% CL, 0.52 to 0.85). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest a need to better understand the system-level and provider-level drivers of OAA underuse, as well as OAA adherence and associated survival.
PURPOSE: Availability of targeted oral anticancer agents (OAAs) has transformed care for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Our objective was to identify patterns and predictors of OAA use within 12 months after mRCC was detected to understand real-world adoption of OAAs. METHODS: We used a novel, North Carolina cancer registry-linked multipayer claims data resource to examine patterns of use of five oral therapies among patients with mRCC diagnosed in 2006-2015, with claims through 2016. Patients were required to have 12 months of continuous enrollment before metastatic index date. Log-Poisson models estimated unadjusted and adjusted risk ratios (RRs) for associations between patient characteristics and OAA use. In sensitivity analyses, we used a competing risk framework to estimate adjusted risk differences in OAA use. RESULTS: Our population-based study of 713 patients demonstrated low (37%) OAA use during the first year after metastatic index date among both publicly and privately insured patients, with shifting patterns of use consistent with regulatory approvals over time. Compared with patients age 18-49 years, patients age 70-74 years were half likely to use OAAs (95% confidence limit [CL], 0.34 to 0.78) and patients age 80+ years were 71% less likely to use OAAs (95% CL, 0.17 to 0.50). Patients with two comorbidities (RR, 0.73; 95% CL, 0.55 to 0.98) and those with 3+ comorbidities (RR, 0.68; 95% CL, 0.50 to 0.91) were less likely to receive OAA than those without comorbidities. Patients with higher frailty also had lower OAA utilization (RR, 0.67; 95% CL, 0.52 to 0.85). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest a need to better understand the system-level and provider-level drivers of OAA underuse, as well as OAA adherence and associated survival.
Authors: Alain Kaldany; Kyle A Blum; David J Paulucci; Alp Tuna Beksac; Isuru Jayaratna; John P Sfakianos; Ketan K Badani Journal: Urol Oncol Date: 2018-06-06 Impact factor: 3.498
Authors: Anne-Marie Meyer; Andrew F Olshan; Laura Green; Adrian Meyer; Stephanie B Wheeler; Ethan Basch; William R Carpenter Journal: N C Med J Date: 2014 Jul-Aug
Authors: Robert J Motzer; Thomas E Hutson; David Cella; James Reeves; Robert Hawkins; Jun Guo; Paul Nathan; Michael Staehler; Paul de Souza; Jaime R Merchan; Ekaterini Boleti; Kate Fife; Jie Jin; Robert Jones; Hirotsugu Uemura; Ugo De Giorgi; Ulrika Harmenberg; Jinwan Wang; Cora N Sternberg; Keith Deen; Lauren McCann; Michelle D Hackshaw; Rocco Crescenzo; Lini N Pandite; Toni K Choueiri Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-08-22 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Lesley-Ann Miller; Stephen Stemkowski; Kim Saverno; Daniel C Lane; Zhuliang Tao; Michelle D Hackshaw; Bryan Loy Journal: J Manag Care Spec Pharm Date: 2016-03
Authors: Sumanta Pal; Jun Gong; Shivani K Mhatre; Shih-Wen Lin; Andy Surinach; Sarika Ogale; Rini Vohra; Herschel Wallen; Daniel George Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2019-06-07 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Andre R Jordan; Jiaojiao Wang; Travis J Yates; Sarrah L Hasanali; Soum D Lokeshwar; Daley S Morera; Nagarajarao Shamaladevi; Charles S Li; Zachary Klaassen; Martha K Terris; Muthusamy Thangaraju; Amar B Singh; Mark S Soloway; Vinata B Lokeshwar Journal: Oncogenesis Date: 2020-05-19 Impact factor: 7.485
Authors: Samuel M Miller; Lauren E Wilson; Melissa A Greiner; Jessica E Pritchard; Tian Zhang; Deborah R Kaye; Harvey Jay Cohen; Robert D Becher; Linda L Maerz; Michaela A Dinan Journal: J Geriatr Oncol Date: 2022-01-05 Impact factor: 3.929
Authors: Lisa P Spees; Stephanie B Wheeler; Bradford E Jackson; Christopher D Baggett; Lauren E Wilson; Melissa A Greiner; Deborah R Kaye; Tian Zhang; Daniel George; Charles D Scales; Jessica E Pritchard; Michael Leapman; Cary P Gross; Michaela A Dinan Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2021-09-04 Impact factor: 4.452