Literature DB >> 34138448

Anatomo-functional outcomes of the laparoscopic Frykman-Goldberg procedure for rectal prolapse in a tertiary referral centre.

Gaetano Gallo1,2, Mario Trompetto3, Alberto Realis Luc3, Giuseppe Clerico3, Giuseppe Sammarco4, Eugenio Novelli5, Gilda De Paola6.   

Abstract

Rectal prolapse is a common disorder that represents a burden for patients due to the associated symptoms that may include both incontinence and constipation. Currently, a huge variation in techniques exist. The aim of this study was to evaluate the anatomo-functional results of the laparoscopic Frykman-Goldberg procedure (LFGP) for the treatment of both internal (IRP) and complete rectal prolapse (CRP). Between July 2004 and October 2019, 45 patients with IRP and CRP underwent a LFGP. The Cleveland Clinic Constipation Score (CCCS), Obstructed Defecation Syndrome Score (ODSS) and Vaizey Score (VS) were assessed preoperatively, 3 months before the procedure, 12 months after the procedures and at the final follow-up visit. The patients' mean age was 51.4 ± 17.9 (15-93) years, and the mean follow-up was 9.24 ± 4.57 (1.6-16.3) years. The VS, CCCS and ODSS significantly improved (p = 0.008; p < 0.001; p < 0.001) from median preoperative values of 3, 20 and 18 to 2, 6 and 5, respectively. Furthermore, the improvements in scores during follow-up remained constant and significant over time when considering the two groups separately (time effect for ODSS p < 0.001, for VS p = 0.026, for CCCS p < 0.001) and when the patients were divided by age (< 40, 41-60 and > 60; p < 0.001). The overall complication rate was 8.9% (4/45), and no intraoperative complications or anastomotic leakage occurred. Conversion to the open approach was not necessary in any case. The overall success rate was 97.7%, and only one recurrence in the IRP group occurred after 14 months. LRGP can be considered a safe, effective and long-lasting procedure in young patients with IRP or CRP, a history of ODS and a redundant sigmoid colon.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complete rectal prolapse; Functional results; Incontinence; Internal rectal prolapse; Laparoscopic resection rectopexy; Obstructed defecation syndrome; Rectal prolapse

Year:  2021        PMID: 34138448     DOI: 10.1007/s13304-021-01114-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Updates Surg        ISSN: 2038-131X


  40 in total

1.  A NEW CONCEPT OF MECHANISM AND TREATMENT OF RECTAL PROCIDENTIA.

Authors:  D S DEVADHAR
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1965 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  A theory of progression from obstructed defecation to fecal incontinence.

Authors:  F Pucciani
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Internal rectal intussusception seldom develops into total rectal prolapse.

Authors:  A Mellgren; I Schultz; C Johansson; A Dolk
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 4.  Consensus Statement of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR): management and treatment of complete rectal prolapse.

Authors:  G Gallo; J Martellucci; G Pellino; R Ghiselli; A Infantino; F Pucciani; M Trompetto
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-12-15       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Epidemiologic aspects of complete rectal prolapse.

Authors:  M V Kairaluoma; I H Kellokumpu
Journal:  Scand J Surg       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.360

6.  Rectal prolapse in women with other defects of pelvic floor support.

Authors:  W A Peters; M R Smith; C W Drescher
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Procidentia of the rectum studied with cineradiography. A contribution to the discussion of causative mechanism.

Authors:  B Brodén; B Snellman
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1968 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Physiological studies of the anal sphincter musculature in faecal incontinence and rectal prolapse.

Authors:  M E Neill; A G Parks; M Swash
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Obstructed defaecation syndrome: European consensus guidelines on the surgical management.

Authors:  A Picciariello; P R O'Connell; D Hahnloser; G Gallo; A Munoz-Duyos; O Schwandner; P Sileri; G Milito; S Riss; P A Boccasanta; G Naldini; A Arroyo; F de laPortilla; P Tsarkov; B Roche; C Isbert; M Trompetto; A d'Hoore; K Matzel; E Xynos; L Lundby; C Ratto; E Consten; A Infantino; Y Panis; G Terrosu; E Espin; J-L Faucheron; A Guttadauro; M Adamina; P A Lehur; D F Altomare
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2021-10-23       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 10.  Rectal prolapse.

Authors:  Stavros Gourgiotis; Sotirios Baratsis
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 2.796

View more
  1 in total

1.  Abdominal versus perineal approach for external rectal prolapse: systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gianluca Pellino; Giacomo Fuschillo; Costantinos Simillis; Lucio Selvaggi; Giuseppe Signoriello; Danilo Vinci; Christos Kontovounisios; Francesco Selvaggi; Guido Sciaudone
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2022-03-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.