| Literature DB >> 34138336 |
Jiawei Gao1, Xuesong Xie1, Shuquan Liang1,2, Bingan Lu3, Jiang Zhou4,5.
Abstract
Zinc-ion batteries (ZIBs) is a promising electrical energy storage candidate due to its eco-friendliness, low cost, and intrinsic safety, but on the cathode the element dissolution and the formation of irreversible products, and on the anode the growth of dendrite as well as irreversible products hinder its practical application. Herein, we propose a new type of the inorganic highly concentrated colloidal electrolytes (HCCE) for ZIBs promoting simultaneous robust protection of both cathode/anode leading to an effective suppression of element dissolution, dendrite, and irreversible products growth. The new HCCE has high Zn2+ ion transference number (0.64) endowed by the limitation of SO42-, the competitive ion conductivity (1.1 × 10-2 S cm-1) and Zn2+ ion diffusion enabled by the uniform pore distribution (3.6 nm) and the limited free water. The Zn/HCCE/α-MnO2 cells exhibit high durability under both high and low current densities, which is almost 100% capacity retention at 200 mA g-1 after 400 cycles (290 mAh g-1) and 89% capacity retention under 500 mA g-1 after 1000 cycles (212 mAh g-1). Considering material sustainability and batteries' high performances, the colloidal electrolyte may provide a feasible substitute beyond the liquid and all-solid-state electrolyte of ZIBs.Entities:
Keywords: Colloidal electrolyte; Cycle stability; Inorganic; Palygorskite; Zn-ion battery
Year: 2021 PMID: 34138336 PMCID: PMC8187543 DOI: 10.1007/s40820-021-00595-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomicro Lett ISSN: 2150-5551
Fig. 1a A simple process of colloidal electrolyte preparation and application. b XRD patterns of raw material (palygorskite) and colloidal electrolyte (after drying). c XPS full-spectrum image of raw material (palygorskite) and colloidal electrolyte (after drying). d FTIR spectra of raw material (palygorskite) and colloidal electrolyte (after drying)
Fig. 2a CV curves (the first cycle) at a scan rate of 0.1 mV s−1 with the HCCE and liquid electrolyte. b Charge–discharge curves under different cycles with the HCCE at 200 mA g−1. c Cycling performance of the cell with HCCE and liquid electrolyte cells at 200 mA g−1. d Cycling performance of the cell with HCCE and liquid electrolyte cells at 1000 mA g−1. e Capacity retention versus cycle number for electrolyte reported in aqueous Zn/mangan-based materials (mainly manganese dioxide) batteries, note: the current density and final specific capacity are indicated in the figure. f Long-life cycling performance of the cell with HCCE and liquid electrolyte at 500 mA g−1
Fig. 3a Element analysis of dissolved Mn2+ in Zn/MnO2 battery during cycling with 2 M ZnSO4 aqueous electrolyte and colloidal electrolyte (2 M ZnSO4 + palygorskite). SEM images of b cathode of the battery with HCCE and c the battery with liquid electrolyte after initial fully discharge to 1.0 V at 200 mA g−1. d ex-situ XRD patterns of the cell with HCCE and liquid electrolyte discharged/charged to different voltage states at 200 mA g−1. SEM images of e anode of the battery with HCCE and f the battery with liquid electrolyte cycled for 200 cycles 1000 mA g−1. AFM images of g anode of the battery with HCCE and h the battery with liquid electrolyte cycled for 200 cycles 1000 mA g−1
Fig. 4a Schematic diagram of interface protection effect in HCCE and liquid electrolyte. b Ion exchange diagrams in the HCCE. c FTIR spectra (1400–3800 cm−1) of colloidal electrolyte with different concentration and liquid electrolyte. d XRD patterns of HCCE (after drying) with different cycles: initial (no cycle), 1 cycle,3 cycles, 5 cycles, 10 cycles. e Raman spectra of colloidal electrolyte and liquid electrolyte. f XPS spectrum image of the cathode of the battery with HCCE and liquid electrolyte after initial discharge and 1000 cycles