| Literature DB >> 34138241 |
Minghao Wang1, Wei Wang1, Ben Ma1, Wei Shen1, Lihui Liu1, Kun Cao1, Shufen Chen2,3, Wei Huang4,5.
Abstract
The toxicity issue of lead hinders large-scale commercial production and photovoltaic field application of lead halide perovskites. Some novel non- or low-toxic perovskite materials have been explored for development of environmentally friendly lead-free perovskite solar cells (PSCs). This review studies the substitution of equivalent/heterovalent metals for Pb based on first-principles calculation, summarizes the theoretical basis of lead-free perovskites, and screens out some promising lead-free candidates with suitable bandgap, optical, and electrical properties. Then, it reports notable achievements for the experimental studies of lead-free perovskites to date, including the crystal structure and material bandgap for all of lead-free materials and photovoltaic performance and stability for corresponding devices. The review finally discusses challenges facing the successful development and commercialization of lead-free PSCs and predicts the prospect of lead-free PSCs in the future.Entities:
Keywords: First-principles calculation; Lead-free; Perovskite; Photovoltaic; Solar cells
Year: 2021 PMID: 34138241 PMCID: PMC8187519 DOI: 10.1007/s40820-020-00578-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomicro Lett ISSN: 2150-5551
Fig. 1Potential elements to substitute Pb. The orange shading on the periodic table marks the screened elements by Filip et al. that can replace Pb. The green shading of the VA group heterovalent elements and the blue shading of transition metal elements have also been calculated or proved to substitute Pb. (Color figure online)
Fig. 2Schematic illustration of the approaches and consequences of potential Pb replacement
Fig. 3SEM images for MASnI3 layer on mesoporous TiO2 layer by using a DMF, b NMP, c GBL, and d DMSO solvents. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [74]. SEM images for FASnI3 films obtained from different antisolvent processes: e No dripping, f CB, g TL and h DE. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [96]. SEM images of i vapor deposited 100 nm SnI2, non-annealing MASnI3 films with j 6, k 10, l 20 and m 40 mg mL−1 MAI precursor solution spin coated and n MASnI3 films with 20 mg mL−1 MAI precursor solution spin coated followed by annealing at 80 °C for 10 min. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [75]
Fig. 4a J–V curves of co-evaporated MASnBr3 films with different hole transport materials. b Sn 3d and c Br 3d XPS results of MASnBr3 films as-deposited and after 1 h stored in air. d Fabrication of sequential method for MASnBr3 films. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [77]. e J–V curves of CsSnI3-based PSCs incorporated with different ratios of SnF2. f J–V curves of 20 mol % SnF2-doped CsSnI3 devices showing no hysteresis. g IPCE spectrum for 20 mol % SnF2-doped CsSnI3 devices. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [71]
Fig. 5Energy diagram of common Sn-based perovskites, ETLs and HTLs. Unit: eV
Photovoltaic parameters of PSCs based on various Sn-based perovskite absorbers. In the table, c-TiO2 and m-TiO2 represent compact and mesoporous TiO2 layer, respectively
| Preparation process | Absorber | Device architecture | FF (%) | PCE (%) | References | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| One-step | MASnI3 | c-TiO2/m-TiO2/perovskite/spiro-MeOTAD/Au | 0.68 | 16.30 | 48 | 5.23 | [ |
| One-step | MASnI2Br | c-TiO2/m-TiO2/perovskite/spiro-MeOTAD/Au | 0.77 | 14.38 | 50 | 5.48 | [ |
| One-step | MASnIBr2 | c-TiO2/m-TiO2/perovskite/spiro-MeOTAD/Au | 0.82 | 12.30 | 57 | 5.73 | [ |
| One-step | MASnBr3 | c-TiO2/m-TiO2/perovskite/spiro-MeOTAD/Au | 0.88 | 8.26 | 59 | 4.27 | [ |
| One-step | MASnI3 | c-TiO2/m-TiO2/perovskite/spiro-MeOTAD/Au | 0.716 | 15.18 | 50.07 | 5.44 | [ |
| One-step | MASnI3 | c-TiO2/m-TiO2/perovskite/spiro-MeOTAD/Au | 0.88 | 16.8 | 42 | 6.4 | [ |
| One-step | MASnI3 | c-TiO2/m-TiO2/perovskite/spiro-MeOTAD/Au | 0.79 | 13.40 | 52 | 5.49 | [ |
| One-step | CsSnI3 + 20% SnF2 | c-TiO2/m-TiO2/perovskite/spiro-MeOTAD/Au | 0.201 | 27.67 | 29 | 1.66 | [ |
| One-step | CsSnI2Br + 20% SnF2 | c-TiO2/m-TiO2/perovskite/spiro-MeOTAD/Au | 0.289 | 15.06 | 38 | 1.67 | [ |
| One-step | CsSnIBr2 + 20% SnF2 | c-TiO2/m-TiO2/perovskite/spiro-MeOTAD/Au | 0.311 | 11.57 | 43 | 1.56 | [ |
| One-step | CsSnI2.9Br0.1 + 20% SnF2 | c-TiO2/m-TiO2/perovskite/spiro-MeOTAD/Au | 0.222 | 24.16 | 33 | 1.76 | [ |
| One-step | FASnI3 + 20% SnF2 | c-TiO2/m-TiO2/perovskite/spiro-MeOTAD/Au | 0.238 | 24.45 | 36 | 2.10 | [ |
| One-step | CsSnBr3 + 20% SnF2 | c-TiO2/m-TiO2/perovskite/spiro-MeOTAD/Au | 0.42 | 9.1 | 57 | 2.17 | [ |
| One-step | MASnIBr2 | c-TiO2/m-TiO2/perovskite/spiro-MeOTAD/Au | 0.69 | 15.9 | 49 | 5.36 | [ |
| One-step | MASnI3 + 20% SnF2 | c-TiO2/m-TiO2/perovskite/PTAA/Au | 0.25 | 26.1 | 30 | 1.94 | [ |
| One-step | {en}FASnI3 + 15% SnF2 | c-TiO2/m-TiO2/perovskite/PTAA/Au | 0.48 | 22.54 | 65.96 | 7.14 | [ |
| One-step | {en}FASnI3 + 15% SnF2 | c-TiO2/m-TiO2/perovskite/PTAA/Au | 0.46 | 22.54 | 69.74 | 7.23 | [ |
| One-step | {PN}FASnI3 + 15% SnF2 | c-TiO2/m-TiO2/perovskite/TPE/Au | 0.44 | 22.15 | 60.67 | 5.85 | [ |
| One-step | {TN}FASnI3 + 15% SnF2 | c-TiO2/m-TiO2/perovskite/PTAA/Au | 0.40 | 22.72 | 61.04 | 5.53 | [ |
| One-step | {en}MASnI3 + 15% SnF2 | c-TiO2/m-TiO2/perovskite/PTAA/Au | 0.43 | 24.28 | 63.72 | 6.63 | [ |
| One-step | MASnBr3 | c-TiO2/m-TiO2/perovskite/PTAA/Au | 0.307 | 1.22 | 36.8 | 0.14 | [ |
| One-step | CsSnI3 + 20% SnF2 | c-TiO2/m-TiO2/perovskite/ | 0.24 | 22.70 | 37 | 2.02 | [ |
| One-step | MASnCl3 | c-TiO2/perovskite/CuSCN/Ag | 0.576 | 12.89 | 55 | 3.41 | [ |
| One-step | CsSnI3 | NiO/perovskite/PCBM/Al | 0.52 | 10.21 | 62.5 | 3.31 | [ |
| One-step | CsSnI3 | c-TiO2/perovskite/spiro-MeOTAD/Au | 0.48 | 8.11 | 19.8 | 0.77 | [ |
| One-step | HEA0.4FA0.6SnI3 | c-TiO2/m-TiO2/perovskite/Al2O3/C | 0.37 | 18.52 | 56.2 | 3.9 | [ |
| One-step | GA0.2FA0.78SnI3 + 1% EDAI2 | PEDOT:PSS/perovskite/C60/BCP/Ag | 0.61 | 21.2 | 72 | 9.6 | [ |
| One-step | FASnI3 | PEDOT:PSS/perovskite/PCBM/BCP/Ag | 0.49 | 22.24 | 65.19 | 7.15 | [ |
| One-step | FASnI3 | SnO2/perovskite/PCBM/BCP/Ag | 0.55 | 19.39 | 68.82 | 7.34 | [ |
| One-step | FASnI3 | PEDOT:PSS/perovskite/C60/BCP/Ag | 0.63 | 21.6 | 74.7 | 10.17 | [ |
| One-step | FASnI3 | PEDOT:PSS/perovskite/C60/BCP/Ag | 0.628 | 22.25 | 74.2 | 10.37 | [ |
| One-step | PEAxFA1−xSnI3 + NH4SCN | PEDOT:PSS/perovskite/ICBA/BCP/Ag | 0.94 | 17.4 | 75 | 12.4 | [ |
| One-step | FASnI3 + 5% PHCl | PEDOT:PSS/perovskite/C60/BCP/Ag | 0.76 | 23.5 | 64 | 11.4 | [ |
| Hot-casting | BA2MA3Sn4I13 + 100% SnF2 | c-TiO2/m-TiO2/perovskite/PTAA/Au | 0.229 | 24.1 | 45.7 | 2.53 | [ |
| Hot-casting | MASnI3 + 20% SnF2/hydrazine | c-TiO2/m-TiO2/perovskite/PTAA/Au | 0.378 | 19.92 | 51.73 | 3.89 | [ |
| Hot-casting | CsSnI3 + 20% SnF2/hydrazine | c-TiO2/m-TiO2/perovskite/PTAA/Au | 0.170 | 30.75 | 34.88 | 1.83 | [ |
| Hot-casting | CsSnBr3 + 20% SnF2 | c-TiO2/m-TiO2/perovskite/PTAA/Au | 0.367 | 13.96 | 59.36 | 3.04 | [ |
| Hot-casting | MASnI3 | PEDOT/perovskite/PCBM/Al | 0.595 | 17.8 | 29.8 | 3.2 | [ |
| Vapor-assisted | MASnI3 | c-TiO2/m-TiO2/perovskite/PTAA/Au | 0.273 | 17.36 | 39.1 | 1.86 | [ |
| Vapor-assisted | MASnI3−xBrx | c-TiO2/m-TiO2/perovskite/PTAA/Au | 0.452 | 5.02 | 48.3 | 1.10 | [ |
| Solvent-engineering | FASnI3 + 10% SnF2 + pyrazine | c-TiO2/m-TiO2/perovskite/spiro-MeOTAD/Au | 0.32 | 23.7 | 63 | 4.8 | [ |
| Solvent-engineering | FASnI3 + 20% SnF2 | c-TiO2/m-TiO2/perovskite/spiro-MeOTAD/Au | 0.38 | 23.09 | 60.01 | 5.27 | [ |
| Solvent-engineering | MASnI3 + 20% SnF2 | c-TiO2/m-TiO2/perovskite/spiro-MeOTAD/Au | 0.232 | 26.0 | 38.6 | 2.33 | [ |
| Solvent-engineering | FASnI3 + 10% SnF2 | PEDOT:PSS/perovskite/C60/BCP/Ag | 0.47 | 22.07 | 60.67 | 6.22 | [ |
| Solvent-engineering | FASnI3 + 20% PEAI + 10% SnF2 | NiO/perovskite/PCBM/Al | 0.59 | 14.44 | 69 | 5.94 | [ |
| Solvent-engineering | (FA)0.75(MA)0.25SnI3 + 10% SnF2 | PEDOT:PSS/perovskite/C60/BCP/Ag | 0.61 | 21.2 | 62.7 | 8.12 | [ |
| Solvent-engineering | (FA)0.5(MA)0.5SnI3 + 10% SnF2 | PEDOT:PSS/perovskite/C60/BCP/Ag | 0.53 | 21.3 | 52.4 | 5.92 | [ |
| Solvent-engineering | (FA)0.25(MA)0.75SnI3 + 10% SnF2 | PEDOT:PSS/perovskite/C60/BCP/Ag | 0.48 | 20.7 | 45.2 | 4.49 | [ |
| Solvent-engineering | FASnI3 + 10% SnF2 | PEDOT:PSS/perovskite/C60/BCP/Ag | 0.48 | 21.3 | 64.6 | 6.60 | [ |
| Solvent-engineering | MASnI3 + 10% SnF2 | PEDOT:PSS/perovskite/C60/BCP/Ag | 0.46 | 21.4 | 42.7 | 4.29 | [ |
| Solvent-engineering | 0.92FASnI3 + 0.08PEAI + 10% SnF2 | PEDOT:PSS/perovskite/C60/BCP/Ag | 0.525 | 24.1 | 71 | 9.0 | [ |
| Solvent-engineering | FASnI2Br | PEDOT:PSS/perovskite/C60/Ca/Al | 0.467 | 6.82 | 54 | 1.72 | [ |
| Solvent-engineering | MA0.9Cs0.1SnI3 | PEDOT:PSS/perovskite/PCBM/Bis-C60/Ag | 0.20 | 4.53 | 36.4 | 0.33 | [ |
| Solvent-engineering | FA0.8Cs0.2SnI3 | PEDOT:PSS/perovskite/PCBM/Bis-C60/Ag | 0.24 | 16.05 | 35.8 | 1.38 | [ |
| Solvent-engineering | FASnI3 | PEDOT:PSS/perovskite/PCBM/Bis-C60/Ag | 0.04 | 11.73 | 23.4 | 0.11 | [ |
| Solvent-engineering | PEA2SnI4 | NiOx/perovskite/PCBM/BCP/Ag | 0.61 | 22.0 | 70.1 | 9.41 | [ |
| Solvent-engineering | (BA0.5PEA0.5)2FA3Sn4I13 | PEDOT:PSS/perovskite/C60/LiF/Al | 0.60 | 21.82 | 66.73 | 8.82 | [ |
| Solvent-engineering | AVA2FAn−1SnnI3n+1 | PEDOT:PSS/perovskite/PCBM/BCP/Ag | 0.61 | 21.0 | 68 | 8.71 | [ |
| Solvent-engineering | (4AMP)(FA)3Sn4I13 | c-TiO2/ZrO2/perovskite/C | 0.64 | 14.9 | 44.3 | 4.42 | [ |
| Quantum rods | CsSnI3 | c-TiO2/perovskite/spiro-MeOTAD/Au | 0.86 | 23.2 | 65 | 12.96 | [ |
| Quantum rods | CsSnBr3 | c-TiO2/perovskite/spiro-MeOTAD/Au | 0.85 | 21.23 | 58 | 10.46 | [ |
| Quantum rods | CsSnCl3 | c-TiO2/perovskite/spiro-MeOTAD/Au | 0.87 | 19.82 | 56 | 9.66 | [ |
| Sequential deposition | FASnI3 + 10% SnF2 + TMA | SnO2/C60/perovskite/spiro-MeOTAD/Ag | 0.31 | 21.65 | 64.7 | 4.34 | [ |
| Sequential deposition | FASnI3 + 10% SnF2 + TMA | PEDOT:PSS/perovskite/C60/Bis-C60/Ag | 0.47 | 22.45 | 0.68 | 7.09 | [ |
| Sequential deposition | FASnI3 | PEDOT:PSS/perovskite/C60/BCP/Ag | 0.33 | 17.78 | 67.9 | 3.98 | [ |
| Thermal evaporation | MASnBr3 | c-TiO2/perovskite/P3HT/Au | 0.498 | 4.27 | 49.1 | 1.12 | [ |
| Thermal evaporation | CsSnBr3 + 2.5% SnF2 | MoO3/perovskite/C60/BCP/Ag | 0.40 | 2.4 | 55 | 0.55 | [ |
| Thermal evaporation | (PEA, FA) SnI3 | LiF/PEDOT:PSS/perovskite/C60/BCP/Ag | 0.47 | 20.07 | 74 | 6.98 | [ |
| Thermal evaporation | MASnI3 | PEDOT:PSS/TPD/perovskite/C60/BCP/Ag | 0.377 | 12.1 | 36.6 | 1.7 | [ |
| Thermal evaporation | CsSnI3 | ITO/perovskite/Au/Ti | 0.42 | 4.80 | 22 | 0.88 | [ |
| Direct dropping | MASnIBr1.8Cl0.2 + 20% SnF2 | c-TiO2/m-TiO2/m-Al2O3/perovskite/C | 0.38 | 13.99 | 57.3 | 3.11 | [ |
| Hot-dropping | CsSnIBr2 + 60% SnF2 + H3PO2 | c-TiO2/m-TiO2/m-Al2O3/perovskite/C | 0.31 | 17.4 | 56 | 3.2 | [ |
| Solvent-engineering | FASnI3 + PEABr + 10% SnF2 | PEDOT:PSS/perovskite/C60/BCP/Cu | 0.45 | 24.87 | 63 | 7.05 | [ |
| Solvent-engineering | FASnI3 + 2.5% N2H5Cl + 10% SnF2 | PEDOT:PSS/perovskite/PCBM/BCP/Ag | 0.455 | 17.64 | 67.3 | 5.40 | [ |
| Solvent-engineering | FASnI3 + 12% SnF2 | PEDOT:PSS(PEG)/perovskite/PCBM/BCP/Ag | 0.455 | 17.64 | 67.3 | 5.40 | [ |
| Solvent-engineering | MASnI3 + 20% SnF2 | PEDOT:PSS/perovskite/C60/BCP/Ag | 0.45 | 11.82 | 40 | 2.14 | [ |
| Solvent-engineering | FASnI3 + 1% EDAI2 | PEDOT:PSS/perovskite/C60/BCP/Ag | 0.583 | 21.3 | 0.72 | 8.9 | [ |
| Solvent-engineering | FASnI3 | PEDOT:PSS/perovskite/C60/BCP/Ag | 0.638 | 21.95 | 0.725 | 10.16 | [ |
Fig. 6a XRD patterns of one-step deposited (FA)x(MA)1−xSnI3 (x = 0.00, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, and 1.00) films on ITO/poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)-poly(styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS) substrates. b Absorption spectra and c normalized PL spectra of the different perovskite films on quartz substrates. d A 2 × 2 × 2 supercell of (FA)2Sn2I6 depicting a model of the hollow perovskite with two SnI2 vacancies [(FA)16Sn14I44]. e XRD patterns and f optical absorption of the {en}FASnI3 perovskite crystals with various molar ratios of FA to {en}. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [88]
Fig. 7a Schematic structures of mixed FA/PEA Sn perovskites with PEAI/FAI doping ratios of 0, 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100%. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [127]. b Three alternative views of the archetypal 3D perovskite structure viewed along the (100), (110), and (111) cleavage planes. c “Perovskitoid” face-sharing building block of the 1D structures obtained for t > 1 representing the archetypal hexagonal polytype. d Perovskite structures obtained through dimensional reduction featuring corner-sharing 2D sheets and 1D chains through the (100) and (110) cleavage planes, respectively. e Hexagonal perovskite polytypes obtained from a linear combination of the corner-sharing 3D perovskite along the (111) cleavage plane and the 1D face-sharing polytype. The “h” and “c” symbols indicate hexagonal and cubic layers, respectively, and serve in identifying the layer sequence that characterizes the polytype. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [135]
Fig. 8a Bandgaps of various Ge-based perovskite materials compared with MAPbI3. b Atomic structures of MAPbI3 and MABiSeI2. c Calculated bandgaps of CH3NH3BiXY2 compounds (with X = S, Se, Te and Y = Cl, Br, or I) using the Heyd–Scuseria–Ernzerhof functional with spin–orbit coupling. The dashed line marks the optimal bandgap for single-junction solar cell according to the Shockley–Queisser theory. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [52]
Fig. 9a Tauc plot for CsSnI3, CsGeI3, MAGeI3, and FAGeI3 showing optical bandgaps of 1.29, 1.63, 2.0, and 2.35 eV, respectively. b Energy level pattern for the PSCs with CsGeI3, MAGeI3, and FAGeI3 absorbers. c Comparison of J–V curves of CsGeI3 and MAGeI3 solar cells. d-f SEM images for CsGeI3, MAGeI3, and FAGeI3 films both deposited on the compact TiO2/mesoporous TiO2 substrates. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [60]
Fig. 10a Crystal structure of MA2CuCl2Br2, showing the alternation of organic and inorganic layers and the Cu-X bond lengths in the inorganic framework. b Electronic band structure of MA2CuClBr3 investigated by DFT simulation. c J–V curve of solar cells sensitized with MA2CuCl2Br2 (red) and MA2CuCl0.5Br3.5 (brown) under 1 sun of light illumination. The red and brown dashed lines represent dark current. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [63]
Fig. 11a A representation of the layered structure of (CH3NH3)3Bi2I9, characterized by isolated [Bi2I9]3− anions and two crystallographic inequivalent CH3NH3+ cations. b Small single-crystal powder grown from Bi2O3 and CH3NH3I in concentrated HI (I–III). And (CH3NH3)3Bi2I9 thin films deposited by the antisolvent assisted crystallization method (ASAC) using GBL/DMSO and GBL as solvents and chlorobenzene as antisolvent (IV). c Diffraction patterns of (CH3NH3)3Bi2I9 thin films, powder and simulated powder from single-crystal XRD measurements. d EQE of a typical FTO/TiO2/(CH3NH3)3Bi2I9/spiro-MeOTAD/Au device. e J–V scanning of the best-forming device. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [163]
Fig. 12a Schematic diagram of (CH3NH3)3Bi2I9 solution-assisted process. b Crystal structure and (001) view of (CH3NH3)3Bi2I9. c SEM image of (CH3NH3)3Bi2I9 thin film. d Stability measurement of (CH3NH3)3Bi2I9 in air. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [164]
Fig. 13a Fabrication procedure and b SEM image of (CH3NH3)3Bi2I9 film. c Cross-sectional SEM image of (CH3NH3)3Bi2I9-based solar cells. d Forward and backward scanning and e IPCE spectra of the best-forming device. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [166]
Photovoltaic parameters of PSCs based on various Bi-based perovskite absorbers
| Preparation process | Absorber | Device architecture | FF (%) | PCE (%) | References | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| One-step spin coating | Cs3Bi2I9 | c-TiO2/m-TiO2/perovskite/P3HT/Ag | 0.31 | 0.34 | 38 | 0.40 | [ |
| One-step spin coating | (CH3NH3)3Bi2I9 | c-TiO2/perovskite/spiro/Au | 0.72 | 0.49 | 31.8 | 0.11 | [ |
| One-step spin coating | (CH3NH3)3Bi2I9 | c-TiO2/m-TiO2/perovskite/spiro-MeOTAD/Au | 0.68 | 0.38 | 88 | 0.22 | [ |
| One-step spin coating | (CH3NH3)3Bi2I9 | c-TiO2/m-TiO2/perovskite/spiro-MeOTAD/Ag | 0.68 | 0.52 | 33 | 0.12 | [ |
| One-step spin coating | Cs3Bi2I9 | c-TiO2/m-TiO2/perovskite/spiro-MeOTAD/Ag | 0.85 | 2.15 | 60 | 1.09 | [ |
| One-step spin coating | (CH3NH3)3Bi2I9Clx | c-TiO2/m-TiO2/perovskite/spiro-MeOTAD/Ag | 0.04 | 0.18 | 38 | 0.03 | [ |
| One-step spin coating | (CH3NH3)3Bi2I9 | c-TiO2/m-TiO2/perovskite/P3HT/Au | 0.35 | 1.157 | 46.4 | 0.19 | [ |
| One-step spin coating | (CH3NH3)3Bi2I9 | c-TiO2/m-TiO2/perovskite/PIF8-TAA/Au | 0.85 | 1.22 | 73 | 0.71 | [ |
| Two-step evaporation spin coating | (CH3NH3)3Bi2I9 | PEDOT:PSS/perovskite/C60/BCP/Ag | 0.83 | 1.39 | 37 | 0.39 | [ |
| Two-step thermal evaporation | (CH3NH3)3Bi2I9 | c-TiO2/m-TiO2/perovskite/spiro-MeOTAD/Au | 0.83 | 3.00 | 79 | 1.64 | [ |
| Vapor-assisted solution process | (CH3NH3)3Bi2I9 | c-TiO2/m-TiO2/perovskite/P3HT/Au | 1.01 | 4.02 | 78 | 3.17 | [ |
| One-step spin coating | Cs3Bi2I9 | c-TiO2/perovskite/spiro-MeOTAD/Au | 0.79 | 4.45 | 50.34 | 1.77 | [ |
| One-step spin coating | Cs3Bi2I9 | c-TiO2/perovskite/CuI/Au | 0.86 | 5.78 | 64.38 | 3.20 | [ |
| One-step spin coating | Cs3Bi2I9 | c-TiO2/perovskite/PTAA/Au | 0.83 | 4.82 | 57.49 | 2.30 | [ |
Fig. 14a Crystal structure of (CH3NH3)3Sb2I9 (space group P63/mmc). b Illuminated J–V curves of (CH3NH3)3Sb2I9 solar cell measured with forward and backward scanning with a rate of 0.1 V s−1. c EQE measurement of the (CH3NH3)3Sb2I9 solar cell compared to the reference device of ITO/PEDOT/PCBM/ZnO-NP/Al. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [173] d Schematic plot of the Cl doping-induced transformation from the 0D dimer phase of A3Sb2I9 to the 2D layered phase of A3Sb2ClXI9−X. e Schematic structure of the as-fabricated PSC. f XRD patterns of the films deposited from precursors containing SbI3, MAI, and MACl with molar ratios of 1:1.5:0, 1:0:1.5, 1:0.5:1.5, and 1:1:1.2. g Measured UV–vis absorbance spectra of the four types of films. h Tauc plots of the absorption coefficients for evaluating the bandgap values of the pure-iodine perovskites MA3Sb2I9 and Cl-containing mixed-halide perovskites MA3Sb2ClXI9−X. i J–V curves for the devices fabricated with the four kinds of perovskite films. j Steady-state photocurrent output for the device based on 1-1-1.2 film at the maximum power point (red circle). Maximum power point voltage Vmpp is equal to 0.54 V. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [176]
Fig. 15Crystal structure of double perovskite A2B(I)B(III)X6 (a) and the elements/functional groups that can form double perovskite A2B(I)B(III)X6 (b)
Fig. 16a Schematic illustration of the spin coating process of Cs2AgBiBr4 with and without antisolvent dropping program, and the morphology of the as-prepared film. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [189] b Scheme of sequential vapor deposition process. c J–V curve of the optimized solar cell. Inset: Cross-sectional SEM image of the device. d EQE spectrum and the integrated current density with AM 1.5G photon flux. e Evaluation of long-term stability of the solar cells stored in dry box. Reproduced with permission from Ref. [191]
Photovoltaic parameters of PSCs based on double perovskite A2B(I)B(III)X6 absorbers
| Absorber | Method for preparing perovskite film | Device architecture | FF (%) | PCE (%) | References | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cs2AgBiBr6 | Spin coating | c-TiO2/m-TiO2/perovskite/spiro-MeOTAD/Au | 0.98 | 3.93 | 63 | 2.43 | [ |
| Cs2AgBiBr6 | Low-pressure-assisted solution processing under ambient conditions | SnO2/Cs2AgBiBr6/P3HT/Au | 1.04 | 1.78 | 78 | 1.44 | [ |
| Cs2AgBiBr6 | Antisolvent dropping technology and post-annealing process | Cu-NiO/Cs2AgBiBr6/C60/BCP/Ag | 1.00 | 3.23 | 68.4 | 2.21 | [ |
| Cs2AgBiBr6 | Sequential vapor deposition method | c-TiO2/perovskite/P3HT/Au | – | – | – | 1.37 | [ |
| Cs2AgBiBr6 | Spin coating deposition and annealing at high temperature | c-TiO2/m-TiO2/perovskite/PTAA/Au | 1.02 | 1.84 | 67 | 1.26 | [ |
| Cs2AgBiBr6 | Spin coating deposition and annealing at high temperature | c-TiO2/m-TiO2/perovskite/PCPDTBT/Au | 0.71 | 1.67 | 57 | 0.68 | [ |
| Cs2AgBiBr6 | Spin coating deposition and annealing at high temperature | c-TiO2/m-TiO2/perovskite/spiro-MeOTAD/Au | 0.64 | 2.45 | 57 | 0.90 | [ |
| Cs2NaBiI6 | Spin coating | c-TiO2/m-TiO2/perovskite/spiro-MeOTAD/Au | 0.47 | 1.99 | 44 | 0.42 | [ |