| Literature DB >> 34137837 |
Ling Yeung1,2, Yih-Cherng Lee3, Yu-Tze Lin1, Tay-Wey Lee4, Chi-Chun Lai1,2.
Abstract
Purpose: To examine whether deep-learning denoised optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) images could enhance automated macular ischemia quantification in branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34137837 PMCID: PMC8212432 DOI: 10.1167/tvst.10.7.23
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol ISSN: 2164-2591 Impact factor: 3.283
Figure 1.Effect of different denoising methods in an eye with severe macular ischemia. (A) Original OCTA image. (B) VD map provided by machine software. Numbers in grids show machine-derived VDs, which were significantly overestimated in grids with diffuse speckle noise. (C) The whitish area denotes the parafoveal NPA calculated from the dark blue regions in (B). (D) Global thresholding by Otsu method. (E) Local adaptive thresholding by the Phansalkar method. (F) Red boundaries demarcate superior and inferior half-ring subfields used for macular ischemia grading. (G) NN denoised OCTA image. (H) Perfusion density map calculated from denoised OCTA image. (I) The whitish area denotes the NPA calculated using the denoised OCTA image.
Figure 2.Proposed architecture of encoder (a) and decoder (b) NN in this study.
Figure 3.Representative OCTA images used for the training and testing of our NN model. (A–C) Normal eye. (D–F) An eye with proliferative DR. (A, D) Original OCTA images. (B, F) Ground truth images with manually segmented vascular components. (C, F) Superimposing the ground truth images on the respective original OCTA images.
The Performance of the NN Model Across Different Scan Qualities of Testing Images
| Scan Quality | No. of Images | Accuracy | Precision | Recall (Sensitivity) | Specificity | F1 Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 4 | 0.894 | 0.729 | 0.786 | 0.921 | 0.753 |
| 7 | 11 | 0.874 | 0.835 | 0.733 | 0.935 | 0.780 |
| 8 | 12 | 0.857 | 0.851 | 0.754 | 0.918 | 0.799 |
| 9 | 3 | 0.830 | 0.727 | 0.806 | 0.847 | 0.758 |
| Overall |
Figure 4.Representative cases of macular ischemia of different severity. Speckle noise on OCTA image is not obvious in control eye (A) and eye of mild macular ischemia (E). However, speckle noise becomes visible in moderate macular ischemia (I) and is substantial in severe macular ischemia (M). Possible significant false-positive vascular signals (N).
Pearson Correlation Between Machine-Derived Image Parameters and Denoised OCTA Image Parameters
| Machine | Denoised | Coefficient |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VD | ||||
| Control ( | 49.2 ± 2.9 | 41.1 ± 3.0 | 0.754 | <0.001 |
| BRVO ( | 41.2 ± 5.7 | 33.2 ± 5.6 | 0.878 | <0.001 |
| Mild | 46.4 ± 3.5 | 37.9 ± 3.8 | 0.846 | <0.001 |
| Moderate | 38.5 ± 3.8 | 31.4 ± 3.0 | 0.742 | <0.001 |
| Severe | 34.7 ± 2.6 | 24.6 ± 3.9 | 0.387 | 0.391 |
| Size of NPA (mm2) | ||||
| Control ( | 0.15 ± 0.16 | 0.13 ± 0.12 | 0.811 | <0.001 |
| BRVO ( | 1.28 ± 0.82 | 1.51 ± 0.92 | 0.918 | <0.001 |
| Mild | 0.51 ± 0.38 | 0.64 ± 0.49 | 0.899 | <0.001 |
| Moderate | 1.69 ± 0.56 | 1.89 ± 0.44 | 0.780 | <0.001 |
| Severe | 2.24 ± 0.48 | 2.94 ± 0.56 | 0.595 | 0.091 |
Expressed as mean ± standard deviation.
AUC Based on Different Quantitative Parameters
| AUC | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Control vs. BRVO | Mild vs. Moderate | Moderate vs. Severe | |
| VD | |||
| VD from machine-derived image | 0.883 | 0.945 | 0.802 |
| VD from denoised image | 0.884 | 0.910 | 0.927 |
| | 0.961 | 0.167 | 0.042 |
| NPA | |||
| NPA from machine-derived image | 0.935 | 0.964 | 0.797 |
| NPA from denoised image | 0.950 | 0.959 | 0.946 |
| | 0.067 | 0.646 | 0.022 |
The comparison of AUCs was performed using DeLong's test.