Literature DB >> 34137286

Review of Low-Cost 3D Bioprinters: State of the Market and Observed Future Trends.

Anh Tong1, Quang Long Pham1, Paul Abatemarco1, Austin Mathew2, Dhruv Gupta1, Siddharth Iyer1, Roman Voronov1,2.   

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting has become mainstream for precise and repeatable high-throughput fabrication of complex cell cultures and tissue constructs in drug testing and regenerative medicine, food products, dental and medical implants, biosensors, and so forth. Due to this tremendous growth in demand, an overwhelming amount of hardware manufacturers have recently flooded the market with different types of low-cost bioprinter models-a price segment that is most affordable to typical-sized laboratories. These machines range in sophistication, type of the underlying printing technology, and possible add-ons/features, which makes the selection process rather daunting (especially for a nonexpert customer). Yet, the review articles available in the literature mostly focus on the technical aspects of the printer technologies under development, as opposed to explaining the differences in what is already on the market. In contrast, this paper provides a snapshot of the fast-evolving low-cost bioprinter niche, as well as reputation profiles (relevant to delivery time, part quality, adherence to specifications, warranty, maintenance, etc.) of the companies selling these machines. Specifically, models spanning three dominant technologies-microextrusion, droplet-based/inkjet, and light-based/crosslinking-are reviewed. Additionally, representative examples of high-end competitors (including up-and-coming microfluidics-based bioprinters) are discussed to highlight their major differences and advantages relative to the low-cost models. Finally, forecasts are made based on the trends observed during this survey, as to the anticipated trickling down of the high-end technologies to the low-cost printers. Overall, this paper provides insight for guiding buyers on a limited budget toward making informed purchasing decisions in this fast-paced market.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bioprinting; crosslinking; droplet; extrusion; inkjet; low cost; market; microfluidics; trends

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34137286     DOI: 10.1177/24726303211020297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  SLAS Technol        ISSN: 2472-6303            Impact factor:   3.047


  4 in total

1.  Designing Cost-Effective Open-Source Multihead 3D Bioprinters.

Authors:  David Chimene; Kaivalya A Deo; Jeremy Thomas; Landon Dahle; Cole Mandrona; Akhilesh K Gaharwar
Journal:  GEN Biotechnol       Date:  2022-08-18

2.  Three-dimensional printing of clinical scale and personalized calcium phosphate scaffolds for alveolar bone reconstruction.

Authors:  Margaret Anderson; Nileshkumar Dubey; Kath Bogie; Chen Cao; Junying Li; Joseph Lerchbacker; Gustavo Mendonça; Frederic Kauffmann; Marco C Bottino; Darnell Kaigler
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 5.687

Review 3.  A Minireview of Microfluidic Scaffold Materials in Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Anh Tong; Roman Voronov
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2022-01-11

Review 4.  Portable hand-held bioprinters promote in situ tissue regeneration.

Authors:  Zahra Pazhouhnia; Nima Beheshtizadeh; Mojdeh Salehi Namini; Nasrin Lotfibakhshaiesh
Journal:  Bioeng Transl Med       Date:  2022-03-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.