| Literature DB >> 34136861 |
Rebekah L Lawrence1, Matthew C Ruder1, Vasilios Moutzouros2, Eric C Makhni2, Stephanie J Muh2, Daniel Siegal3, Steven B Soliman3, Marnix van Holsbeeck3, Michael J Bey1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Approximately 20-60% of rotator cuff repairs fail with higher failure rates in patients with larger or more chronic tears. Although MRI provides an objective estimate of tear size, it can only provide qualitative descriptions of tear chronicity. By contrast, ultrasound shear wave elastography (SWE) may assess tear chronicity by estimating tissue mechanical properties (ie, shear modulus). Furthermore, SWE imaging does not share many of the challenges associated with MRI (eg, high cost, risk of claustrophobia). Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the extent to which estimated supraspinatus shear modulus is associated with conventional MRI-based measures of rotator cuff tear size and chronicity.Entities:
Keywords: Atrophy; Fatty degeneration; Mechanical properties; Rotator cuff; Tear size; Ultrasound shear wave elastography
Year: 2021 PMID: 34136861 PMCID: PMC8178591 DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.11.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JSES Int ISSN: 2666-6383
Demographic and patient-reported outcome measures for all participants (n = 31).
| Variable | Mean ± SD or % |
|---|---|
| Demographics | |
| Age | 61 ± 7 years |
| Sex (% female) | 18.2 |
| BMI | 26.3 ± 3.1 kg/m2 |
| Involved side (% dominant) | 63.6 |
| Patient-reported measures | |
| Symptom duration | 9 ± 8 months |
| VAS | 2 ± 2 |
| VAS (worst in last week) | 8 ± 2 |
| WORC | 37 ± 16 |
Body mass index.
Visual analog scale.
Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index.
Descriptive statistics for conventional MRI-based measures of tear chronicity.
| MRI measure | Mean ± SD or % |
|---|---|
| Supraspinatus tear size | |
| Anterior/posterior (cm) | 1.6 ± 0.6 |
| Retraction (cm) | 1.7 ± 0.6 |
| Involved tendons (%) | |
| Isolated supraspinatus | 54.5 |
| Supraspinatus and infraspinatus | 27.3 |
| Supraspinatus and subscapularis | 18.2 |
| Fatty degeneration (Goutallier) | |
| Grade 0 (%) | 72.7 |
| Grade 1 (%) | 27.3 |
| Grade 2 (%) | 0 |
| Grade 3 (%) | 0 |
| Grade 4 (%) | 0 |
| Muscle atrophy | |
| Occupation ratio (%) | 65 ± 13 |
| Tangent sign (% positive) | 9.1 |
Calculation for involved tendons includes partial- or full-thickness tears of the infraspinatus and subscapularis.
Figure 1Correlations between tear dimensions and estimated supraspinatus shear modulus for each combination of region (intramuscular tendon, muscle) and condition (passive, active): (A) anterior/posterior tear size, (B) tear retraction.
Figure 2Correlations between occupation ratio and estimated supraspinatus shear modulus for each combination of region (intramuscular tendon, muscle) and condition (passive, active): (A) anterior/posterior tear size, (B) tear retraction.
Figure 3Comparison of estimated supraspinatus shear modulus across Goutallier grades for each combination of region (intramuscular tendon, muscle) and condition (passive, active). On each box, the solid line indicates the median, the dashed line represents the mean, the bottom and top edges indicate the 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively. The whiskers extend to the most extreme data points not considered outliers, and the outliers are plotted individually using the ‘+’ symbol.