| Literature DB >> 34135875 |
Guangsen Fan1,2, Pengxiao Liu1,2, Xu Chang3, Huan Yin1,2, Liujie Cheng1,2, Chao Teng1,2, Yi Gong1,2, Xiuting Li1,2.
Abstract
Baijiu is an important fermented product in China. A yeast named YX3307 that is capable of producing a large amount of ethyl caproate (EC) was isolated from Daqu, a crude fermentation starter for Baijiu. This yeast was identified as Clavispora lusitaniae on the basis of its morphological properties, physiological and biochemical characteristics, and 26S rDNA sequence. Single-factor experiments were conducted to obtain the optimum fermentation conditions for EC production by YX3307. The highest EC yield (62.0 mg/L) from YX3307 was obtained with the following culture conditions: inoculum size 7.5% (v/v), seed cell age 30 h, sorghum hydrolysate medium (SHM) with a sugar content of 10 Brix and an initial pH of 6.0; incubation at 28°C with shaking at 180 rpm for 32 h; addition of 10% (v/v) anhydrous ethanol and 0.04% (v/v) caproic acid at 32 and 40 h, respectively, static culture at 20°C until 72 h. YX3307 synthesized more EC than ethyl acetate, ethyl lactate, ethyl butyrate, and ethyl octanoate. An intracellular enzyme or cell membrane enzyme was responsible for EC synthesis. YX3307 can produce many flavor compounds that are important for high-quality Baijiu. Thus, it has potential applications in improving the flavor and quality of Baijiu.Entities:
Keywords: Baijiu; Clavispora lusitaniae; ethyl caproate; fermentation optimization; identification
Year: 2021 PMID: 34135875 PMCID: PMC8200637 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.663744
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
FIGURE 1Colony morphology on WL (A) and cell morphology (B) of strain YX3307 captured by microscopy (10 × 40). Cell was stained by the crystal violet method. The asexual budding reproduction occurred at the ends of the cells was highlighted in the blue circle.
Physiological and biochemical characteristics tests.
| Sugars | Characteristics of YX3307 | Sugars | Characteristics of YX3307 | Sugars | Characteristics of YX3307 |
| D-glucose | Acid and gas production | D-galactose | Acid and gas production | D-maltose | Acid and gas production |
| D-saccharose | Acid and gas production | D-lactose | No acid, no gas | Inulin | Acid production, no gas |
| Melibiose | No acid, no gas | Cellobiose | Acid and gas production | D-xylose | No acid, no gas |
| D-raffinose | Acid and gas production | D-trehalose | Acid production, no gas | Soluble starch | No acid, no gas |
| D-arabinose | No acid, no gas | ||||
| Carbon sources | Characteristics of YX3307 | Carbon sources | Characteristics of YX3307 | Carbon sources | Characteristics of YX3307 |
| D-glucose | +++ | D-galactose | +++ | L-sorbose | ++ |
| Cellobiose | ++ | D-lactose | + | D-maltose | +++ |
| Melibiose | − | D-saccharose | ++ | D-trehalose | +++ |
| Melezitose | ++ | D-raffinose | ++ | Inulin | + |
| Soluble starch | − | D-arabinose | − | L-arabinose | + |
| D-ribose | ++ | L-rhamnose | ++ | D-xylose | + |
| Erythritol | − | Galactitol | − | D-sorbitol | +++ |
| Glycerol | ++ | Inositol | − | D-mannitol | +++ |
| Ethyl alcohol | ++ | Ribitol | ++ | Methyl alcohol | − |
| Citric acid | + | DL-lactic acid | ++ | Succinic acid | + |
| D-glucuronic acid | + | α-methyl-glucoside | − | Myricetrin | + |
| D-glucosamine | ++ | Hexadecane | − | ||
| Nitrogen sources | Characteristics of YX3307 | Nitrogen sources | Characteristics of YX3307 | Nitrogen sources | Characteristics of YX3307 |
| Potassium nitrate | + | Cadaverine dihydrochloride | +++ | Ethylamine hydrochloride | ++ |
| Sodium nitrite | − | L-phenylalanine | + | L-lysine | +++ |
| Urea | ++ | Ammonium sulfate | + | Ammonium nitrite | − |
| Riboflavin | ++ | Folic acid | ++ | Pyridoxine hydrochloride | ++ |
| Myo-inositol | ++ | Calcium pantothenate | ++ | Thiamine | +++ |
| Niacin | +++ | ++ | Biotin | ++ | |
| Starch hydrolysis test | − | Methyl red test | − | Indole test | + |
| Voges-Proskauer test | − | Hydrogen sulfide test | − | Urea test | + |
| TTC medium test | − | Citrate test | − | Litmus milk test | − |
| Gelatin liquidized test | − | Lipase activity test | − | CGB agar test | − |
| Formation of extracellular amyloid compounds test | − | Diazonium blue B color reaction | − | Tolerance of 1% of acetic acid test | − |
| DOPA medium test | + | Splitting of arbutin test | + | Actinomycin tolerance test | 0–25 μg/mL |
| Sodium chloride osmolarity test | 0–15% (w/v) | Glucose osmolarity test | 0–80% (w/v) | Caproic acid tolerance test | 0.06% (v/v) |
| Ethanol tolerance test | 0–6% (v/v) | Growth temperature range | 15–50°C (optimum 25°C) | Growth pH range | 1.0–11.0 (optimum pH 6.0) |
| Ethyl caproate tolerance test | 0–1200 mg/L | ||||
FIGURE 2Effect of ethanol content on EC production by YX3307. Same letters in the column indicates that the data do not differ significantly at 5% probability by the Tukey test.
FIGURE 3Effect of caproic acid content on EC production by YX3307. Same letters in the column indicates that the data do not differ significantly at 5% probability by the Tukey test.
FIGURE 4Effect of time of ethanol addition on EC production by YX3307. Same letters in the column indicates that the data do not differ significantly at 5% probability by the Tukey test.
FIGURE 5Effect of time of caproic acid addition on EC production by YX3307. Same letters in the column indicates that the data do not differ significantly at 5% probability by the Tukey test.
FIGURE 6Effect of culture time on EC production by YX3307. Same letters in the column indicates that the data do not differ significantly at 5% probability by the Tukey test.
Summary of yeasts reported for EC yield.
| Grapery | 0.021 | 2018 | ||
| − | 0.5 | 2016 | ||
| 110 | 2013 | |||
| 28.7 | ||||
| 92.0 | ||||
| 28.6 | ||||
| 21.3 | ||||
| 23.2 | ||||
| 1.4 | ||||
| 2.5 | ||||
| 2.5 | ||||
| 1.3 | ||||
| 1.8 | ||||
| 2.94 (g/L, after distilled of fermented grain) | 2013 | |||
| 3.10 (g/L, after distilled of fermented grain) | ||||
| Fermented grain | 4.86 (g/L, after distilled of fermented grain) | |||
| 4.87 (g/L, after distilled of fermented grain) | ||||
| 7.50 (g/L, after distilled of fermented grain) | ||||
| Pit mud | 2.53 (g/L, after distilled of fermented grain) | |||
| Fermented grain | 2.54 (g/L, after distilled of fermented grain) | |||
| 2.56 (g/L, after distilled of fermented grain) | ||||
| 0.21 | 2013 | |||
| 0.005 | ||||
| 0.13 | ||||
| 0.38 | ||||
| – | 1.0 | 2004 | ||
| – | 0.03 mg/kg | 1994 | ||
| 62.0 | 2020 | This study |