Literature DB >> 34135009

Mobile health and privacy: cross sectional study.

Gioacchino Tangari1, Muhammad Ikram2, Kiran Ijaz3, Mohamed Ali Kaafar1, Shlomo Berkovsky3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether and what user data are collected by health related mobile applications (mHealth apps), to characterise the privacy conduct of all the available mHealth apps on Google Play, and to gauge the associated risks to privacy.
DESIGN: Cross sectional study
SETTING: Health related apps developed for the Android mobile platform, available in the Google Play store in Australia and belonging to the medical and health and fitness categories. PARTICIPANTS: Users of 20 991 mHealth apps (8074 medical and 12 917 health and fitness found in the Google Play store: in-depth analysis was done on 15 838 apps that did not require a download or subscription fee compared with 8468 baseline non-mHealth apps. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were characterisation of the data collection operations in the apps code and of the data transmissions in the apps traffic; analysis of the primary recipients for each type of user data; presence of adverts and trackers in the app traffic; audit of the app privacy policy and compliance of the privacy conduct with the policy; and analysis of complaints in negative app reviews.
RESULTS: 88.0% (n=18 472) of mHealth apps included code that could potentially collect user data. 3.9% (n=616) of apps transmitted user information in their traffic. Most data collection operations in apps code and data transmissions in apps traffic involved external service providers (third parties). The top 50 third parties were responsible for most of the data collection operations in app code and data transmissions in app traffic (68.0% (2140), collectively). 23.0% (724) of user data transmissions occurred on insecure communication protocols. 28.1% (5903) of apps provided no privacy policies, whereas 47.0% (1479) of user data transmissions complied with the privacy policy. 1.3% (3609) of user reviews raised concerns about privacy.
CONCLUSIONS: This analysis found serious problems with privacy and inconsistent privacy practices in mHealth apps. Clinicians should be aware of these and articulate them to patients when determining the benefits and risks of mHealth apps. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34135009     DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n1248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  11 in total

1.  A path towards progress: lessons from the hard things about digital mental health.

Authors:  John Torous
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2022-10       Impact factor: 79.683

2.  Multinational landscape of health app policy: toward regulatory consensus on digital health.

Authors:  James A Diao; Kaushik P Venkatesh; Marium M Raza; Joseph C Kvedar
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2022-05-11

Review 3.  Data handling practices and commercial features of apps related to children: a scoping review of content analyses.

Authors:  Lindsay Jibb; Elsie Amoako; Melissa Heisey; Lily Ren; Quinn Grundy
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 4.920

Review 4.  Patient-facing genetic and genomic mobile apps in the UK: a systematic review of content, functionality, and quality.

Authors:  Norina Gasteiger; Amy Vercell; Alan Davies; Dawn Dowding; Naz Khan; Angela Davies
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2022-02-19

Review 5.  Smartphone Apps for Managing Antithrombotic Therapy: Scoping Literature Review.

Authors:  Friederike Praus; Bartosz Krzowski; Tabea Walther; Christian Gratzke; Paweł Balsam; Arkadiusz Miernik; Philippe Fabian Pohlmann
Journal:  JMIR Cardio       Date:  2022-06-21

Review 6.  Regulatory considerations to keep pace with innovation in digital health products.

Authors:  John Torous; Ariel D Stern; Florence T Bourgeois
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2022-08-19

7.  The SMILe integrated care model in allogeneic SteM cell TransplantatIon faciLitated by eHealth: a protocol for a hybrid effectiveness-implementation randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Sabina De Geest; Sabine Valenta; Lynn Leppla; Alexandra Teynor; Janette Ribaut; Sabine Gerull; Juliane Mielke; Michael Simon; Jana Bartakova; Klaus Kaier; Jens Eckstein
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-08-20       Impact factor: 2.908

8.  A personalized mobile app for physical activity: An experimental mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Huong Ly Tong; Juan C Quiroz; Ahmet Baki Kocaballi; Kiran Ijaz; Enrico Coiera; Clara K Chow; Liliana Laranjo
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2022-07-21

9.  Contrasting the Expectations and Experiences Related to Mobile Health Use for Chronic Pain: Questionnaire Study.

Authors:  Saba Kheirinejad; Andy Alorwu; Aku Visuri; Simo Hosio
Journal:  JMIR Hum Factors       Date:  2022-09-06

10.  Health advertising on Facebook: Privacy and policy considerations.

Authors:  Andrea Downing; Eric Perakslis
Journal:  Patterns (N Y)       Date:  2022-08-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.