| Literature DB >> 34133846 |
Chao Jin1, Xiaonan Liu2, Wenyuan Zheng3, Liping Su4, Yang Liu4, Xu Guo4, Xiaoming Gu4, Hongping Li3, Bo Xu3, Gang Wang4, Jiyan Yu3, Qiong Zhang3, Dengke Bao5, Shaogui Wan6, Fei Xu7, Xiaohuan Lai7, Jiayun Liu8, Jinliang Xing4.
Abstract
Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) fragmentomics, which encompasses the measurement of cfDNA length and short nucleotide motifs at the ends of cfDNA molecules, is an emerging field for cancer diagnosis. The utilization of cfDNA fragmentomics for the diagnosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) caused by hepatitis B virus (HBV) is currently limited. In this study, we utilized whole-genome sequencing data of cfDNA in samples from patients with HCC (n = 197) and HBV (n = 187) to analyze the association of fragment size selection (< 150 bp) with tumor fraction (TF), copy number variation (CNV) alterations and the change in the proportion of 4-mer end motifs in HCC and HBV samples. Our analyses identified five typical CNV markers (i.e. loss in chr1p, chr4q and chr8p, and gain in chr1q and chr8q) in cfDNA with a cumulatively positive rate of ˜ 95% in HCC samples. Size selection (< 150 bp) significantly enhanced TF and CNV signals in HCC samples. Additionally, three 4-mer end motifs (CCCA, CCTG and CCAG) were identified as preferred end motifs in HCC samples. We identified 139 end motifs significantly associated with fragment size that showed similar patterns of associations between patients with HCC and HBV, suggesting that end motifs might be inherently coupled with fragment size by a ubiquitous mechanism. Here we conclude that CNV markers, fragment size selection and end-motif pattern in cfDNA have potential for effective detection of patients with HCC.Entities:
Keywords: circulating cell-free DNA; copy number variation; end motifs; fragment sizes; hepatocellular carcinoma; tumor fraction
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34133846 PMCID: PMC8410516 DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.13041
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Oncol ISSN: 1574-7891 Impact factor: 6.603
Detectability of CNA in plasma of HCC patients and HBV carriers. Chr, chromosome.
| Subject category | chr1p | chr1q | chr4q | chr8p | chr8q | Any of chr1p/1q/4q/8p/8q |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HCC ( | 26/63 (41.3%) | 50/63 (79.4%) | 44/63 (69.8%) | 31/63 (49.2%) | 44/63 (69.8%) | 59/63 (93.7%) |
| HCC‐TF high ( | 11/19 (57.9%) | 13/19 (68.4%) | 15/19 (78.9%) | 17/19 (89.5%) | 12/19 (63.2%) | 18/19 (94.7%) |
| HBV ( | 0/187 (0.0%) | 2/187 (1.07%) | 0/187 (0.0%) | 0/187 (0.0%) | 2/187 (1.07%) | 2/187 (1.07%) |
Fig. 1Genome‐scale overview of cfDNA CNV in 63 HCC samples with HBV infection detected by WGS. X‐axis represents 1–22 X‐chromosomes and each line in Y‐axis represents one HCC sample. CNV amplifications are presented in red and CNV deletions in blue. The darker the color is, the greater the amplitudes/deletions are.
Fig. 2A distinct difference of fragment lengths in HCC and HBV samples. (A) Fragment size density distribution of DNA fragments of 20 HCC samples with TF > 0.2 and 187 HBV samples. X‐axis represents the length of fragments and Y‐axis the proportion of fragments with the corresponding fragment size. HCC samples are indicated in blue and HBV samples in red. (B) Box plots of the mean proportions of cfDNA fragments < 150 bp in all fragment sizes from 20 HCC samples with TF > 0.2, 43 HCC samples with 0 < TF ≤ 0.2, and 187 HBV samples. The mean proportion of cfDNA fragments < 150 bp among three groups was compared using one‐tail t‐tests. Orange line represents mean and whiskers represent range.
Fig. 3cfDNA fragment selection increases TF and CNV signals. (A) The effect of selecting fragments < 150 bp on the tumor purity of HCC samples using linear least‐squares regression. The tumor purity of each sample after size selection (Y‐axis) and before size selection (X‐axis) is shown. (B) CNV profiles of one HCC sample (HCC‐1366) before (bottom) and after fragment size enrichment (top). CNV amplifications are presented in red and CNV deletions in green. The darker the color is, the greater the amplitudes/deletions are. (C) CNV profiles of 43 HCC samples with ctDNA TF between 0 and 0.2 showing the CNV signal alterations before (top) and after selecting < 150 bp fragments (bottom). (D) CNV profiles of 44 HCC samples with low proportions of ctDNA in cfDNA (TF = 0) showing the CNV signal alterations before (top) and after < 150 bp fragment selection (bottom). CNV amplifications are presented in red and CNV deletions in blue. The darker the color is, the greater the amplitudes/deletions are.
Fig. 4cfDNA end‐motif determination and the association of fragment sizes and end motifs in HCC (TF > 0, n = 63) and HBV samples (n = 187). (A) Box plot analysis of differential frequencies of six representative motifs (CCCA, CCTG, CCAG, TAAA, AAAA and TTTT) among high‐TF HCC (TF > 0.2; n = 20), low‐TF HCC (0 < TF ≤ 0.2; n = 43) and HBV groups (n = 187). The three groups were compared using one‐tail t‐tests. Orange line represents mean and whiskers represent range. *P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001. (B) Fragment size distributions of six motifs from HCC samples with TF > 0.2 (top) and HBV samples (bottom). (C) The effect of selection of fragments shorter than 150 bp on the proportion of motifs using linear least‐squares regression. The proportions of each motif in all cfDNA reads after size selection (Y‐axis) and before size selection (X‐axis) are shown. Dark blue dots represent HCC samples and orange dots HBV samples. (D) Heat map analysis of the association of fragment sizes and 70 motifs with a proportions > 0.005 from high‐TF HCC (TF > 0.2) samples. X‐axis represents the length of fragments and Y‐axis the proportion of the corresponding motif. Each matrix represents the mean proportion of reads of the corresponding end motif from all samples; the data were revised using the z‐score.
Fig. 5The inherent coupling of cfDNA fragment size and end motifs which might be associated with cfDNA cleavage process, in both HCC and HBV samples, as a ubiquitous mechanism.
Top 10 most significant (smallest P‐values) end motifs showing proportion changes in HCC and HBV samples after fragment size selection.
| Motif | Mean | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| HCC | |||
| TTCC | 0.001734 | 0.759349 | 5.50E−136 |
| GAAT | 0.005042 | 0.299973 | 3.59E−110 |
| ATGG | 0.001753 | 0.496929 | 1.24E−104 |
| GAAA | 0.007313 | 0.203002 | 1.87E−98 |
| AAAA | 0.009739 | 0.273082 | 4.14E−92 |
| TCCA | 0.005373 | 0.181188 | 1.57E−80 |
| AATG | 0.003325 | 0.272515 | 1.90E−80 |
| ATTC | 0.001841 | 0.375516 | 5.94E−77 |
| AATT | 0.002967 | 0.280476 | 8.92E−71 |
| GGAC | 0.003352 | −0.10491 | 4.27E−65 |
| HBV | |||
| GAAA | 0.00734 | 0.216998 | 8.98E−153 |
| GAAT | 0.005054 | 0.314193 | 5.12E−152 |
| TTCC | 0.001652 | 0.82927 | 7.68E−141 |
| ATGG | 0.001693 | 0.531796 | 6.93E−140 |
| AAAA | 0.009874 | 0.289954 | 7.95E−117 |
| CGTA | 0.000953 | −0.13613 | 3.05E−116 |
| TCCA | 0.005338 | 0.187821 | 3.17E−113 |
| GATT | 0.003373 | 0.228652 | 7.96E−110 |
| ATTC | 0.001849 | 0.380833 | 3.90E−107 |
| AATG | 0.003363 | 0.27518 | 5.70E−107 |