Literature DB >> 34133061

Evaluating the clinical experience of a regional in-center nocturnal hemodialysis program: The patient and staff perspective.

Katherine L Hull1,2, Niamh Quann3, Suzanne Glover2, Coral Wimbury2, Darren R Churchward1,2, Warren P Pickering2, Rob Preston2, Richard Baines2, Matthew P M Graham-Brown1,2, James O Burton1,2,4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: End-stage kidney disease causes significant morbidity, mortality, and reduced quality of life. Despite improvements in conventional hemodialysis, these problems persist. In-center nocturnal hemodialysis (INHD) has been shown to be beneficial in observational studies. This report outlines a 4-year renal network experience of INHD from the patient and frontline staff perspective.
METHODS: Staff and patients' experiences of INHD were evaluated through two work streams. Work stream one: 12 patients who chose to stop INHD and 24 patients who chose to continue with INHD completed an anonymous survey. Work stream two: one-to-one interviews with 20 patients receiving INHD and seven staff working INHD shifts were conducted. Clinical incident reporting for conventional hemodialysis and INHD from April 2014 to December 2018 was reviewed.
FINDINGS: Work stream one: Five themes were identified; facilities, time, health and well-being, sleep, and transport. A patient "starter pack" was developed and improvements to the dialysis unit were completed. Work stream two: Patient interviews demonstrated starter packs to aid sleep were well received; sleep itself was not a single reason to discontinue INHD. Staff indicated that their greatest concern was staffing levels; although staff-to-patient ratio remains unchanged, total numbers on INHD shifts were fewer, causing concern around less colleague availability for support during an emergency. SAFETY: 363 clinical incidents were reported across all dialysis shifts; for conventional hemodialysis, a larger proportion were due to medical interventions, infection control, and transport; for INHD, most incidents centered around communication with patients and relatives, delays in patient transfer, and issues with medical equipment or facilities. DISCUSSION: Patients continue with INHD due to increased social time and perceived health benefits. Patient starter packs and adjustments to the dialysis unit may enhance sleep. This experience has optimized the design of the NightLife study; a randomized controlled trial evaluated the effect of INHD on quality of life.
© 2021 The Authors. Hemodialysis International published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Hemodialysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  end-stage kidney disease; in-center nocturnal hemodialysis; quality improvement; quality of life

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34133061     DOI: 10.1111/hdi.12953

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hemodial Int        ISSN: 1492-7535            Impact factor:   1.812


  1 in total

Review 1.  Studying both patient and staff experience to investigate their perceptions and to target key interactions to improve: a scoping review.

Authors:  Marion Crubezy; Sara Corbin; Sophie Hyvert; Philippe Michel; Julie Haesebaert
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 3.006

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.