Literature DB >> 34131501

Hemangioma of the male breast: Presentation after thorn injury.

Ali Imran Alwani1, Mary R Schwartz2, Barrett C Riddle3, Richard Caplan4, Lewis L Ware5.   

Abstract

Hemangiomas of the breast are uncommon and, in males, almost always present as a palpable breast mass. Here, we report the case of a male patient who was diagnosed with a breast hemangioma following an incidental injury to his breast, which triggered symptoms that prompted clinical work-up. As this diagnosis likely would have otherwise not been made, it follows that benign breast masses in males may be underreported and underdiagnosed.
© 2021 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34131501      PMCID: PMC8171138          DOI: 10.1259/bjrcr.20200187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJR Case Rep        ISSN: 2055-7159


Introduction

Hemangiomas of the breast are rare in males, with, to the best of our knowledge, only 16 previously reported cases.[1-5] Given the rarity of this male breast lesion, exact prevalence is not known, with 1 study reporting 12 total lesions from a specimen sample of 1362 (prevalence of 0.9%), of which only 1 was from a male.[6] Most breast tumors, including hemangiomas, and other breast lesions in males present as palpable masses.[7] Here, we report the case of a male patient who did not initially have a palpable breast mass, but following a thorn stick, developed clinical symptoms and eventually was diagnosed with a hemangioma of the breast.

Clinical presentation

A 64-year-old Caucasian gentleman, with a history of coronary artery disease status post coronary artery bypass-grafting, presented with an 8-week complaint of a palpable right breast mass. He recalled being stuck by a 4-inch thorn in the right breast approximately 3 months earlier, soon after which he developed localized pruritus and irritation. These symptoms prompted him to see his primary care physician, who ordered a diagnostic breast mammogram.

Differential diagnosis

The differential diagnosis of a palpable mass in a male patient includes, but is not limited to, gynecomastia, pseudogynecomastia such as lipomastia, hemangioma, angiosarcoma, lymphangioma, fat necrosis, pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia, and reactive lymphadenopathy.[7]

Investigation/imaging/pathology findings

On mammography, a well-circumscribed round mass without associated calcifications or architectural distortion was observed in the right breast (Figures 1 and 2). Diagnostic mammogram in the CC projection showing a well-circumscribed mass in the right breast (arrow). CC, craniocaudal. Diagnostic mammogram in the ML projection showing a well-circumscribed mass in the right breast (arrow). ML, mediolateral. A right breast ultrasound showed a well-circumscribed hypoechoic mass with internal septations and echoes. There was minimal associated Doppler flow in the mass (Figure 3). Core needle biopsies of the mass were performed under ultrasound-guidance.
Figure 3.

Breast ultrasound confirming the presence of a hypoechoic, well-circumscribed mass on the right side (arrow), with minimal Doppler flow.

Breast ultrasound confirming the presence of a hypoechoic, well-circumscribed mass on the right side (arrow), with minimal Doppler flow. The biopsies showed a hemangioma with predominant features of a cavernous hemangioma. There were variably sized dilated thin-walled vessels, as well as focal feeder muscular veins. No atypia or increased mitotic activity was seen. There were a few thrombosed vascular spaces perhaps related to the recent injury (Figures 4–5). Photomicrograph of the core-needle biopsy showing a hemangioma with multiple dilated blood-filled spaces (H and E, original magnification, x100). Photomicrograph of the core-needle biopsy of the hemangioma showing an organizing thrombus in a space on the far right and a fibrin thrombus in a vascular space bottom right (H and E, original magnification, x100).

Outcome, follow-up, and discussion

The patient was referred for surgical consultation. While some feel that hemangiomas may carry a potential for malignant transformation to angiosarcoma, others feel that “malignant-transformed” lesions were already angiosarcomas to start with, albeit initially underdiagnosed. An example of this is the case reported by Frey et al, where the diagnosis of angiosarcoma was made only after surgical excision of a breast mass initially diagnosed as a hemangioma.[8] To date, there is no definitive evidence of a cavernous hemangioma undergoing malignant transformation to an angiosarcoma.[9] A retrospective study by Mesurolle et al, and further highlighted by Yoga et al, concluded that it is reasonable to spare patients surgical excision of benign hemangiomas of the breast with a strong radiographic–pathologic correlation and a clearly benign diagnosis on biopsy.[7,10] The patient did not undergo surgery and close follow-up was recommended. Given the possibility that the patient might not have noticed a breast mass in the absence of the preceding thorn prick, it would follow that some breast hemangiomas, along with other benign breast lesions, may be asymptomatic and non-palpable, and thus underreported and underdiagnosed in males.

Conclusion

Hemangiomas of the breast are rare in males, and almost always present as a palpable mass. However, the case presented here of a patient who might not have been diagnosed with a breast hemangioma without the prior incidental injury suggests that the prevalence of male breast hemangiomas and other benign lesions could be higher than previously thought. Most vascular tumors of the breast are benign, but in some instances, it may be difficult to differentiate a benign vascular tumor from a low-grade malignant vascular tumor in a small biopsy. If the benign characteristics of a hemangioma of the breast are well-supported by biopsy findings and radiographic–pathologic correlation, the patient could be spared surgical resection with close mammographic surveillance and follow-up. Breast masses in males may not always present as a palpable mass, especially in the absence of other symptoms, and may be discovered incidentally. The prevalence of breast masses in males may be underreported due to the asymptomatic nature of some lesions. Vascular tumors of the breast in males are rare, and include both malignant and benign masses, such as angiosarcoma and hemangioma, respectively. Hemangiomas of the breast with a strong radiologic–pathologic correlation and unequivocal benign biopsy findings do not require surgical excision. Mandatory follow-up is necessary if the decision is taken to spare surgery for the patient.
  10 in total

1.  A cavernous haemangioma of breast in male: radiological-pathological correlation.

Authors:  C Carreira; C Romero; R Rodriguez; J Martín de Francisco; M Urbasos; J Pinto
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Mammographic and sonographic characteristics of a cavernous hemangioma in a male patient.

Authors:  Rebecca Leddy; Abbie Cluver
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.153

3.  Huge cavernous hemangioma arising in a male breast.

Authors:  Satoki Kinoshita; Shigeya Kyoda; Kazuto Tsuboi; Kyonsu Son; Teruyuki Usuba; Yuichi Nakasato; Hideyuki Kashiwagi; Kazumasa Komine; Meisei Takeishi; Shuji Sato; Hiroshi Takeyama; Ken Uchida; Yojii Yamazaki; Goi Sakamoto
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.239

4.  Cavernous hemangioma of the male breast.

Authors:  Ricardo Laier Franco; Natália Guimarães de Moraes Schenka; André Almeida Schenka; Marcelo Alvarenga
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.431

5.  Hemangiomas of the breast with atypical histological features. Further analysis of histological subtypes confirming their benign character.

Authors:  S A Hoda; M L Cranor; P P Rosen
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 6.394

6.  Angiosarcoma of the breast masquerading as hemangioma: exploring clinical and pathological diagnostic challenges.

Authors:  Jordan D Frey; Pascale G Levine; Farbod Darvishian; Richard L Shapiro
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2015-03-16

Review 7.  A large benign vascular neoplasm of the male breast. A case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  A Kondi-Pafitis; E Kairi-Vassilatou; D Grapsa; I Kalkounou; G Vassilikostas; I Psichogios
Journal:  Eur J Gynaecol Oncol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 0.196

8.  Sonographic and mammographic appearances of breast hemangioma.

Authors:  Benoît Mesurolle; Vitaly Sygal; Lucie Lalonde; André Lisbona; Michel-Pierre Dufresne; Jean H Gagnon; Ellen Kao
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Rare non-epithelial primary breast neoplasms: a ten-year experience at a Greek University Hospital.

Authors:  A Kondi-Pafiti; D Dellaportas; D Myoteri; A Tsagkas; E Ntakomyti; E Kairi-Vasilatou
Journal:  J BUON       Date:  2013 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.533

Review 10.  Hemangioma of a Male Breast: Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Arthy Yoga; Kirill A Lyapichev; Donghwa Baek; Carmen R Gomez-Fernandez
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2018-11-30
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.