Connor O'Rielly 1 , Joshua Ng-Kamstra 2 , Ania Kania-Richmond 3 , Joseph Dort 4 , Jonathan White 5 , Jill Robert 6 , Mary Brindle 7 , Khara Sauro 8 Show Affiliations »
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To understand how surgical services have been reorganised during and following public health emergencies, particularly the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the consequences for patients, healthcare providers and healthcare systems. DESIGN: A rapid scoping review. SETTING: We searched the MEDLINE, Embase and grey literature sources for documents and press releases from governments and surgical organisations or associations. PARTICIPANTS: Studies examining surgical service delivery during public health emergencies including COVID-19, and the impact on patients, providers and healthcare systems were included. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were strategies implemented for the reorganisation of surgical services. Secondary were the impacts of reorganisation and resuming surgical services, such as: adverse events (including morbidity and mortality), primary care and emergency department visits, length of hospital and ICU stay, and changes to surgical waitlists. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-two studies were included in this review; 111 described reorganisation of surgical services, 55 described the consequences of reorganising surgical services; and 6 reported actions taken to rebuild surgical capacity in public health emergencies. Reorganisations of surgical services were grouped under six domains: case selection/triage, personal protective equipment (PPE) regulations and practice, workforce composition and deployment, outpatient and inpatient patient care, resident and fellow education, and the hospital or clinical environment. Service reorganisations led to large reductions in non-urgent surgical volumes, increases in surgical wait times and impacted medical training (ie, reduced case involvement) and patient outcomes (eg, increases in pain). Strategies for rebuilding surgical capacity were scarce but focused on the availability of staff, PPE and patient readiness for surgery as key factors to consider before resuming services. CONCLUSIONS: Reorganisation of surgical services in response to public health emergencies appears to be context dependent and has far-reaching consequences that must be better understood in order to optimise future health system responses to public health emergencies. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
OBJECTIVES: To understand how surgical services have been reorganised during and following public health emergencies, particularly the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the consequences for patients , healthcare providers and healthcare systems. DESIGN: A rapid scoping review. SETTING: We searched the MEDLINE, Embase and grey literature sources for documents and press releases from governments and surgical organisations or associations. PARTICIPANTS : Studies examining surgical service delivery during public health emergencies including COVID-19 , and the impact on patients , providers and healthcare systems were included. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were strategies implemented for the reorganisation of surgical services. Secondary were the impacts of reorganisation and resuming surgical services, such as: adverse events (including morbidity and mortality ), primary care and emergency department visits, length of hospital and ICU stay, and changes to surgical waitlists. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-two studies were included in this review; 111 described reorganisation of surgical services, 55 described the consequences of reorganising surgical services; and 6 reported actions taken to rebuild surgical capacity in public health emergencies. Reorganisations of surgical services were grouped under six domains: case selection/triage, personal protective equipment (PPE) regulations and practice, workforce composition and deployment, outpatient and inpatient patient care, resident and fellow education, and the hospital or clinical environment. Service reorganisations led to large reductions in non-urgent surgical volumes, increases in surgical wait times and impacted medical training (ie, reduced case involvement) and patient outcomes (eg, increases in pain ). Strategies for rebuilding surgical capacity were scarce but focused on the availability of staff, PPE and patient readiness for surgery as key factors to consider before resuming services. CONCLUSIONS: Reorganisation of surgical services in response to public health emergencies appears to be context dependent and has far-reaching consequences that must be better understood in order to optimise future health system responses to public health emergencies. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Entities: Disease
Gene
Species
Keywords:
health services administration & management; public health; surgery
Year: 2021
PMID： 34130956 DOI： 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043966
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Open ISSN： 2044-6055 Impact factor: 2.692