Jia Guo1, Yuan Liu2. 1. Department of Gastroenterology, Sunshine Union Hospital, Weifang, Shandong, China. 2. Department of Pharmacy, the Second People's Hospital of Huai'an City, Huaian, Jiangsu, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Colon cancer has high morbidity and mortality rates, and proliferation, invasion and migration play an important role in colon cancer progression. Here, the effects of inhibin subunit beta A (INHBA) on cell proliferation, invasion and migration were investigated. METHODS: The UALCAN database was used to assess INHBA expression in colon cancer tissues and predict the survival of patients with high and low INHBA expression. The relevant proteins were detected by RT-qPCR and western blot. Cell transfection was performed to overexpress or inhibit INHBA and versican (VCAN). The high correlation between INHBA and VCAN found through LinkedOmics and StarBase databases was verified by immunoprecipitation assays. Cell proliferation was detected by cell counting kit-8 and colony formation assays. Wound healing and Transwell assays were used to assess migration and invasion. RESULTS: INHBA expression was upregulated in colon cancer tissues and cells. INHBA inhibition impaired the proliferation, migration and invasion of these cells. In addition, we confirmed the correlation between INHBA and VCAN in colon cancer cells. Finally, we found that INHBA interference inhibited the aggressive behavior of colon cancer cells by downregulating VCAN. CONCLUSION: INHBA promotes the proliferation, migration and invasion of colon cancer cells through the upregulation of VCAN.
OBJECTIVE: Colon cancer has high morbidity and mortality rates, and proliferation, invasion and migration play an important role in colon cancer progression. Here, the effects of inhibin subunit beta A (INHBA) on cell proliferation, invasion and migration were investigated. METHODS: The UALCAN database was used to assess INHBA expression in colon cancer tissues and predict the survival of patients with high and low INHBA expression. The relevant proteins were detected by RT-qPCR and western blot. Cell transfection was performed to overexpress or inhibit INHBA and versican (VCAN). The high correlation between INHBA and VCAN found through LinkedOmics and StarBase databases was verified by immunoprecipitation assays. Cell proliferation was detected by cell counting kit-8 and colony formation assays. Wound healing and Transwell assays were used to assess migration and invasion. RESULTS: INHBA expression was upregulated in colon cancer tissues and cells. INHBA inhibition impaired the proliferation, migration and invasion of these cells. In addition, we confirmed the correlation between INHBA and VCAN in colon cancer cells. Finally, we found that INHBA interference inhibited the aggressive behavior of colon cancer cells by downregulating VCAN. CONCLUSION: INHBA promotes the proliferation, migration and invasion of colon cancer cells through the upregulation of VCAN.
Colon cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors, and it frequently occurs at
the junction of the rectum and the sigmoid colon in the digestive system.
The clinical mortality and morbidity of colon cancer remain high, with 1.2
million new colon cancer cases each year and about 600,000 deaths due to colon cancer.
Therefore, an in-depth understanding of the mechanisms underlying the
occurrence and development of colon cancer is of great significance to improve the
prognosis of patients.INHBA is a member of the transforming growth factor (TGF)-β superfamily and plays an
important role in several cancers. A previous study reported that the abnormal
methylation and differential expression of INHBA in gastric cancer were related to
the prognosis of patients.
Furthermore, INHBA regulates the expression of IL13Ralpha2 to promote the
metastasis of breast cancer cells,
and targeting the INHBA/TGF-β axis inhibits the formation and growth of
prostate tumors.
These results indicate that INHBA is related to the occurrence, development
and prognosis of various cancers. Previous studies have also identified INHBA as a
prognostic predictor in patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma and colon
cancer.[6,7]
Furthermore, miR-6785-5p targets INHBA to regulate the occurrence and progression of
gastric cancer.
Therefore, we hypothesized that INHBA plays a certain role in regulating the
biological activities of colon cancer cells.Our analysis of the LinkedOmics database revealed that INHBA was positively
correlated with most genes in colon cancer and highly correlated with versican
(VCAN). VCAN is a large aggregated chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan involved in cell
adhesion, proliferation, migration, angiogenesis and tissue morphogenesis and
maintenance.[9-12] VCAN is a potential
prognostic biomarker for colon cancer recurrence and an important regulator of colon
cancer cell proliferation and migration.[13,14] However, the specific
mechanisms by which VCNA mediates the proliferation, invasion and migration of colon
cancer cells have not been reported. Therefore, we aimed to study the roles and
mechanisms of INHBA in regulating the aggressive behavior of colon cancer cells to
provide a theoretical basis for the treatment of colon cancer.
Materials and methods
Cell culture
The normal colonic mucosa cell line NCM460 and colon cancer cell lines CaCo2,
SW1116, SW480, HCT-116 and LoVo were purchased from the American Type Culture
Collection (Manassas, VA, USA). Cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium
supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 100 U/mL of penicillin and
streptomycin (all from Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) under
standard culture conditions in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 at
37°C. The study protocol did not need approval by an ethics committee or
institutional review board because our article does not include animal or human
experiments.
Database selection
We used the UALCAN database (http://ualcan.path.uab.edu/) to assess the expression of INHBA
in normal intestinal tissues and colon cancer tissues and the survival of
patients with colon cancer. The LinkedOmics (http://linkedomics.org/login.php) and StarBase (http://starbase.sysu.edu.cn/) databases were used to predict the
genes associated with INHBA. Informed consent was not applicable because the
patient data were from publicly available databases.
Western blot
Radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer (Beyotime Technology, Jiangsu, China) was
used for protein extraction. Protein concentration was measured using a BCA
protein assay kit (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Haimen, China). Next,
40 µg of protein were separated by sodium dodecyl-sulfate polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) (12.5%) and transferred onto polyvinylidene
difluoride membranes, which were subsequently blocked with 5% nonfat milk and
incubated with relevant primary antibodies at 4°C overnight. Horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies were used to detect primary
antibodies. The ECL detection system (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) was used to
image protein bands, and a semiquantitative analysis was conducted using ImageJ
1.8.0 software (https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/). Primary antibodies included
glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH, 1:1000, ab8226, Abcam,
Cambridge, MA, USA), anti‐INHBA (1:1000, ab128958, Abcam), anti-proliferating
cell nuclear antigen (PCNA, 1:1000, ab92552, Abcam), anti-Ki67 (1:1000, ab16667,
Abcam), anti-matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP2, 1:1000, ab92536, Abcam),
anti-MMP9 (1:1000, ab76003, Abcam) and anti-VCAN (1:1000, ab177480, Abcam).
Total RNA was extracted from cultured cells with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen Inc.,
Carlsbad, CA, USA) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. The cDNA
was synthesized by reverse transcription with the M-MLV Reverse Transcriptase
kit (Invitrogen, Inc.). RT-qPCR was performed with the SYBR Premix Ex Taq II
(Takara, Dalian, China) and an ABI 7500 Real-Time PCR System (Applied
Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) in accordance with the manufacturer’s
protocol. The target gene expression level was normalized to GAPDH. Primer
sequences were as follows: INHBA forward: 5ʹ-CCTCGGAGATCATCACGTTT-3ʹ and
reverse: 5ʹ-CCCTTTAAGCCCACTTCCTC-3ʹ; PCNA forward: 5ʹ-CTGAAGCCGAAACCAGCTAGACT-3ʹ
and reverse: 5ʹ-TCGTTGATGAGGTCCTTGAGTGC-3ʹ; Ki67 forward:
5ʹ-AATTCAGACTCCATGTGCCTGAG-3ʹ and reverse: 5ʹ-CTTGACACACACATTGTCCTCAGC-3ʹ; VCAN
forward: 5ʹ-CAAACCCTGCCTCAACGGAGG-3ʹ and reverse:
5ʹ-CCTTCAGCAGCATCCCATGTGCGT-3ʹ; and GAPDH forward: 5ʹ-TGTTGCCATCAATGACCCC-3ʹ and
reverse: 5ʹ-CTCCACGACGTACTCAGC-3ʹ. GAPDH was included as an internal control,
and the 2−ΔΔCq method was used for gene expression analysis.
Cell transfection
Small interfering RNA (si)-INHBA-1, si-INHBA-2, overexpression VCAN (Ov-VCAN) and
negative control (NC) plasmids at a concentration of 20 nM were purchased from
Shanghai GenePharma Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). siRNA and plasmids were
transfected into cells using Lipofectamine RNAi max (Invitrogen Inc., 13778150)
and Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen Inc., L3000015), respectively, following the
manufacturer’s instructions. Ov-VCAN or empty vector (Ov-NC) were transfected
into cells with Lipofectamine® 2000 (Invitrogen Inc.) in accordance with the
manufacturer’s protocol. After transfection for 48 hours at 37°C with 5%
CO2, the transfection efficiency was measured via RT-qPCR
analysis.
Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK8) assay
Cell proliferation was examined using the CCK-8 Cell Counting Kit (Nanjing Vazyme
Biotech Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China) in accordance with the manufacturer’s
instructions. Briefly, HCT116 cells were grown in a 96-well plate for 24 hours,
transfected and then cultured in normal medium. To measure cell proliferation at
0, 24, 48 or 72 hours after transfection, 10 µl of CCK-8 were added to each
well, and cells were further incubated for 3 hours. Absorbance at 450 nm was
measured using a microplate reader (VersaMax, San Francisco, CA, USA).
Colony formation assay
Cells were seeded into a six‐well plate at a density of 1 × 104
cells/well in RPMI 1640 containing 10% FBS for 12 hours. After treatment, cells
were then re‐suspended in RPMI 1640 containing 10% FBS and cultured in 5%
CO2 at 37°C for 15 days to allow colony formation. The plate was
washed with cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The colonies were fixed with
4% polyformaldehyde at room temperature and stained with 1% crystal violet for
30 minutes at room temperature. The colonies with more than 100 cells were
counted using a microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany).
Wound healing assay
The cells were plated at a density of 1 × 105 cells/well in six-well
culture plates. When the cells grew to 95% confluence, the cell monolayers were
scraped with a sterile pipette tip, and then cells were washed with PBS several
times to remove cell debris, followed by incubation with serum-free medium for
24 hours. Cells migrated to close the wound, representing in
vitro healing. Wound healing was photographed using an inverted
microscope and assessed by determining the rate of closure with the following
formula: wound healing rate = [(the wound width at 0 hours – the wound width
at 24 hours)/0-hour wound width] × 100%.
Transwell invasion assay
Cells (2 × 105 cells/well) were re-suspended in serum-free medium and
seeded on the top side of filters with an 8-µm pore size (Millipore), and medium
containing 10% FBS was added to the bottom side. Transwell invasion assays were
performed following the manufacturer’s instructions. The images were taken using
an inverted microscope.
Co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP)
Cells were harvested, and an appropriate volume of lysis buffer was added to each
sample. The cells were lysed on ice (4°C) for 30 minutes, after which the
supernatants were harvested by centrifugation for 30 minutes at
300 × g. A small amount of each lysate was retained for
western blot analysis, and the remainder was added to a tube containing 1 µg of
the corresponding antibody. The samples were incubated overnight at 4°C. Next,
10 µL protein A agarose beads washed with lysate (Thermo Fisher Scientific) were
added to the cell lysates and slowly shaken at 4°C for 2 to 4 hours to stimulate
antibody/bead coupling. Following immunoprecipitation, the samples were
centrifuged at 350 × g (4°C) for 30 minutes, and the
supernatant was discarded. The samples were then washed three to four times with
1 mL buffer solution. Finally, 15 µL SDS (2X) was added, and the samples were
boiled for 5 minutes prior to western blot analysis.
Statistical analysis
The data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by
Tukey’s test (GraphPad Prism software for Windows, v. 5.01, La Jolla, CA, USA).
The prognostic value of INHBA was explored by Kaplan–Meier analysis. A value of
P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
INHBA expression in colon cancer cells
We analyzed the expression of INHBA in normal intestinal tissues (n = 41) and
colon cancer tissues (n = 286) using the UALCAN database, and the results showed
that the expression of INHBA was significantly increased in colon cancer tissues
compared with normal intestinal tissues (Figure 1a). Patients with colon cancer
who showed higher INHBA expression had a shorter overall survival time (Figure 1b). Subsequently,
RT-qPCR (Figure 1c) and
western blot (Figure
1d) were used to detect the expression of INHBA in normal colon mucosa
cells and colon cancer cells. We found that the expression of INHBA was
significantly increased in colon cancer cell lines, with HCT116 cells exhibiting
the highest expression. Therefore, HCT116 cells were selected for subsequent
studies.
Figure 1.
INHBA expression in colon cancer cells. The UALCAN database was used to
assess INHBA expression levels in normal intestinal tissues (n = 41) and
colon cancer tissues (n = 286) (a) and analyze the survival of patients
with high (n = 70) and low/medium expression (n = 209) (b). (c) RT-qPCR
detected the mRNA expression of INHBA in colon cancer cell lines. (d)
Western blot detected the protein expression of INHBA. GAPDH was used as
an internal control. ***P < 0.001.
INHBA expression in colon cancer cells. The UALCAN database was used to
assess INHBA expression levels in normal intestinal tissues (n = 41) and
colon cancer tissues (n = 286) (a) and analyze the survival of patients
with high (n = 70) and low/medium expression (n = 209) (b). (c) RT-qPCR
detected the mRNA expression of INHBA in colon cancer cell lines. (d)
Western blot detected the protein expression of INHBA. GAPDH was used as
an internal control. ***P < 0.001.COAD, colorectal adenocarcinoma; TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas; INHBA,
inhibin subunit beta A; RT-qPCR, quantitative reverse
transcription-polymerase chain reaction; GAPDH, glycerol 3-phosphate
dehydrogenase.
INHBA interference inhibits the proliferation of colon cancer cells
siRNA transfection was used to interfere with the expression of INHBA. RT-qPCR
(Figure 2a) and
western blot (Figure
2b) were used to detect the cellular expression of INHBA. Because
si-INHBA-1 clearly interfered with INHBA expression, it was selected for
subsequent experiments. We then measured cell proliferation in cells transfected
with si-INHBA-1. The CCK-8 results showed that cell proliferation was
significantly decreased in the si-INHBA group compared with the si-NC group
(P < 0.05) (Figure
2c). Ki67 and PCNA are cell proliferation markers.
Next, we used RT-qPCR and western blot to detect the expression of Ki67
and PCNA. Compared with the si-NC group, the expression levels of PCNA and Ki67
in the si-INHBA group were significantly decreased (P < 0.001) (Figure 2d and e). In
addition, we conducted colony formation assays to detect cell proliferation, and
the results were consistent with the results of CCK-8 experiments (Figure 2f). These results
indicated that INHBA knockdown significantly inhibited the proliferation of
colon cancer cells.
Figure 2.
INHBA interference inhibited the proliferation of colon cancer cells. (a)
RT-qPCR detected the mRNA expression of INHBA after cell transfection.
(b) Western blot detected the protein expression of INHBA after cell
transfection. GAPDH was used as an internal control. (c) CCK-8 assay
detected cell viability. (d) Western blot detected the protein
expression of PCNA and Ki67. (e) RT-qPCR detected the mRNA expression of
PCNA and Ki67. (f) Colony formation assay detected cell proliferation.
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
INHBA interference inhibited the proliferation of colon cancer cells. (a)
RT-qPCR detected the mRNA expression of INHBA after cell transfection.
(b) Western blot detected the protein expression of INHBA after cell
transfection. GAPDH was used as an internal control. (c) CCK-8 assay
detected cell viability. (d) Western blot detected the protein
expression of PCNA and Ki67. (e) RT-qPCR detected the mRNA expression of
PCNA and Ki67. (f) Colony formation assay detected cell proliferation.
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.INHBA, inhibin subunit beta A; RT-qPCR, quantitative reverse
transcription-polymerase chain reaction; PCNA, proliferating cell
nuclear antigen; CCK-8, cell counting kit-8; GAPDH, glycerol 3-phosphate
dehydrogenase; NC, negative control.
INHBA interference inhibits the migration and invasion of colon cancer
cells
Next, we used wound healing and Transwell assays to detect cell migration and
invasion. We found that the inhibition of INHBA expression significantly reduced
the migratory and invasion abilities of colon cancer cells (P < 0.001) (Figure 3a). MMP2 and MMP9
are markers of tumor invasion and migration.
Western blot was used to detect the expression of MMP2 and MMP9, and we
found that the MMP2 and MMP9 levels in the si-INHBA group were significantly
decreased compared with the si-NC group (P < 0.01). These results indicated
that INHBA interference inhibited the migration and invasion of colon cancer
cells.
Figure 3.
INHBA interference inhibited the migration and invasion of colon cancer
cells. (a) Wound healing and Transwell assays detected cell migration
and invasion. (b) Western blot detected the protein expression of MMP2
and MMP9. GAPDH was used as an internal control. **P < 0.01 and
***P < 0.001.
INHBA interference inhibited the migration and invasion of colon cancer
cells. (a) Wound healing and Transwell assays detected cell migration
and invasion. (b) Western blot detected the protein expression of MMP2
and MMP9. GAPDH was used as an internal control. **P < 0.01 and
***P < 0.001.INHBA, inhibin subunit beta A; MMP, matrix metalloproteinase; GAPDH,
glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase; NC, negative control.
INHBA and VCAN expression are correlated in colon cancer cells
The LinkedOmics database predicted a correlation between INHBA and VCAN. The
volcano plot in Figure
4a shows the genes with positive and negative correlations with
INHBA. The top 50 genes with significant positive and negative correlations with
INHBA were shown in the heat map (Figure 4b). The heat map demonstrates a
diverse influence of INHBA on the transcriptome in colon cancer. VCAN showed the
strongest positive correlation with INHBA (Figure 4c). Subsequently, their
correlation was verified using the StarBase database (Figure 4d). Then, the cellular
expression of VCAN was detected by RT-qPCR (Figure 5a) and western blot (Figure 5b), which
revealed significantly increased expression in HCT-116 cells compared with
normal colonic mucosa cells (P < 0.01). Subsequently, the interaction between
VCAN and INHBA was verified by co-IP experiments (Figure 5c). Together, these experiments
show that INHBA and VCAN expression are correlated in colon cancer cells.
Figure 4.
Bioinformatics analysis of the relationship between INHBA and VCAN. (a
and b) The LinkedOmics database predicted a correlation between INHBA
and VCAN. (c and d) The correlation between INHBA and VCAN was verified
using the StarBase database.
INHBA and VCAN expression are correlated in colon cancer cells. (a)
RT-qPCR detected the mRNA expression of VCAN. (b) Western blot detected
the protein expression of VCAN. GAPDH was used as an internal control.
(c) Co-IP assays detected the interaction between INHBA and VCAN.
**P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001.
Bioinformatics analysis of the relationship between INHBA and VCAN. (a
and b) The LinkedOmics database predicted a correlation between INHBA
and VCAN. (c and d) The correlation between INHBA and VCAN was verified
using the StarBase database.COAD, colorectal adenocarcinoma; INHBA, inhibin subunit beta A; VCAN,
versican.INHBA and VCAN expression are correlated in colon cancer cells. (a)
RT-qPCR detected the mRNA expression of VCAN. (b) Western blot detected
the protein expression of VCAN. GAPDH was used as an internal control.
(c) Co-IP assays detected the interaction between INHBA and VCAN.
**P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001.INHBA, inhibin subunit beta A; VCAN, versican; RT-qPCR, quantitative
reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction; Co-IP,
co-immunoprecipitation; GAPDH, glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase.
INHBA interference inhibits the proliferation of colon cancer cells through
VCAN
VCAN-overexpressing cells were constructed using cell transfection, and the
transfection efficiency was determined by RT-qPCR and western blot (Figure 6a and b). The
cells were divided into the following groups: control (untransfected), si-NC,
si-INHBA, si-INHBA+OV-NC and si-INHBA+OV-VCAN. The CCK-8 results showed that the
cell survival rate in the si-INHBA+OV-VCAN group was significantly increased
compared with the si-INHBA+OV-NC group (P < 0.001) (Figure 6c). The expression levels of
proliferation-related genes and proteins were detected by RT-qPCR and western
blot. The results showed that the expression levels of PCNA and Ki67 in the
si-INHBA+OV-VCAN group were significantly increased compared with the
si-INHBA+OV-NC group (P < 0.01) (Figure 6d and e). The results of the
clonal formation experiments were consistent with those of the CCK-8 experiment
(Figure 6f).
Figure 6.
INHBA interference inhibited the proliferation of colon cancer cells
through VCAN. (a) RT-qPCR assays detected the mRNA expression of VCAN.
(b) Western blot detected the protein expression of VCAN. GAPDH was used
as an internal control. (c) CCK-8 assays detected cell viability. (d)
Western blot detected the protein expression of PCNA and Ki67. (e)
RT-qPCR detected the mRNA expression of PCNA and Ki67. (f) Colony
formation assay detected cell proliferation. *P < 0.05,
**P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
INHBA interference inhibited the proliferation of colon cancer cells
through VCAN. (a) RT-qPCR assays detected the mRNA expression of VCAN.
(b) Western blot detected the protein expression of VCAN. GAPDH was used
as an internal control. (c) CCK-8 assays detected cell viability. (d)
Western blot detected the protein expression of PCNA and Ki67. (e)
RT-qPCR detected the mRNA expression of PCNA and Ki67. (f) Colony
formation assay detected cell proliferation. *P < 0.05,
**P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.INHBA, inhibin subunit beta A; VCAN, versican; Ov, overexpression; NC,
negative control; RT-qPCR, quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase
chain reaction; CCK-8, cell counting kit-8; PCNA, proliferating cell
nuclear antigen; GAPDH, glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase.
INHBA interference inhibits the migration and invasion of colon cancer cells
through VCAN
Next, we examined migration and invasion in VCAN-overexpressing cells. The
results showed that the cell migration and invasion abilities of the
si-INHBA+OV-VCAN group were significantly increased compared with the
si-INHBA+OV-NC group (P < 0.01) (Figure 7a and b), which was accompanied
by increased protein expression of MMP2 and MMP9 (Figure 7c). These results indicated that
the inhibitory effects of INHBA interference on the migration and invasion of
colon cancer cells are mediated through VCAN.
Figure 7.
INHBA interference inhibited the migration and invasion of colon cancer
cells through VCAN. (a) Wound healing and Transwell experiments detected
cell migration and invasion. (b) Statistical analysis of cell migration
and invasion. (c) Western blot detected the protein expression of MMP2
and MMP9. GAPDH was used as an internal control. **P < 0.01 and
***P < 0.001.
INHBA interference inhibited the migration and invasion of colon cancer
cells through VCAN. (a) Wound healing and Transwell experiments detected
cell migration and invasion. (b) Statistical analysis of cell migration
and invasion. (c) Western blot detected the protein expression of MMP2
and MMP9. GAPDH was used as an internal control. **P < 0.01 and
***P < 0.001.INHBA, inhibin subunit beta A; VCAN, versican; MMP, matrix
metalloproteinase; Ov, overexpression; NC, negative control; GAPDH,
glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase.
Discussion
According to epidemiological data, the incidence of colon cancer is increasing, and
the onset can occur at any age, with the highest incidence observed in the age group
of 40 to 50 years old.
The incidence and mortality of colon cancer are high, and it poses a
significant risk to people’s health.Through a literature review, we found that INHBA is abnormally expressed in colon
cancer, and its expression can be used as a prognostic predictor, suggesting that it
plays a key role in the occurrence and development of colon cancer.
In this paper, we determined that INHBA was abnormally elevated in patients
with colon cancer and negatively correlated with the overall survival rate of these
patients. At the cellular level, we also confirmed that INHBA was aberrantly
expressed in different colon cancer cell lines, including LoVo, CaCo2, SW1116, SW480
and HTC-116. Our experimental results were consistent with the results of
bioinformatics analysis. However, the specific role and mechanisms of INHBA in
colorectal cancer have not yet been reported.The proliferation, invasion and migration of tumor cells play an important role in
the occurrence and development of cancer.
Chen et al.
showed that silencing the expression of INHBA inhibited the migration and
invasion of gastric cancer cells. Therefore, we speculated that INHBA has a certain
regulatory effect on the proliferation, invasion and migration of colon cancer
cells. We found that the proliferation, invasion and migration of colon cancer cells
were significantly decreased after interfering with INHBA expression, suggesting
that the increased expression of INHBA in colon cancer cells enhances their
tumor-promoting abilities. In addition, our results provide evidence for the
potential use of INHBA as a new biomarker for molecular diagnosis and target for
drug therapy in colon cancer.We found a high correlation between INHBA and VCAN expression in colon cancer through
LinkedOmics and StarBase database analysis. We also confirmed the interaction
between VCAN and INHBA using co-IP assays. These results suggest that INHBA
transcriptionally regulates the expression of VCAN. VCAN plays an important role in
the occurrence and development of cancer. Zhang et al.
found that the inhibition of VCAN impaired the migratory activity of breast
cancer cells. Additionally, VCAN expression is abnormally elevated in gastric
cancer, and VCAN knockdown inhibits the proliferation, invasion and migration of
gastric cancer cells.
In our study, we found that the expression of VCAN was significantly
increased in colon cancer cells. A previous study reported that VCAN is a potential
prognostic biomarker for colon cancer recurrence and plays an important regulatory
role in the proliferation and migration of colon cancer cells.
Therefore, we speculated that INHBA might influence the aggressive behavior
of colon cancer cells through the regulation of VCAN. To address this question, we
overexpressed VCAN in cells with inhibited INHBA expression, and we found that VCAN
overexpression reversed the inhibitory effects of INHBA on the proliferation,
invasion and migration of colon cancer cells. Therefore, we concluded that
interfering with the expression of INHBA impairs the proliferation, invasion and
migration of colon cancer cells by inhibiting the expression of VCAN.In future studies, we will verify our results in vivo using animal
models. Based on the conclusion of this article, we aim to develop targeted drugs
for the treatment of colon cancer. Overall, our study confirmed that INHBA
interference decreases the proliferation, invasion and migration of colon cancer
cells, and this effect may be mediated through the inhibition of VCAN expression.
Our study provides a theoretical basis for molecular diagnosis and targeted therapy
in colon cancer.
Authors: Mohamed Salem; Jacob A O'Brien; Stefanie Bernaudo; Heba Shawer; Gang Ye; Jelena Brkić; Asma Amleh; Barbara C Vanderhyden; Basel Refky; Burton B Yang; Sergey N Krylov; Chun Peng Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2018-05-10 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Carmela Ricciardelli; Andrew J Sakko; Miranda P Ween; Darryl L Russell; David J Horsfall Journal: Cancer Metastasis Rev Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 9.264