Literature DB >> 34129170

Nickel Hypersensitivity to Atrial Septal Occluders: Smoke Without Fire?

Anastasios Apostolos1, Maria Drakopoulou1, Stamatios Gregoriou2, Andreas Synetos1, George Trantalis1, Georgios Tsivgoulis3, Spyridon Deftereos4, Konstantinos Tsioufis1, Konstantinos Toutouzas5.   

Abstract

Nickel is one of the most common contact allergens worldwide; it is used as the main component of the devices used for atrial septal defects (ASDs) and patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure. Developing nickel hypersensitivity after PFO/ASD occlusion is significantly rarer described in medical literature than typical nickel contact sensitization. The exact pathophysiological mechanism of this "device syndrome" remains unknown, and many question the real incidence or even the existence of this clinical entity. Nevertheless, it has been associated with a wide spectrum of symptoms, including chest pain, migraines, palpitation, and dyspnea. Skin patch tests are the first-line approach to diagnose nickel hypersensitivity. However, diagnostic criteria for the device syndrome have not been developed, and diagnosis in reported cases is established by a process of elimination. Management-drug therapy (corticosteroids, clopidogrel, etc.) or even surgical explantation in severe cases-of patients developing such clinical manifestations after percutaneous PFO/ASD occlusion is empirical. Undoubtedly, endocardiac device-related nickel hypersensitivity requires more focused research to discover the underlying mechanism as well as to develop reliable prognostic tests for detecting high-risk patients and preventing severe nickel hypersensitivity reactions.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrial septal occluders; Nickel allergy; Nickel hypersensitivity; Review

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34129170     DOI: 10.1007/s12016-021-08867-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol        ISSN: 1080-0549            Impact factor:   8.667


  49 in total

Review 1.  Contact dermatitis in older adults: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Amy V Prakash; Mark D P Davis
Journal:  Am J Clin Dermatol       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 7.403

Review 2.  Prevalence of nickel allergy in Europe following the EU Nickel Directive - a review.

Authors:  Malin G Ahlström; Jacob P Thyssen; Torkil Menné; Jeanne D Johansen
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 3.  Amplatzer patent foramen ovale occluder: safety and efficacy.

Authors:  Raouf Madhkour; Andreas Wahl; Fabien Praz; Bernhard Meier
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 3.166

Review 4.  The EU Nickel Directive revisited--future steps towards better protection against nickel allergy.

Authors:  Jacob P Thyssen; Wolfgang Uter; John McFadden; Torkil Menné; Radoslaw Spiewak; Martine Vigan; Ana Gimenez-Arnau; Carola Lidén
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 5.  Nickel allergy and allergic contact dermatitis: A clinical review of immunology, epidemiology, exposure, and treatment.

Authors:  Malin G Ahlström; Jacob P Thyssen; Michael Wennervaldt; Torkil Menné; Jeanne D Johansen
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 6.600

6.  Prevalence of contact allergy in the general population in different European regions.

Authors:  T L Diepgen; R F Ofenloch; M Bruze; P Bertuccio; S Cazzaniga; P-J Coenraads; P Elsner; M Goncalo; Å Svensson; L Naldi
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2015-12-26       Impact factor: 9.302

Review 7.  Contact allergy and allergic contact dermatitis in children - a review of current data.

Authors:  Anne Birgitte Simonsen; Mette Deleuran; Jeanne Duus Johansen; Mette Sommerlund
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 6.600

8.  Positive patch test reactions in older individuals: retrospective analysis from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group, 1994-2008.

Authors:  Erin M Warshaw; Srihari I Raju; Joseph F Fowler; Howard I Maibach; Donald V Belsito; Kathryn A Zug; Robert L Rietschel; James S Taylor; C G Toby Mathias; Anthony F Fransway; Vincent A DeLeo; James G Marks; Frances J Storrs; Melanie D Pratt; Denis Sasseville
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 11.527

9.  Nickel on the market: a baseline survey of articles in 'prolonged contact' with skin.

Authors:  Evelina Ringborg; Carola Lidén; Anneli Julander
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 6.600

10.  High prevalence of contact allergy in adolescence: results from the population-based BAMSE birth cohort.

Authors:  Maria Lagrelius; Carl-Fredrik Wahlgren; Mihály Matura; Inger Kull; Carola Lidén
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 6.600

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  The management of patent foramen ovale in divers: where do we stand?

Authors:  Anastasios Apostolos; Maria Drakopoulou; George Trantalis; Αndreas Synetos; George Oikonomou; Theodoros Karapanayiotides; Costas Tsioufis; Konstantinos Toutouzas
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 6.430

2.  Analysis of Clinical Features of Kounis Syndrome Induced by Cephalosporin.

Authors:  Weijin Fang; Liying Song; Zhenzhen Deng; Wei Sun; Zuojun Li; Chunjiang Wang
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-04-26

Review 3.  Current Challenges and Future Directions in Handling Stroke Patients With Patent Foramen Ovale-A Brief Review.

Authors:  Charlotte Huber; Rolf Wachter; Johann Pelz; Dominik Michalski
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 4.003

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.