Alec Morton1, Ebru Bish2, Itamar Megiddo3, Weifen Zhuang4, Roberto Aringhieri5, Sally Brailsford6, Sarang Deo7, Na Geng8, Julie Higle9, David Hutton10, Mart Janssen11, Edward H Kaplan12, Jianbin Li13, Mónica D Oliveira14, Shankar Prinja15, Marion Rauner16, Sheetal Silal17, Jie Song18. 1. University of Strathclyde London, 16 Richmond St, Glasgow, G1 1XQ, UK. alec.morton@strath.ac.uk. 2. The University of Alabama, AL, Tuscaloosa, 35487, USA. 3. University of Strathclyde London, 16 Richmond St, Glasgow, G1 1XQ, UK. 4. Xiamen University, 422 Siming S Rd, Siming District, Fujian, Xiamen, China. 5. Computer Science Dept, University of Turin, Corso Svizzera. 185, TO, 10149, Torino, Italy. 6. University of Southampton, SO17 1BJ, Southampton, United Kingdom. 7. Indian School of Business, Telangana, 500111, Hyderabad, India. 8. Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Minhang District, 200240, Shanghai, China. 9. University of Southern California, CA, 90007, Los Angeles, United States. 10. University of Michigan, 500 S State St, MI, 48109, Ann Arbor, United States. 11. Sanquin Research, Amsterdam, Netherlands. 12. Yale School of Management, Yale School of Public Health, Yale School of Engineering and Applied Science, 165 Whitney Avenue, New Haven, CT, 06511, New Haven, United States. 13. Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1037 Luoyu Rd, Hubei, 430074, Wuhan, China. 14. Centre for Management Studies of Instituto Superior Técnico (CEG-IST), Institute for Bioengineering and Biosciences, and Institute for Health and Bioeconomy - i4HB Associate Laboratory, University to Lisboa, Institute for Bioengineering and Biosciences, and Institute for Health and Bioeconomy - i4HB Associate Laboratory, 1649-001, Lisboa, Portugal. 15. Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research (PGIMER), Madhya Marg, Sector 12, 160012, Chandigarh, India. 16. University of Vienna, Faculty of Business, Economics, and Statistics Department of Business Decisions and Analytics Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz 1, A-1090, Vienna, Austria. 17. Modelling and Simulation Hub, Africa (MASHA), University of Cape Town, Cape Town, 7700, Rondebosch, South Africa. 18. Peking University, 5 Yiheyuan Rd, Haidian District, 100871, Beijing, China.
At the time of writing of this Editorial in April 2021, Covid-19 continues to ravage our planet, with an official global death toll now exceeding three million, and a horrendous legacy of economic and human damage. The roll-out of vaccination has given hope that we will soon reach the end of this chapter of history. However, it will take years for the world to overcome this calamity and many individuals whose health or livelihoods have been destroyed will never fully recover.This failure of the world to effectively respond to the challenge of Covid-19 is all the more bitter because the outbreak of a novel pathogen was entirely predictable; the spread, preventable; and the suffering, avoidable. The experience of different countries around the world shows that the ability to plan, and to execute plans in a disciplined fashion, can make all the difference between relative security and catastrophe.The challenge for Management Scientists is to show that our discipline can have a role – a critical role – as a part of this planning. Epidemiological models of disease dynamics have been prominent through this crisis but do not fully capture the constraints in the health system and cannot directly support many of the management decisions which have to be made as part of the response. As Management Scientists, our perspective and our modelling tools have the potential to address those shortcomings; but if our profession cannot demonstrate our ability to add value, others will do so in our place.
Special issue
In June 2020, Healthcare Management Science issued a call for papers for this Special Issue. We purposely convened an extensive editorial board, with representation from Africa, Asia-Pacific, Europe and North and South America. The response has been overwhelming, with a huge number of submissions over the last few months. In order to ensure timely turn-around, we have only taken papers which we could accept with minor revisions; as a result, we have had to reject many promising manuscripts. We are pleased to have been able to accept 12 papers [1-12]. We are particularly proud to be able to highlight that “From predictions to prescriptions: A data-driven response to COVID-19” by Dimitris J Bertsimas and colleagues [1] has been awarded the Pierskalla Best Paper Award for 2020 by the INFORMS Health Applications Society.It is worth highlighting that scientific papers are often years in gestation: all the work reported in this special issue has been carried out and written up within a few months. We are grateful to the authors for submitting their important work to the journal, and for expeditiously carrying out revisions, as well as the reviewers who have contributed often very detailed reviews in a timely fashion.
Conclusion
In summary, the papers in the special issue tackle a range of subjects, from system-wide planning, through service delivery, to the clinical encounter; and cover both prevention and treatment, and both mental and physical health. A common thread running through many of the papers is the difficulty of forecasting demand in an uncertain and chaotic environment, showing that there has to be a close partnership between Management Scientists and epidemiological infectious disease modellers, whose discipline can give a better understanding of the dynamics of infectious disease.Our hope is that the contents of this issue represent the first steps in the development of a body of scientific work which can help ensure that neither we nor our descendants have to live through a repeat of the events of the past year.
Authors: Stef Baas; Sander Dijkstra; Aleida Braaksma; Plom van Rooij; Fieke J Snijders; Lars Tiemessen; Richard J Boucherie Journal: Health Care Manag Sci Date: 2021-03-25
Authors: Roberto Aringhieri; Patrick Hirsch; Marion S Rauner; Melanie Reuter-Oppermanns; Margit Sommersguter-Reichmann Journal: Cent Eur J Oper Res Date: 2021-12-10 Impact factor: 2.345