| Literature DB >> 34128842 |
Wanwan Chen1, Yanmei Liu1, Hongyi Pan1, Jie Jiang2, Huaqing Xiang3, Linlin Peng4.
Abstract
ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the 3 primer of untranslated region (3'UTR) of the Pentraxin 3 (PTX3) gene and the risk of essential hypertension (EHT).PTX3 genotypes, rs2614, rs111451363, and rs73158510 locus, were found in 260 patients with EHT and 260 healthy controls. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction was used to detect plasma hsa-miR-4766-5p levels. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to detect plasma PTX3 levels. The dual-luciferase reporter assay was used to identify the binding site of hsa-miR-4766-5p to the PTX3.PTX3 rs2614 locus T allele was a high risk factor for EHT (odds ratio [OR] = 2.76, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.86-4.09, P < .01). Sex and diabetes history affected the correlation between PTX3 gene rs2614 locus SNP and EHT risk. The CCG haplotype was a protective factor for EHT (OR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.28-0.57, P < .01), whereas the TCG haplotype was a risk factor for EHT (OR = 2.35, 95% CI: 1.51-3.66, P < .01). The plasma PTX3 level of patients with EHT was significantly higher than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < .01). The area under the curve for EHT diagnosis in plasma PTX3 levels was 0.62 (95% CI: 0.57-0.66, P < .01). The plasma hsa-miR-4766-5p level in patients with EHT was significantly lower than that in the control group (P < .01). The area under the curve for the diagnosis of EHT according to the plasma hsa-miR-4766-5p level was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.85-0.91, P < .01). Plasma PTX3 levels were significantly negatively correlated with hsa-miR-4766-5p levels in patients with EHT and the control group (r = -0.87, -0.85, P < .01, P < .01). The PTX3 gene rs2614 locus C allele was the target gene of hsa-miR-4766-5p.The PTX3 rs2614 locus SNP is significantly associated with EHT risk.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34128842 PMCID: PMC8213333 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025937
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.817
Comparison of general characteristics of patients with EHT and control groups.
| EHT (n = 260) | Control (n = 260) | ||
| Age, y (mean ± SD) | 54.88 ± 7.86 | 54.29 ± 8.93 | .42 |
| <60 | 190 (73.08%) | 194 (74.62%) | |
| ≥60 | 70 (26.92%) | 66 (25.38%) | |
| Sex, n (%) | .66 | ||
| Male | 127 (48.85%) | 132 (50.77%) | |
| Female | 133 (51.15%) | 128 (49.23%) | |
| BMI, kg/m2 (mean ± SD) | 26.76 ± 3.89 | 25.59 ± 4.00 | <.01 |
| <24 | 97 (37.31%) | 91 (35.00%) | |
| ≥24 | 163 (62.69%) | 169 (65.00%) | |
| Smoking, n (%) | .70 | ||
| Yes | 70 (26.92%) | 66 (25.38%) | |
| No | 190 (73.08%) | 194 (74.62%) | |
| Drinking, n (%) | .37 | ||
| Yes | 71 (27.31%) | 62 (23.85%) | |
| No | 189 (72.69%) | 198 (76.15%) | |
| SBP, mmHg (mean ± SD) | 147.89 ± 17.04 | 128.21 ± 6.14 | <.01 |
| DBP, mmHg (mean ± SD) | 86.32 ± 14.03 | 81.53 ± 4.57 | <.01 |
| LDL-C, mmol/L (mean ± SD) | 2.70 ± 0.79 | 2.49 ± 0.81 | <.01 |
| HDL-C, mmol/L (mean ± SD) | 1.18 ± 0.44 | 1.19 ± 0.38 | .78 |
| Diabetes, n (%) | <.01 | ||
| Yes | 143 (55.00%) | 54 (20.77%) | |
| No | 117 (45.00%) | 206 (79.23%) | |
| Dyslipidemia, n (%) | <.01 | ||
| Yes | 167 (64.23%) | 76 (29.23%) | |
| No | 93 (35.77%) | 184 (70.77%) | |
| Total cholesterol, mmol/L (mean ± SD) | 4.71 ± 1.20 | 4.42 ± 1.15 | <.01 |
| Triglyceride, mmol/L (mean ± SD) | 1.38 ± 0.65 | 1.20 ± 0.67 | <.01 |
Correlation between genotype and allele frequency of 3′UTR SNP loci of PTX3 and risk of EHT.
| EHT (n = 260) | Control (n = 260) | OR (95% CI)∗ | ||
| rs2614 | ||||
| CC | 187 (71.92%) | 223 (85.77%) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| CT | 51 (19.62%) | 35 (13.46%) | 1.74 (1.08–2.79) | .03 |
| TT | 22 (8.46%) | 2 (0.77%) | 2.01 (1.54–2.18) | <.01 |
| Additive model | 1.10 (0.95–1.26) | .21 | ||
| Dominant model | 2.35 (1.51–3.66) | <.01 | ||
| Recessive model | 1.91 (1.47–2.07) | <.01 | ||
| C | 425 (81.73%) | 481 (92.50%) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| T | 95 (18.27%) | 39 (7.50%) | 2.76 (1.86–4.09) | <.01 |
| rs111451363 | ||||
| CC | 233 (89.62%) | 241 (92.69%) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| CT | 22 (8.46%) | 18 (6.92%) | 1.26 (0.66–2.42) | .59 |
| TT | 5 (1.92%) | 1 (0.38%) | 1.70 (0.74–2.03) | .21 |
| Additive model | 1.03 (0.81–1.33) | .84 | ||
| Dominant model | 1.40 (0.762.56) | .35 | ||
| Recessive model | 1.68 (0.73–2.01) | .22 | ||
| C | 488 (93.85%) | 500 (96.15%) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| T | 32 (6.15%) | 20 (3.85%) | 1.64 (0.9–2.91) | .12 |
| rs73158510 | ||||
| GG | 208 (80.00%) | 222 (85.38%) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| GA | 45 (17.31%) | 35 (13.46%) | 1.37 (0.85–2.22) | .24 |
| AA | 7 (2.69%) | 3 (1.15%) | 1.45 (0.73–1.92) | .30 |
| Additive model | 1.03 (0.83–1.38) | .66 | ||
| Dominant model | 1.46 (0.92–2.31) | .13 | ||
| Recessive model | 1.41 (0.71–1.87) | .34 | ||
| G | 461 (88.65%) | 479 (91.12%) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| A | 59 (11.35%) | 41 (7.88%) | 1.50 (0.98–2.27) | .07 |
Hierarchical analysis of the correlation between genotype and allele frequency of rs2614 locus of PTX3 gene and EHT risk.
| EHT (n = 260) | Control (n = 260) | OR (95% CI)∗ | ||
| Age | ||||
| <60 | ||||
| CC | 136 (71.58%) | 163 (84.02%) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| CT/TT | 54 (28.42%) | 31 (15.98%) | 2.09 (1.27–3.43) | <.01 |
| ≥ 60 | ||||
| CC | 51 (72.86%) | 60 (90.91%) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| CT/TT | 19 (27.14%) | 6 (9.09%) | 1.65 (1.12–2.09) | .01 |
| Sex | ||||
| Male | ||||
| CC | 90 (70.87%) | 116 (87.88%) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| CT/TT | 37 (29.13%) | 16 (12.12%) | 1.60 (1.21–1.97) | <.01 |
| Female | ||||
| CC | 97 (72.93%) | 107 (83.59%) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| CT/TT | 36 (27.07%) | 21 (16.41%) | 1.33 (0.99–1.67) | .06 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | ||||
| <24 | ||||
| CC | 67 (69.07%) | 79 (86.81%) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| CT/TT | 30 (30.93%) | 12 (13.19%) | 1.56 (1.14–1.95) | .01 |
| ≥24 | ||||
| CC | 120 (73.62%) | 144 (85.21%) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| CT/TT | 43 (26.38%) | 25 (14.79%) | 1.39 (1.07–1.72) | .01 |
| Smoking | ||||
| Ever | ||||
| CC | 49 (70.00%) | 60 (90.91%) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| CT/TT | 21 (30.00%) | 6 (9.09%) | 1.73 (1.20–2.16) | <.01 |
| Never | ||||
| CC | 138 (72.63%) | 163 (84.02%) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| CT/TT | 52 (27.37%) | 31 (15.98%) | 1.98 (1.20–3.26) | .01 |
| Drinking | ||||
| Ever | ||||
| CC | 49 (69.01%) | 57 (91.94%) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| CT/TT | 22 (30.99%) | 5 (8.06%) | 1.76 (1.24–2.14) | <.01 |
| Never | ||||
| CC | 138 (73.02%) | 166 (83.84%) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| CT/TT | 51 (26.98%) | 32 (16.16%) | 1.35 (1.07–1.66) | .01 |
| Diabetes | ||||
| Ever | ||||
| CC | 99 (69.23%) | 45 (83.33%) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| CT/TT | 44 (30.77%) | 9 (16.67%) | 1.21 (0.98–1.39) | .07 |
| Never | ||||
| CC | 88 (75.21%) | 178 (86.41%) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| CT/TT | 29 (24.79%) | 28 (13.59%) | 1.54 (1.08–2.07) | .02 |
| Dyslipidemia | ||||
| Ever | ||||
| CC | 123 (73.65%) | 68 (89.47%) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| CT/TT | 44 (26.35%) | 8 (10.53%) | 3.04 (1.35–6.83) | <.01 |
| Never | ||||
| CC | 64 (68.82%) | 155 (84.24%) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| CT/TT | 29 (31.18%) | 29 (15.76%) | 1.71 (1.18–2.36) | <.01 |
Hierarchical analysis of the correlation between genotype and allele frequency of PTX3 gene rs111451363 and EHT risk.
| EHT (n = 260) | Control (n = 260) | OR (95% CI)∗ | ||
| Age | ||||
| <60 | ||||
| CC | 166 (87.37%) | 178 (91.75%) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| CT/TT | 24 (12.63%) | 16 (8.25%) | 1.61 (0.83–3.13) | .22 |
| ≥60 | ||||
| CC | 67 (95.71%) | 63 (95.45%) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| CT/TT | 3 (4.29%) | 3 (4.55%) | 0.94 (0.18–4.83) | .94 |
| Sex | ||||
| Male | ||||
| CC | 117 (92.13%) | 123 (93.18%) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| CT/TT | 10 (7.87%) | 9 (6.82%) | 1.08 (0.59–1.58) | .93 |
| Female | ||||
| CC | 116 (87.22%) | 118 (92.19%) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| CT/TT | 17 (12.78%) | 10 (7.81%) | 1.27 (0.84–1.67) | .27 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | ||||
| <24 | ||||
| CC | 81 (83.51%) | 85 (93.41%) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| CT/TT | 16 (16.49%) | 6 (6.59%) | 1.49 (0.98–1.89) | .06 |
| ≥24 | ||||
| CC | 152 (93.25%) | 156 (92.31%) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| CT/TT | 11 (6.75%) | 13 (7.69%) | 0.93 (0.52–1.39) | .90 |
| Smoking | ||||
| Ever | ||||
| CC | 63 (90.00%) | 65 (98.48%) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| CT/TT | 7 (10.00%) | 1 (1.52%) | 1.78 (0.92–2.05) | .08 |
| Never | ||||
| CC | 170 (89.47%) | 176 (90.72%) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| CT/TT | 20 (10.53%) | 18 (9.28%) | 1.07 (0.72–1.44) | .81 |
| Drinking | ||||
| Ever | ||||
| CC | 65 (91.55%) | 61 (98.39%) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| CT/TT | 6 (8.45%) | 1 (1.61%) | 1.66 (0.79–1.95) | .17 |
| Never | ||||
| CC | 168 (88.89%) | 180 (90.91%) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| CT/TT | 21 (11.11%) | 18 (9.09%) | 1.12 (0.76–1.48) | .62 |
| Diabetes | ||||
| Ever | ||||
| CC | 130 (90.91%) | 45 (83.33%) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| CT/TT | 13 (9.09%) | 9 (16.67%) | 0.80 (0.49–1.08) | .21 |
| Never | ||||
| CC | 103 (88.03%) | 196 (83.33%) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| CT/TT | 13 (9.09%) | 10 (16.67%) | 1.69 (1.04–2.33) | .03 |
| Dyslipidemia | ||||
| Ever | ||||
| CC | 147 (88.03%) | 71 (93.42%) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| CT/TT | 20 (11.98%) | 5 (6.58%) | 1.19 (0.86–1.40) | .29 |
| Never | ||||
| CC | 86 (92.47%) | 170 (92.39%) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| CT/TT | 7 (7.53%) | 14 (7.61%) | 0.99 (0.45–1.77) | .98 |
Hierarchical analysis of the correlation between genotype and allele frequency of PTX3 gene rs73158510 locus and the EHT risk.
| EHT (n = 260) | Control (n = 260) | OR (95% CI)∗ | ||
| Age | ||||
| <60 | ||||
| GG | 157 (82.63%) | 160 (82.47%) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| GA/AA | 33 (17.37%) | 34 (17.53%) | 0.99 (0.73–1.29) | .97 |
| ≥ 60 | ||||
| GG | 51 (72.86%) | 62 (93.94%) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| GA/AA | 19 (27.14%) | 4 (6.06%) | 1.83 (1.26–2.20) | <.01 |
| Sex | ||||
| Male | ||||
| GG | 101 (79.53%) | 110 (83.33%) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| GA/AA | 26 (20.47%) | 22 (16.67%) | 1.13 (0.80–1.50) | .53 |
| Female | ||||
| GG | 107 (80.45%) | 112 (87.50%) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| GA/AA | 26 (19.55%) | 16 (12.50%) | 1.27 (0.91–1.63) | .17 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | ||||
| <24 | ||||
| GG | 81 (83.51%) | 75 (82.42%) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| GA/AA | 16 (16.49%) | 16 (17.58%) | 0.96 (0.60–1.37) | .84 |
| ≥ 24 | ||||
| GG | 127 (77.91%) | 147 (86.98%) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| GA/AA | 36 (22.09%) | 22 (13.02%) | 1.34 (1.01–1.67) | .04 |
| Smoking | ||||
| Ever | ||||
| GG | 57 (81.43%) | 59 (89.39%) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| GA/AA | 13 (18.57%) | 7 (10.61%) | 1.32 (0.80–1.81) | .29 |
| Never | ||||
| GG | 151 (79.47%) | 163 (84.02%) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| GA/AA | 39 (20.53%) | 31 (15.98%) | 1.16 (0.88–1.46) | .31 |
| Drinking | ||||
| Ever | ||||
| GG | 58 (81.69%) | 51 (82.26%) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| GA/AA | 13 (18.31%) | 11 (17.74%) | 1.02 (0.60–1.48) | .93 |
| Never | ||||
| GG | 150 (79.37%) | 171 (83.36%) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| GA/AA | 39 (20.63%) | 27 (13.64%) | 1.27 (0.96–1.58) | .09 |
| Diabetes | ||||
| Ever | ||||
| GG | 115 (80.42%) | 42 (77.78%) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| GA/AA | 28 (19.58%) | 12 (22.22%) | 0.96 (0.72–1.17) | .83 |
| Never | ||||
| GG | 93 (79.49%) | 180 (87.38%) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| GA/AA | 24 (20.51%) | 26 (12.62%) | 1.41 (0.96–1.94) | .09 |
| Dyslipidemia | ||||
| Ever | ||||
| GG | 137 (82.04%) | 69 (90.79%) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| GA/AA | 30 (17.96%) | 7 (9.21%) | 1.22 (0.95–1.41) | .12 |
| Never | ||||
| GG | 71 (76.34%) | 153 (83.15%) | 1.00 (Reference) | |
| GA/AA | 22 (23.66%) | 31 (16.85%) | 1.31 (0.85–1.89) | .23 |
MDR analysis of the correlation between rs2614, rs73158510, and rs111451363 loci and the EHT risk.
| Model | Accuracy | CVC | ||
| rs2614 | 56.92% | 8/10 | 3.52 | .09 |
| rs2614, rs73158510 | 57.84% | 7/10 | 4.12 | .06 |
| rs2614, rs73158510, rs111451363 | 58.93% | 10/10 | 8.54 | .01 |
Figure 1MDR analysis of rs2614, rs73158510, and rs111451363 site interactions. (A) Cyclic and dendrogram analysis of SNP–SNP interactions. Data below the SNP site represent the effect on the risk of EHT. The data on the connection line represent the magnitude of the SNP–SNP interaction. The larger the value, the stronger the interaction. (B) Graphical Model, “a” indicates the model with the lowest risk of EHT, and “b” indicates the model with the highest risk of EHT. EHT = essential hypertension.
Figure 2Haploview 4.2 Analysis of haplotypes of PTX3 SNP loci.
Haplotype analysis of rs2614, rs111451363, and rs73158510.
| Haplotype∗ | EHT (n = 260) | Control (n = 260) | OR (95% CI) | |
| CCG | 108 (41.54%) | 166 (63.85%) | 0.40 (0.28–0.57) | <.01 |
| CCA | 52 (20.00%) | 38 (14.62%) | 1.19 (0.95–1.45) | .13 |
| TCG | 73 (28.08%) | 37 (14.23%) | 2.35 (1.51–3.66) | <.01 |
| CTG | 27 (10.38%) | 19 (7.31%) | 1.19 (0.87–1.51) | .28 |
Figure 3Analysis of plasma PTX3 and hsa-miR-4766-5p levels. (A) ELISA detects plasma PTX3 levels. (B) ROC analysis of the diagnostic value of plasma PTX3 levels for EHT. (C) qRT-PCR detection of plasma hsa-miR-4766-5p levels. (D) ROC analysis of plasma hsa-miR-4766-5p levels in the diagnosis of EHT. (E) Correlation between plasma PTX3 and hsa-miR-4766-5p levels in patients with EHT. (F) Correlation between plasma PTX3 and hsa-miR-4766-5p levels in the control group. EHT = essential hypertension.
Figure 4Analysis of the binding site of PTX3 to hsa-miR-4766-5p. (A) Bioinformatics predicts the binding site of PTX3 to hsa-miR-4766-5p. (B) Double luciferase reports experimental test results. NC = No template control. ∗P < .05, compared with NC group.