Literature DB >> 34127080

Surgery school-who, what, when, and how: results of a national survey of multidisciplinary teams delivering group preoperative education.

I Fecher-Jones1, C Grimmett2, F J Carter3, D H Conway4, D Z H Levett5, J A Moore4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Group education is increasing in popularity as a means of preparing patients for surgery. In recent years, these 'surgery schools' have evolved from primarily informing patients of what to expect before and after surgery, to providing support and encouragement for patients to 'prehabilitate' prior to surgery, through improving physical fitness, nutrition and emotional wellbeing.
METHOD: A survey aimed at clinicians delivering surgery schools was employed to capture a national overview of activity to establish research and practice priorities in this area. The survey was circulated online via the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery UK Society and the Centre for Perioperative Care mailing lists as well as social media.
RESULTS: There were 80 responses describing 28 active and 4 planned surgery schools across the UK and Ireland. Schools were designed and delivered by multidisciplinary teams, contained broadly similar content and were well attended. Most were funded by the National Health Service. The majority included aspects of prehabilitation most commonly the importance of physical fitness. Seventy five percent of teams collected patient outcome data, but less than half collected data to establish the clinical effectiveness of the school. Few describe explicit inclusion of evidence-based behavior change techniques, but collaboration and partnerships with community teams, gyms and local charities were considered important in supporting patients to make changes in health behaviors prior to surgery.
CONCLUSION: It is recommended that teams work with patients when designing surgery schools and use evidence-based behavior change frameworks and techniques to inform their content. There is a need for high-quality research studies to determine the clinical effectiveness of this type of education intervention.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Perioperative medicine; Prehabilitation; Preoperative education; Surgery school

Year:  2021        PMID: 34127080     DOI: 10.1186/s13741-021-00188-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perioper Med (Lond)        ISSN: 2047-0525


  16 in total

Review 1.  Psychological factors, prehabilitation and surgical outcomes: evidence and future directions.

Authors:  D Z H Levett; C Grimmett
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 6.955

Review 2.  Pre-operative nutrition and the elective surgical patient: why, how and what?

Authors:  C Gillis; P E Wischmeyer
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 6.955

3.  Impact of a trimodal prehabilitation program on functional recovery after colorectal cancer surgery: a pilot study.

Authors:  Chao Li; Francesco Carli; Lawrence Lee; Patrick Charlebois; Barry Stein; Alexander S Liberman; Pepa Kaneva; Berson Augustin; Mingkwan Wongyingsinn; Ann Gamsa; Do Jun Kim; Melina C Vassiliou; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Group instruction in preparation for surgery.

Authors:  E J Mezzanotte
Journal:  Am J Nurs       Date:  1970-01       Impact factor: 2.220

5.  Depression increases the length of hospitalization for patients undergoing thoracic surgery: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Rieko Kitagawa; Norio Yasui-Furukori; Takao Tsushima; Sunao Kaneko; Ikuo Fukuda
Journal:  Psychosomatics       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.386

6.  Does preoperative hip rehabilitation advice improve recovery and patient satisfaction?

Authors:  Alison H McGregor; Helen Rylands; Ann Owen; Caroline J Doré; Sean P F Hughes
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions.

Authors:  Susan Michie; Michelle Richardson; Marie Johnston; Charles Abraham; Jill Francis; Wendy Hardeman; Martin P Eccles; James Cane; Caroline E Wood
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2013-08

8.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of maintenance of physical activity behaviour change in cancer survivors.

Authors:  Chloe Grimmett; Teresa Corbett; Jennifer Brunet; Jonathan Shepherd; Bernardine M Pinto; Carl R May; Claire Foster
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2019-04-27       Impact factor: 6.457

9.  A randomised controlled trial to evaluate a nurse-led programme of support and lifestyle management for patients awaiting cardiac surgery 'Fit for surgery: Fit for life' study.

Authors:  Helen Goodman; Amanda Parsons; June Davison; Michael Preedy; Emma Peters; Caroline Shuldham; John Pepper; Martin R Cowie
Journal:  Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 3.908

10.  Engaging patients to improve quality of care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Yvonne Bombard; G Ross Baker; Elaina Orlando; Carol Fancott; Pooja Bhatia; Selina Casalino; Kanecy Onate; Jean-Louis Denis; Marie-Pascale Pomey
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.