I Fecher-Jones1, C Grimmett2, F J Carter3, D H Conway4, D Z H Levett5, J A Moore4. 1. University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK. Imogen.fecher@uhs.nhs.uk. 2. School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. 3. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) UK, 4 Aldon House, Yeovil, UK. 4. Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK. 5. University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Group education is increasing in popularity as a means of preparing patients for surgery. In recent years, these 'surgery schools' have evolved from primarily informing patients of what to expect before and after surgery, to providing support and encouragement for patients to 'prehabilitate' prior to surgery, through improving physical fitness, nutrition and emotional wellbeing. METHOD: A survey aimed at clinicians delivering surgery schools was employed to capture a national overview of activity to establish research and practice priorities in this area. The survey was circulated online via the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery UK Society and the Centre for Perioperative Care mailing lists as well as social media. RESULTS: There were 80 responses describing 28 active and 4 planned surgery schools across the UK and Ireland. Schools were designed and delivered by multidisciplinary teams, contained broadly similar content and were well attended. Most were funded by the National Health Service. The majority included aspects of prehabilitation most commonly the importance of physical fitness. Seventy five percent of teams collected patient outcome data, but less than half collected data to establish the clinical effectiveness of the school. Few describe explicit inclusion of evidence-based behavior change techniques, but collaboration and partnerships with community teams, gyms and local charities were considered important in supporting patients to make changes in health behaviors prior to surgery. CONCLUSION: It is recommended that teams work with patients when designing surgery schools and use evidence-based behavior change frameworks and techniques to inform their content. There is a need for high-quality research studies to determine the clinical effectiveness of this type of education intervention.
BACKGROUND: Group education is increasing in popularity as a means of preparing patients for surgery. In recent years, these 'surgery schools' have evolved from primarily informing patients of what to expect before and after surgery, to providing support and encouragement for patients to 'prehabilitate' prior to surgery, through improving physical fitness, nutrition and emotional wellbeing. METHOD: A survey aimed at clinicians delivering surgery schools was employed to capture a national overview of activity to establish research and practice priorities in this area. The survey was circulated online via the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery UK Society and the Centre for Perioperative Care mailing lists as well as social media. RESULTS: There were 80 responses describing 28 active and 4 planned surgery schools across the UK and Ireland. Schools were designed and delivered by multidisciplinary teams, contained broadly similar content and were well attended. Most were funded by the National Health Service. The majority included aspects of prehabilitation most commonly the importance of physical fitness. Seventy five percent of teams collected patient outcome data, but less than half collected data to establish the clinical effectiveness of the school. Few describe explicit inclusion of evidence-based behavior change techniques, but collaboration and partnerships with community teams, gyms and local charities were considered important in supporting patients to make changes in health behaviors prior to surgery. CONCLUSION: It is recommended that teams work with patients when designing surgery schools and use evidence-based behavior change frameworks and techniques to inform their content. There is a need for high-quality research studies to determine the clinical effectiveness of this type of education intervention.
Entities:
Keywords:
Perioperative medicine; Prehabilitation; Preoperative education; Surgery school
Authors: Chao Li; Francesco Carli; Lawrence Lee; Patrick Charlebois; Barry Stein; Alexander S Liberman; Pepa Kaneva; Berson Augustin; Mingkwan Wongyingsinn; Ann Gamsa; Do Jun Kim; Melina C Vassiliou; Liane S Feldman Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2012-10-09 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Susan Michie; Michelle Richardson; Marie Johnston; Charles Abraham; Jill Francis; Wendy Hardeman; Martin P Eccles; James Cane; Caroline E Wood Journal: Ann Behav Med Date: 2013-08
Authors: Chloe Grimmett; Teresa Corbett; Jennifer Brunet; Jonathan Shepherd; Bernardine M Pinto; Carl R May; Claire Foster Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2019-04-27 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Helen Goodman; Amanda Parsons; June Davison; Michael Preedy; Emma Peters; Caroline Shuldham; John Pepper; Martin R Cowie Journal: Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs Date: 2007-12-21 Impact factor: 3.908