Literature DB >> 34125589

Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Lincosamide Therapy in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.

Isabel Guthridge1, Simon Smith1, Matthew Law2, Enzo Binotto1, Josh Hanson1,2.   

Abstract

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia has a high case-fatality rate, but currently recommended antimicrobial therapies have many shortcomings. The efficacy and safety of lincosamide therapy for MRSA bacteremia is incompletely defined. A retrospective audit was done of the management of all adults with MRSA bacteremia at an Australian tertiary referral hospital between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2020. A total of 176 patients were included. The case-fatality rate declined from 14/57 (25%) in the first half of the study to 12/119 (10%) in the second half (P = 0.01). Of the 172 patients receiving antibiotics, 62 (36%) received a lincosamide-predominant regimen (lincosamide monotherapy for >50% of the intravenous course). The patients receiving lincosamide-predominant intravenous therapy had lower in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01 to 0.53; P = 0.01) and a lower incidence of renal complications (OR [95% CI], 0.34 [0.15-0.75]; P = 0.008) than patients receiving an alternative regimen. In multivariate analysis that also considered age, disease severity, comorbidity, infectious diseases consultation, source control, and the year of admission, patients receiving a lincosamide-predominant regimen were still less likely to die in the hospital than those receiving an alternative regimen (OR [95% CI], 0.05 [0.00 to 0.65]; P = 0.02). Lincosamides appear to have utility, at least as stepdown therapy, in the treatment of MRSA bacteremia, particularly in young, clinically stable patients with few comorbidities in whom endocarditis has been excluded. Prospective studies will help define their optimal role.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Staphylococcus aureus; antimicrobial resistance; antimicrobial safety; bacteremia; lincosamides; methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; sepsis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34125589      PMCID: PMC8370195          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00343-21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  25 in total

1.  Problem of immortal time bias in cohort studies: example using statins for preventing progression of diabetes.

Authors:  Linda E Lévesque; James A Hanley; Abbas Kezouh; Samy Suissa
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-03-12

2.  Increasing prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in remote Australian communities: implications for patients and clinicians.

Authors:  Isabel Guthridge; Simon Smith; Peter Horne; Josh Hanson
Journal:  Pathology       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 5.306

3.  Epidemics of diarrhea caused by a clindamycin-resistant strain of Clostridium difficile in four hospitals.

Authors:  S Johnson; M H Samore; K A Farrow; G E Killgore; F C Tenover; D Lyras; J I Rood; P DeGirolami; A L Baltch; M E Rafferty; S M Pear; D N Gerding
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-11-25       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Antibiotics currently used in the treatment of infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  C Rayner; W J Munckhof
Journal:  Intern Med J       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.048

5.  The Eagle effect revisited: efficacy of clindamycin, erythromycin, and penicillin in the treatment of streptococcal myositis.

Authors:  D L Stevens; A E Gibbons; R Bergstrom; V Winn
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 5.226

6.  What proportion of vancomycin trough levels are drawn too early?: frequency and impact on clinical actions.

Authors:  Aileen P Morrison; Stacy E F Melanson; Marcy G Carty; David W Bates; Paul M Szumita; Milenko J Tanasijevic
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.493

7.  Effect of Vancomycin or Daptomycin With vs Without an Antistaphylococcal β-Lactam on Mortality, Bacteremia, Relapse, or Treatment Failure in Patients With MRSA Bacteremia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Steven Y C Tong; David C Lye; Dafna Yahav; Archana Sud; J Owen Robinson; Jane Nelson; Sophia Archuleta; Matthew A Roberts; Alan Cass; David L Paterson; Hong Foo; Mical Paul; Stephen D Guy; Adrian R Tramontana; Genevieve B Walls; Stephen McBride; Narin Bak; Niladri Ghosh; Benjamin A Rogers; Anna P Ralph; Jane Davies; Patricia E Ferguson; Ravindra Dotel; Genevieve L McKew; Timothy J Gray; Natasha E Holmes; Simon Smith; Morgyn S Warner; Shirin Kalimuddin; Barnaby E Young; Naomi Runnegar; David N Andresen; Nicholas A Anagnostou; Sandra A Johnson; Mark D Chatfield; Allen C Cheng; Vance G Fowler; Benjamin P Howden; Niamh Meagher; David J Price; Sebastiaan J van Hal; Matthew V N O'Sullivan; Joshua S Davis
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Increasing Clindamycin and Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole Resistance in Pediatric Staphylococcus aureus Infections.

Authors:  Dina F Khamash; Annie Voskertchian; Pranita D Tamma; Ibukunoluwa C Akinboyo; Karen C Carroll; Aaron M Milstone
Journal:  J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 3.164

9.  High burden of complicated skin and soft tissue infections in the Indigenous population of Central Australia due to dominant Panton Valentine leucocidin clones ST93-MRSA and CC121-MSSA.

Authors:  Susan A J Harch; Eleanor MacMorran; Steven Y C Tong; Deborah C Holt; Judith Wilson; Eugene Athan; Saliya Hewagama
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.090

10.  Incidence of community onset MRSA in Australia: least reported where it is Most prevalent.

Authors:  Jessica K Cameron; Lisa Hall; Steven Y C Tong; David L Paterson; Kate Halton
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 4.887

View more
  1 in total

1.  The epidemiology and outcomes of central nervous system infections in Far North Queensland, tropical Australia; 2000-2019.

Authors:  Hannah Gora; Simon Smith; Ian Wilson; Annie Preston-Thomas; Nicole Ramsamy; Josh Hanson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.