Literature DB >> 34125439

Evidence of Nasal Cooling and Sensory Impairments Driving Patient Symptoms With Septal Deviation.

Jennifer Malik1, Barak M Spector1, Zhenxing Wu1, Jennifer Markley1, Songzhu Zhao2, Bradley A Otto1, Alexander A Farag1, Kai Zhao1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: About 260,000 septoplasties are performed annually in the US to address nasal septal deviation (NSD). Yet, we do not consistently understand what aspects of NSD result in symptoms. STUDY
DESIGN: Blinded cohort study.
METHODS: Two fellowship-trained surgeons blindly reviewed computerized tomography (CTs) of 10 confirmed NSD patients mixed with 36 healthy controls. All patients were correctly identified, however, 24/36 controls were falsely identified by both surgeons as patients (33.3% specificity), which were grouped as asymptomatic NSD (aNSD), while the remaining controls as non-NSD (healthy). Acoustic rhinometry, rhinomanometry, individual CT-based computational fluid dynamics and nasal sensory testing were applied to address the puzzling questions of why these aNSD had no symptoms and, more fundamentally, what caused symptoms in sNSD patients.
RESULTS: aNSD reported no nasal symptoms - Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation score (sNSD: 60.50 ± 13.00; aNSD: 5.20 ± 5.41; non-NSD: 6.66 ± 7.17, P < .05); 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test score (sNSD: 32.60 ± 14.13; aNSD: 10.04 ± 10.10; non-NSD: 9.08 ± 12.42, P < .001). No significant differences in measured nasal resistance, minimum cross-sectional area (MCA), degree of septal deviation, and nasal airflow distributions were found between sNSD and aNSD groups. Only three variables differentiate sNSD versus aNSD: anterior averaged heat flux on deviated side, inferior turbinate peak heat flux on non-deviated side, and nasal cool sensitivity measured by menthol lateralization threshold, with no significant differences among these variables found between the two healthy groups (aNSD vs. non-NSD). These variables by themselves or combined can differentiate sNSD from controls with higher specificity than the physicians (ROC area under the curve = 0.84 with 70% sensitivity and 91.6% specificity).
CONCLUSIONS: This study sheds light on the potential mechanisms of NSD symptomatology: distorted nasal cooling due to NSD exacerbated by poorer nasal mucosal sensitivity. It further supports our previous hypothesis that nasal obstruction complaints do not result directly from obstruction, rather from the capacity of our nose to subjectively sense airflow cooling. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 132:509-517, 2022.
© 2021 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Septal deviation; computational fluid dynamics; nasal airflow dynamics

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34125439      PMCID: PMC8669045          DOI: 10.1002/lary.29673

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  36 in total

1.  The deviated nose: optimizing results using a simplified classification and algorithmic approach.

Authors:  Rod J Rohrich; Jack P Gunter; Mark A Deuber; William P Adams
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Rhinomanometric detection rate of rhinoscopically-assessed septal deviations.

Authors:  P L Huygen; A B Klaassen; T J de Leeuw; R T Wentges
Journal:  Rhinology       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.681

Review 3.  Surgical Management of Nasal Airway Obstruction.

Authors:  John F Teichgraeber; Ronald P Gruber; Neil Tanna
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.017

Review 4.  Correlation between subjective and objective evaluation of the nasal airway. A systematic review of the highest level of evidence.

Authors:  R F André; H D Vuyk; A Ahmed; K Graamans; G J Nolst Trenité
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.597

5.  Clinical assessment is an accurate predictor of which patients will need septoplasty.

Authors:  Ahmad R Sedaghat; Nicolas Y Busaba; Michael J Cunningham; David A Kieff
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Septoplasty: long-term evaluation of results.

Authors:  Paulo Borges Dinis; Haula Haider
Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.808

7.  Quality of life assessment in nasal airway obstruction.

Authors:  John S Rhee; David T Book; Mary Burzynski; Timothy L Smith
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Type and severity of septal deviation are not related with the degree of subjective nasal obstruction.

Authors:  S Verhoeven; B Schmelzer
Journal:  Rhinology       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 3.681

9.  Perceiving nasal patency through mucosal cooling rather than air temperature or nasal resistance.

Authors:  Kai Zhao; Kara Blacker; Yuehao Luo; Bruce Bryant; Jianbo Jiang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Measurement tools for the diagnosis of nasal septal deviation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Tehnia Aziz; Vincent L Biron; Kal Ansari; Carlos Flores-Mir
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-04-24
View more
  1 in total

1.  Otolaryngologists' radiological assessment of nasal septum deviation symptomatology.

Authors:  Thomas J Lepley; Roberto P Frusciante; Jennifer Malik; Alexander Farag; Bradley A Otto; Kai Zhao
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 2.503

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.