Literature DB >> 34125224

Errors in the Number of Patients and Results.

.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34125224      PMCID: PMC8204199          DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.15787

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Netw Open        ISSN: 2574-3805


× No keyword cloud information.
In the Original Investigation titled “Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Preferences of People Receiving Dialysis,”[1] published August 24, 2020, 2 surveys from 3 study participants were erroneously included in the analyses. After excluding the results of the second survey for each of these 3 participants, 1592 patients were approached, 1431 were invited to participate, 1006 agreed to participate, and 873 (61.0%) were included in the corrected analyses. The corrected analyses resulted in changes to numerators, denominators, percentages, and effect sizes throughout the text and tables; most results differ from the original article by less than 1 decimal point. In addition, the omnibus P value for the association of time on dialysis with preference for cardiopulmonary resuscitation did not reach the threshold for statistical significance in the corrected analyses; the correct P value is .052. Thus, self-reported participant preference for cardiopulmonary resuscitation was not associated with receiving dialysis for longer periods. This article has been corrected.[1] In addition, 1 number was corrected in the related Invited Commentary.[2]
  2 in total

1.  Distinguishing Wants vs Preferences for End-of-Life Care: Can You Tell Me What You Want, What You Really, Really Want?

Authors:  Davene R Wright
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-08-03

2.  Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Preferences of People Receiving Dialysis.

Authors:  Gwen M Bernacki; Ruth A Engelberg; J Randall Curtis; Manjula Kurella Tamura; Lyndia C Brumback; Danielle C Lavallee; Elizabeth K Vig; Ann M O'Hare
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-08-03
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.