| Literature DB >> 34125068 |
Ji-Hyun Lee1, Hyeoun-Ae Park2, Tae-Min Song3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: South Korea has the lowest fertility rate in the world despite considerable governmental efforts to boost it. Increasing the fertility rate and achieving the desired outcomes of any implemented policies requires reliable data on the ongoing trends in fertility and preparations for the future based on these trends.Entities:
Keywords: South Korea; fertility; future; infodemiology; infoveillance; ontology; public policy; social media
Year: 2021 PMID: 34125068 PMCID: PMC8240803 DOI: 10.2196/25028
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Internet Res ISSN: 1438-8871 Impact factor: 5.428
Figure 1The determinants-of-fertility ontology based on an ecological model.
Results for the content coverage of the ontology.
| Category | General public, n (%) | Public servants, n (%) | Total, n (%) |
| Existing concepts | 416 (92.0) | 93 (97.9) | 494 (92.9) |
| New concepts | 36 (8.0) | 2 (2.1) | 38 (7.1) |
| Total | 452 (100) | 95 (100) | 532 (100) |
Results for the structural and representational layers of the ontology.
| Criteria | Average score (range) | |
|
| ||
|
| Size | 4.80 (4-5) |
|
| Hierarchy depth | 4.60 (4-5) |
|
| Hierarchy breadth | 5.00 (5-5) |
|
| Density | 5.00 (5-5) |
|
| Balance | 4.60 (4-5) |
|
| Overall complexity | 5.00 (5-5) |
|
| Connectivity | 5.00 (5-5) |
|
| ||
|
| Match between formal and cognitive semantics | 4.73 (4-5) |
|
| Consistency | 4.50 (4-5) |
|
| Clarity | 4.87 (4-5) |
|
| Explicitness | 4.60 (3-5) |
|
| Interpretability | 4.67 (4-5) |
|
| Accuracy | 4.33 (4-5) |
|
| Comprehensiveness | 4.77 (4-5) |
|
| Granularity | 4.47 (3-5) |
|
| Relevance | 4.83 (4-5) |
|
| Description | 4.83 (4-5) |
Degree of diffusion (DoD), average DoD growth rate, and average document frequency for fertility issues.
| Category and keyword | DoDa | Average DoD growth rate | Average DFb | |||||||||||
|
| 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 |
|
| |||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||
|
| Population aging | 7463 | 8912 | 8002 | 4499 | 4503 | 0.088 | 6676 | ||||||
|
| Economic problems | 1637 | 2054 | 2523 | 1471 | 1503 | 0.214 | 1838 | ||||||
|
| Nuclearization of the family | 1178 | 1288 | 1229 | 667 | 628 | 0.054 | 998 | ||||||
|
| Changing perspectives about marriage | 1046 | 1528 | 1116 | 596 | 484 | 0.034 | 954 | ||||||
|
| Conservative values | 1150 | 1195 | 1139 | 576 | 565 | 0.036 | 925 | ||||||
|
| Violence and abuse | 685 | 800 | 726 | 461 | 527 | 0.158 | 640 | ||||||
|
| Employment problems | 515 | 510 | 436 | 306 | 208 | –0.008 | 395 | ||||||
|
| Gender inequality | 286 | 298 | 319 | 190 | 133 | 0.027 | 245 | ||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||
|
| Financial support for childbirth | 3061 | 3145 | 2548 | 1573 | 1250 | –0.015 | 2315 | ||||||
|
| Child-safety protection system | 1757 | 1632 | 1974 | 1241 | 1292 | 0.156 | 1579 | ||||||
|
| Infrastructure for childcare support | 1853 | 2209 | 1310 | 829 | 579 | –0.061 | 1356 | ||||||
|
| Maternity-leave system | 1067 | 995 | 798 | 828 | 383 | 0.044 | 814 | ||||||
|
| Policy public relations | 878 | 883 | 894 | 648 | 361 | 0.015 | 733 | ||||||
|
| Financial support for employment security | 392 | 341 | 345 | 233 | 196 | 0.045 | 301 | ||||||
|
| Flexible working arrangement | 330 | 264 | 354 | 287 | 180 | 0.120 | 283 | ||||||
|
| Family-friendly work environment | 161 | 130 | 77 | 49 | 35 | –0.146 | 90 | ||||||
|
| Smart work center | 131 | 114 | 90 | 50 | 27 | –0.161 | 82 | ||||||
aDoD: degree of diffusion.
bDF: document frequency.
Figure 2Future signal classification using the keyword issue map of fertility issues. Red rectangle (area A) indicates weak signals and blue rectangle (area B) indicates strong signals.
Future signal classification of fertility-issues keywords.
| Category and weak signals | Strong signals | Latent signals | Not-strong-but-well-known signals | |
|
| ||||
|
| Violence and abuse | Economic problems | Gender inequality | Conservative values |
|
| —a | Nuclearization of the family | Employment problems | — |
|
| — | Population aging | Changing perspectives about marriage | — |
|
| ||||
|
| Flexible working arrangement | Child-safety protection system | Policy public relations | Financial support for childbirth |
|
| Financial support for employment security | Maternity-leave system | Family-friendly work environment | Infrastructure for childcare support |
|
| — | — | Smart work center | — |
aNot applicable.