Edwin Fundingsland1, Joseph Fike1, Joshua Calvano1, Ali Raja2, Deborah Lai3, Sara Silacci4, Mary Haas5, Teresa Chan6, Shuhan He4. 1. Rocky Vista University College of Osteopathic Medicine Parker Colorado USA. 2. Department of Emergency Medicine Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA. 3. Division of Psychology and Language Sciences University College London London UK. 4. Center for Innovation in Digital HealthCare Massachusetts General Hospital Boston Massachusetts USA. 5. Department of Emergency Medicine University of Michigan Medical School Ann Arbor Michigan USA. 6. Division of Emergency Medicine Department of Medicine Program for Faculty Development Faculty of Health Sciences McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The Council of Residency Directors (CORD) in Emergency Medicine (EM) has recommended that all residency programs should conduct virtual interviews for the 2020 to 2021 application cycle due to the COVID-19 pandemic. While factors such as geographical region, city, program size, or hospital affiliation are not modifiable, EM residencies can bridge the information gap created by a lack of face-to-face interaction by representing themselves digitally. Measuring usability provides an objective method for EM residencies to improve their Web presence and effectively represent themselves to applicants. METHODS: Our sample set included 55 U.S. EM residency program websites. Using methodology replicated from previous literature on health care website usability, we divided usability into four categories for quantifiable analysis: accessibility, marketing, content quality, and technology. Analysis was performed on each website and scored in all four categories. A "general usability" score was calculated for each website using a composite of the key factors within the four categories. Using a weighted percentage across all of the factors, an overall score was calculated. RESULTS: Content quality was the overall highest scoring category (mean ± SD = 5.4, SE = 0.33). The overall lowest performing category was technology (mean ± SD = 0.8 ± 0.09, SE = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Measuring usability can help EM residency programs identify ways to improve their Web presence. To effectively promote their programs, residencies need quality content that communicates their key features. Our recommendation is for all residency programs to periodically perform website audits and apply the usability measures outlined to improve their digital presence, especially during times when face-to-face interactions will be limited.
OBJECTIVES: The Council of Residency Directors (CORD) in Emergency Medicine (EM) has recommended that all residency programs should conduct virtual interviews for the 2020 to 2021 application cycle due to the COVID-19 pandemic. While factors such as geographical region, city, program size, or hospital affiliation are not modifiable, EM residencies can bridge the information gap created by a lack of face-to-face interaction by representing themselves digitally. Measuring usability provides an objective method for EM residencies to improve their Web presence and effectively represent themselves to applicants. METHODS: Our sample set included 55 U.S. EM residency program websites. Using methodology replicated from previous literature on health care website usability, we divided usability into four categories for quantifiable analysis: accessibility, marketing, content quality, and technology. Analysis was performed on each website and scored in all four categories. A "general usability" score was calculated for each website using a composite of the key factors within the four categories. Using a weighted percentage across all of the factors, an overall score was calculated. RESULTS: Content quality was the overall highest scoring category (mean ± SD = 5.4, SE = 0.33). The overall lowest performing category was technology (mean ± SD = 0.8 ± 0.09, SE = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Measuring usability can help EM residency programs identify ways to improve their Web presence. To effectively promote their programs, residencies need quality content that communicates their key features. Our recommendation is for all residency programs to periodically perform website audits and apply the usability measures outlined to improve their digital presence, especially during times when face-to-face interactions will be limited.
Authors: Peter F Svider; Amar Gupta; Andrew P Johnson; Giancarlo Zuliani; Mahdi A Shkoukani; Jean Anderson Eloy; Adam J Folbe Journal: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 6.223
Authors: Vanessa M Miller; Luz A Padilla; Alissa Schuh; David Mauchley; David Cleveland; Zviadi Aburjania; Robert Dabal Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2019-10-08 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Timothy R Huerta; Jennifer L Hefner; Eric W Ford; Ann Scheck McAlearney; Nir Menachemi Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2014-02-25 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Edwin Lauritz Fundingsland; Joseph Fike; Joshua Calvano; Jeffrey Beach; Deborah Lai; Shuhan He Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2022-04-15 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Jonathan James Gale; Kameron Collin Black; Joshua David Calvano; Edwin Lauritz Fundingsland; Deborah Lai; Sara Silacci; Shuhan He Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2021-12-21 Impact factor: 5.428